Curricula

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro

Teaching methods

Opintojaksoon sisältyy lähipäivä Jamkin kampuksella la 4.5. klo 10-14.

Opintojakson opetusmenetelmiä ovat
Luento
Yhteinen työskentely
Pari- ja ryhmäkeskustelut
Itsenäinen opiskelu
Tentti
Oppimistehtävä

Practical training and working life connections

Opintojaksolla laaditaan kehittämistyön suunnitelma työelämän kehittämiseksi.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Verkkotentti keväällä 2024. Opiskelijalla on kaksi uusintamahdollisuutta.

Student workload

Lähipäivä 4 h
Oppimistehtävät 50 h
Opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen 41 h
Tenttiin valmistautuminen 40 h
Yhteensä 135 tuntia.

Further information for students

Opintojakson arviointi pohjautuu oppimistavoitteista johdettuihin arviointikriteereihin.

Tentti arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Kehittämistyön suunnitelma arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Hissipuhe arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.

Evaluation scale

Pass/Fail

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.


Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

-lectures/online lectures 20 h
- learning tasks 45 h
studying the course material 30 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h

Total 135 hours.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online Implementation

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Online exam (based on the book written by Toikko & Rantanen, 2009)
Individual learning assignments: essays
Lectures and webinars

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.

online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h
- studying the course material 40 h
- thesis process
- preparation for the exam 40

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

Online Implementation:

The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 2 webinars.

Further information for students

The evaluation is based on both qualitative and quantitative methods.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online course.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en


Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)

Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays, e-poster
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Practical training and working life connections

You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

The time of the online exam: Mon 29.1.2024 6am-9pm.

International connections

The course utilizes learning material in English.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 15 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 66 h

Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online implementation:
Presenting in Moodle-platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.

Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 3 webinars and learning tasks (essays and peer review, ePoster and self assessment) 3 op

Further information for students

Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
ePoster 50% grade of the course.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online course.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en


Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)

Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays, e-poster
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Practical training and working life connections

You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

The time of the online exam: Mon 29.1.2024 6am-9pm.

International connections

The course utilizes learning material in English.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 15 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 66 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online implementation:
Presenting in Moodle-platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.

Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 3 webinars and learning tasks (essays and peer review, ePoster and self assessment) 3 op

Further information for students

Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
ePoster 50% grade of the course.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- online lectures 8 h learning work
- webinars/replacing assignments 8 h
- learning tasks 75 h
- studying the course material 44 h
Total 135 learning work hours.

Content scheduling

The course starts with contact lessons 13.1.2024.
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
The first assignments are given on the start day.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 3 webinars and the course ends on 30.4.2024.

Further information for students

Evaluation methods:
Reflective self-evaluation, peer commentary, continuous feedback and overall evaluation of the course based on the learning tasks.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online 100%

Learning materials and recommended literature

Eskola, J. 2015. laadullisen tutkimuksen juhannustaiat. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi vaihe vaiheelta. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 185-189

Hakala, Juha. 2004. Opinnäyteopas ammattikorkeakouluille. Gaudeamus, Helsinki. https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/951-662-903-2

- Kirja esittelee keskeisimmät opinnäytteen tekijän kohtaamat kysymykset ja tarjoaa niihin ratkaisuehdotukset.

Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2010. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15-16 p. Helsinki: Tammi.

Kamppinen, M., Kuusi, O., Söderlund, S. 2002. Tulevaisuudentutkimus. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura

Kiviniemi, K. 2015. Laadullinen tutkimus prosessina. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 74-75
Klenke, K. 2016. Qualitative Researvh in the Study of Leadership. Great Britain. https://www.jamk.fi/kirjasto, Janet, Emerald

KvaliMOTV - Menetelmäopetuksen tietovaranto. Verkkojulkaisu. Tampere: Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto. https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/menetelmaopetus

KvantiMOT - Kvantitatiivisen tutkimuksen käsikirja https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/fi/palvelut/menetelmaopetus/kvanti/

Koskela, M. & Pilke, N. (2020). Tieteellisen tekstin jäsentäminen. Teoksessa H. Katajamäki (toim.), Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen tiedeyhteisössä (s. 123–134). VAKKI. https://vakki.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/KoskelaPilke123-134Tieteellinenkirjoittaminentiedeyhteisossa.pdf

Laadullisen aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta. N.d. Kajaanin ammattikorkeakoulu. https://www.kamk.fi/fi/opari/Opinnaytetyopakki/Teoreettinenmateriaali/Tukimateriaali/Laadullisen-analyysi-ja-tulkinta
Ojansalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2009. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro

Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3. painos. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

Puusa, A. & Juuti, P. 2011. Laadullisen lähestymistavan yleistyminen kulttuurinäkökulman myötä. Teoksessa Menetelmäviidakon raivaajat. Perusteita laadullisen tutkimuslähestymistavan valintaan. Toim. A. Puusa ja P. Juuti. Kirkkonummi: Johtamistaidon Opisto JTO

Rantala, I. 2015. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi tietokoneella. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 108- 116.

Solatie, J. 2001. Focusryhmät: Kvalitatiiviset ryhmäkeskustelut strategisen markkinointitutkimuksen apuna. Helsinki: Mainostajien liitto.
Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. 2018, Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi, Uudistettu laitos. edn, Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki

Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunna julkaisuja 3/2019. Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettiinen ennakointi Suomessa. https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/Ihmistieteiden_eettisen_ennakkoarvioinnin_o hje_2019.pdf.

Weber, K.M., Amanatidou, E.; Erdmann, L. & Nieminen, M. 2016. Research and innovation futures: exploring new ways of doing and organizing knowledge creation. Foresight: the Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy. Emerald publishing. Vol. 18, (193-203). https://janet.finna.fi, Proquest

Valli, R. 2015 . Johdatus tilastolliseen tutkimukseen. PS Kustannus, Jyväskylä. E-kirja, Luettavissa JAMK:n käyttäjätunnuksilla https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/9789524516761

Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2015. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 4.uud. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus
Vilkka, H. 2009. Tutki ja kehitä. 3. p., uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi

Teaching methods

You can study in the course at your own pace
- Individual learning tasks
- Small group work online
- Webinars
- Online Discussions

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- orientation assignments 10 h
- lectures/online lectures 10 h h
- webinars/replacing assignments 10 h
- learning assignments 65 h
- studying the course material 40 h

Total 135 hours

Content scheduling

In the course, learning takes place by participating in webinars, independent information search and by completing the learning assignments
Timetable of the learning assignments in the Moodle workspace
Presenting on the online discussion platform is a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.

Further information for students

Avoin amk 10 (sisältyy max-määrään)

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online, in Tuula Kotikoski's Zoom https://zoom.us/j/9925791129

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Tang, H. (2020). Engineering Research: Design, Methods, and Publication. Wiley.

Teaching methods

Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- webinars/replacing assignments 16 h
- learning tasks 79 h
- studying the course material 40 h

Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

The course starts with webinar lessons in Tuula's Zoom - message by email to confirm dates and times of the webinars i August.
Taking part in the course start webinar is also a sign of your participation in the course.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 7-8 webinars (dates confirmed later).

Further information for students

Assessment methods:
Reflective self-assessment, continuous feedback, assessment of the course is based on course assignments.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Brannen, J. 2016. Mixing methods: qualitative and quantitative research. Harlow: Pearson
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2023-03/HTK-ohje_2023.pdf

The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK guidelines 2019 https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Online exam on 18.12.2023. Two resit exams in January 2024.
Material for the examination: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- lectures/online lectures 3 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 17 h in 2024
- learning tasks 40 h
- studying the course material 35 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Directions for the exam 11.12. (video)
Online contact 11.12.
Online exam 18.12.
Online meetings in 2024

Further information for students

Arviointimenetelmät:
Reflektiivinen itsearviointi, vertaiskommentointi, jatkuva palaute ja opintojakson kokonaisarviointi verkkotenttiin ja oppimistehtäviin pohjautuen.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online 100%

Learning materials and recommended literature

Eskola, J. 2015. laadullisen tutkimuksen juhannustaiat. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi vaihe vaiheelta. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 185-189

Hakala, Juha. 2004. Opinnäyteopas ammattikorkeakouluille. Gaudeamus, Helsinki. https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/951-662-903-2

- Kirja esittelee keskeisimmät opinnäytteen tekijän kohtaamat kysymykset ja tarjoaa niihin ratkaisuehdotukset.

Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2010. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15-16 p. Helsinki: Tammi.

Kamppinen, M., Kuusi, O., Söderlund, S. 2002. Tulevaisuudentutkimus. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura

Kiviniemi, K. 2015. Laadullinen tutkimus prosessina. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 74-75
Klenke, K. 2016. Qualitative Researvh in the Study of Leadership. Great Britain. https://www.jamk.fi/kirjasto, Janet, Emerald

KvaliMOTV - Menetelmäopetuksen tietovaranto. Verkkojulkaisu. Tampere: Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto. https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/menetelmaopetus

KvantiMOT - Kvantitatiivisen tutkimuksen käsikirja https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/fi/palvelut/menetelmaopetus/kvanti/

Koskela, M. & Pilke, N. (2020). Tieteellisen tekstin jäsentäminen. Teoksessa H. Katajamäki (toim.), Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen tiedeyhteisössä (s. 123–134). VAKKI. https://vakki.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/KoskelaPilke123-134Tieteellinenkirjoittaminentiedeyhteisossa.pdf

Laadullisen aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta. N.d. Kajaanin ammattikorkeakoulu. https://www.kamk.fi/fi/opari/Opinnaytetyopakki/Teoreettinenmateriaali/Tukimateriaali/Laadullisen-analyysi-ja-tulkinta
Ojansalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2009. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro

Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3. painos. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

Puusa, A. & Juuti, P. 2011. Laadullisen lähestymistavan yleistyminen kulttuurinäkökulman myötä. Teoksessa Menetelmäviidakon raivaajat. Perusteita laadullisen tutkimuslähestymistavan valintaan. Toim. A. Puusa ja P. Juuti. Kirkkonummi: Johtamistaidon Opisto JTO

Rantala, I. 2015. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi tietokoneella. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 108- 116.

Solatie, J. 2001. Focusryhmät: Kvalitatiiviset ryhmäkeskustelut strategisen markkinointitutkimuksen apuna. Helsinki: Mainostajien liitto.
Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. 2018, Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi, Uudistettu laitos. edn, Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki

Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunna julkaisuja 3/2019. Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettiinen ennakointi Suomessa. https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/Ihmistieteiden_eettisen_ennakkoarvioinnin_o hje_2019.pdf.

Weber, K.M., Amanatidou, E.; Erdmann, L. & Nieminen, M. 2016. Research and innovation futures: exploring new ways of doing and organizing knowledge creation. Foresight: the Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy. Emerald publishing. Vol. 18, (193-203). https://janet.finna.fi, Proquest

Valli, R. 2015 . Johdatus tilastolliseen tutkimukseen. PS Kustannus, Jyväskylä. E-kirja, Luettavissa JAMK:n käyttäjätunnuksilla https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/9789524516761

Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2015. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 4.uud. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus
Vilkka, H. 2009. Tutki ja kehitä. 3. p., uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi

Teaching methods

You can study in the course at your own pace
- Individual learning tasks
- Small group work online
- Webinars
- Online Discussions

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- orientation assignments 10 h
- lectures/online lectures 10 h h
- webinars/replacing assignments 10 h
- learning assignments 65 h
- studying the course material 40 h

Total 135 hours

Content scheduling

In the course, learning takes place by participating in webinars, independent information search and by completing the learning assignments
Timetable of the learning assignments in the Moodle workspace
Presenting on the online discussion platform is a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.

Further information for students

Avoin amk 10 (sisältyy max-määrään)

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online course.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Eloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en


Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Retrieved 27.3.2023 from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)

Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays, poster
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Practical training and working life connections

You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.

International connections

The course utilizes learning material in English.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 15 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 66 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online implementation:
Presenting in Moodle-platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 3 webinars and learning tasks (essays and peer review, ePoster and self assessment) 3 op

Further information for students

Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Poster 50% grade of the course.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online course.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Eloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en


Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Retrieved 27.3.2023 from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)

Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays, poster
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Practical training and working life connections

You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.

International connections

The course utilizes learning material in English.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 15 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 66 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online implementation:
Presenting in Moodle-platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 3 webinars and learning tasks (essays and peer review, ePoster and self assessment) 3 op

Further information for students

Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Poster 50% grade of the course.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro

Teaching methods

Opintojakso toteutetaan täysin verkossa eli opintojaksolla sovelletaan erilaisia verkkopedagogisia menetelmiä.
Webinaarit/verkkoluennot
Oppimistehtävät

Practical training and working life connections

Opintojaksolla laaditaan kehittämistyön suunnitelma työelämän kehittämiseksi.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Verkkotentti keväällä 2023. Opiskelijalla on kaksi uusintamahdollisuutta.

Student workload

webinaarit 4 h
oppimistehtävät 50 h
opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen 41 h
tenttiin valmistautuminen 40 h
Yhteensä 135 tuntia.

Further information for students

Opintojakson arviointi pohjautuu oppimistavoitteista johdettuihin arviointikriteereihin.

Tentti arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Kehittämistyön suunnitelma arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Hissipuhe arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.
Vertaisarviointi arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty

Evaluation scale

Pass/Fail

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online course.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en


Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)

Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Practical training and working life connections

You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.

International connections

The course utilizes learning material in English.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 12 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 69 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online implementation:
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 4 webinars and learning tasks (essay collection, peer review and self assessment) 3 op

Further information for students

Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Essay collection 50% grade of the course.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.

Student workload

- lectures/online lectures 8 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 8 h
- learning tasks 75 h
- studying the course material 44 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

The course starts with contact lessons 27.1.2023.
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
Online exam is taken in the early part of the course.
The course is modular, where it takes around weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 3 webinars.

Further information for students

Evaluation methods:
Reflective self-evaluation, peer commentary, continuous feedback and overall evaluation of the course based on the learning tasks.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide

Student workload

- lectures/online lectures 8 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 8 h
- learning tasks 75 h
- studying the course material 44 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

The course starts with contact lessons 14.1.2023.
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
The first assignments are given on the start day.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 3 webinars.

Further information for students

Evaluation methods:
Reflective self-evaluation, peer commentary, continuous feedback and overall evaluation of the course based on the learning tasks.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online 100%

Learning materials and recommended literature

Eskola, J. 2015. laadullisen tutkimuksen juhannustaiat. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi vaihe vaiheelta. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 185-189

Hakala, Juha. 2004. Opinnäyteopas ammattikorkeakouluille. Gaudeamus, Helsinki. https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/951-662-903-2

- Kirja esittelee keskeisimmät opinnäytteen tekijän kohtaamat kysymykset ja tarjoaa niihin ratkaisuehdotukset.

Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2010. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15-16 p. Helsinki: Tammi.

Kamppinen, M., Kuusi, O., Söderlund, S. 2002. Tulevaisuudentutkimus. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura

Kiviniemi, K. 2015. Laadullinen tutkimus prosessina. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 74-75
Klenke, K. 2016. Qualitative Researvh in the Study of Leadership. Great Britain. https://www.jamk.fi/kirjasto, Janet, Emerald

KvaliMOTV - Menetelmäopetuksen tietovaranto. Verkkojulkaisu. Tampere: Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto. https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/menetelmaopetus

KvantiMOT - Kvantitatiivisen tutkimuksen käsikirja https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/fi/palvelut/menetelmaopetus/kvanti/

Koskela, M. & Pilke, N. (2020). Tieteellisen tekstin jäsentäminen. Teoksessa H. Katajamäki (toim.), Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen tiedeyhteisössä (s. 123–134). VAKKI. https://vakki.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/KoskelaPilke123-134Tieteellinenkirjoittaminentiedeyhteisossa.pdf

Laadullisen aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta. N.d. Kajaanin ammattikorkeakoulu. https://www.kamk.fi/fi/opari/Opinnaytetyopakki/Teoreettinenmateriaali/Tukimateriaali/Laadullisen-analyysi-ja-tulkinta
Ojansalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2009. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro

Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3. painos. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

Puusa, A. & Juuti, P. 2011. Laadullisen lähestymistavan yleistyminen kulttuurinäkökulman myötä. Teoksessa Menetelmäviidakon raivaajat. Perusteita laadullisen tutkimuslähestymistavan valintaan. Toim. A. Puusa ja P. Juuti. Kirkkonummi: Johtamistaidon Opisto JTO

Rantala, I. 2015. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi tietokoneella. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 108- 116.

Solatie, J. 2001. Focusryhmät: Kvalitatiiviset ryhmäkeskustelut strategisen markkinointitutkimuksen apuna. Helsinki: Mainostajien liitto.
Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. 2018, Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi, Uudistettu laitos. edn, Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki

Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunna julkaisuja 3/2019. Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettiinen ennakointi Suomessa. https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/Ihmistieteiden_eettisen_ennakkoarvioinnin_o hje_2019.pdf.

Weber, K.M., Amanatidou, E.; Erdmann, L. & Nieminen, M. 2016. Research and innovation futures: exploring new ways of doing and organizing knowledge creation. Foresight: the Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy. Emerald publishing. Vol. 18, (193-203). https://janet.finna.fi, Proquest

Valli, R. 2015 . Johdatus tilastolliseen tutkimukseen. PS Kustannus, Jyväskylä. E-kirja, Luettavissa JAMK:n käyttäjätunnuksilla https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/9789524516761

Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2015. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 4.uud. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus
Vilkka, H. 2009. Tutki ja kehitä. 3. p., uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi

Teaching methods

You can study in the course at your own pace
- Individual learning tasks
- Small group work online
- Webinars
- Online Discussions

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- orientation assignments 10 h
- lectures/online lectures 10 h h
- webinars/replacing assignments 10 h
- learning assignments 65 h
- studying the course material 40 h

Total 135 hours

Content scheduling

In the course, learning takes place by participating in webinars, independent information search and by completing the learning assignments
Timetable of the learning assignments in the Moodle workspace
Presenting on the online discussion platform is a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.

Further information for students

Avoin amk 10 (sisältyy max-määrään)

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online Implementation

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Online exam (based on the book written by Toikko & Rantanen, 2009)
Individual learning assignments: essays
Lectures and webinars

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h
- studying the course material 40 h
- thesis process
- preparation for the exam 40

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide

Student workload

Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 2-3 webinars

Content scheduling

The course has 3 webinars

Further information for students

Avoin amk 10 sisältyy paikkamääriin max

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online course.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en


Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)

Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Exam dates and retake possibilities

The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.

International connections

The course utilizes learning material in English.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 12 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 69 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online implementation:
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 4 webinars and learning tasks (essay collection, peer review and self assessment) 3 op

Further information for students

Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Essay collection 50% grade of the course.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online course.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en


Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)

Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Exam dates and retake possibilities

The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.

International connections

The course utilizes learning material in English.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 12 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 69 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online implementation:
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 4 webinars and learning tasks (essay collection, peer review and self assessment) 3 op

Further information for students

Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Essay collection 50% grade of the course.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.


Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

-lectures/online lectures 20 h
- learning tasks 45 h
studying the course material 30 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h

Total 135 hours.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Online exam in 12.12.2022. Two resit exams in January 2023.
Material for the examination: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 9 h
- learning tasks 40 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Directions for the exam 4.12. (video)
Online exam 12.12.
Online contact 15.12.

Further information for students

Arviointimenetelmät:
Reflektiivinen itsearviointi, vertaiskommentointi, jatkuva palaute ja opintojakson kokonaisarviointi verkkotenttiin ja oppimistehtäviin pohjautuen.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4

Vilkka, H. 2021. Tutki ja kehitä. Jyväskylä: PS Kustannus.

Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage. (soveltuvin osin)

Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (soveltuvin osin)

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Orientation assignment
Individual learning assignments: essays
Lectures and webinars

International connections

.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 80 h

Total 135 hours

Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.


The course has 2-3 webinars

Further information for students

Avoin amk 43

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.


Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

Tenttiin valmistautuminen + tentti 54 tuntia
Webinaarit 12 tuntia
Oppimistehtävät ja opiskelumateriaaliin tutustuminen 69 tuntia
verkkoluennot tai luennot tuntia

Content scheduling

Verkkototeutus. Opintojaksolla on 4 webinaaria.

Further information for students

Tentti muodostaa 50% arvosanasta
Esseekokoelma muodostaa 50% arvosanasta

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.


Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

Tenttiin valmistautuminen + tentti 54 tuntia
Webinaarit 12 tuntia
Oppimistehtävät ja opiskelumateriaaliin tutustuminen 69 tuntia
verkkoluennot tai luennot tuntia

Content scheduling

Verkkototeutus. Opintojaksolla on 4 webinaaria.

Further information for students

Tentti muodostaa 50% arvosanasta
Esseekokoelma muodostaa 50% arvosanasta

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro

Teaching methods

Opintojakso toteutetaan täysin verkossa eli opintojaksolla sovelletaan erilaisia verkkopedagogisia menetelmiä.
Webinaarit/verkkoluennot
Oppimistehtävät

Practical training and working life connections

Opintojaksolla laaditaan kehittämistyön suunnitelma työelämän kehittämiseksi.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Verkkotentti keväällä 2022. Opiskelijalla on kaksi uusintamahdollisuutta.

Student workload

webinaarit 2 h
oppimistehtävät 50 h
opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen 43 h
tenttiin valmistautuminen 40 h
Yhteensä 135 tuntia.

Further information for students

Opintojakson arviointi pohjautuu oppimistavoitteista johdettuihin arviointikriteereihin. Kokonaisarvosana muodostuu tentin ja kehittämistyön suunnitelman arvosanan keskiarvosta.
Tentti arvioidaan asteikolla 0-5
Kehittämistyön suunnitelma arvioidaan asteikolla 0-5
Hissipuhe arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.
Vertaisarviointi arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.


Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class

Practical training and working life connections

You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 2-3 webinars..

Further information for students

Peer review, reflective self-assessment, and teacher evaluation are used as assessment methods.
Assessment of learning tasks:
Discussion, introduction - evaluation on scale accepted - to be completed
Online exam - evaluation on scale 0-5, weight 20%
Expert blog posts and responses - evaluation on scale 0-5, weight 30%
Presentation of the development method and elevator speech or pecha kucha - evaluation on scale of 0-5, weight 40%
Reflection task on evaluation in development activities - evaluation on scale of 1-5, weight 10%

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 9 h
- learning tasks 40 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

The course starts with contact lessons 28.1.2022 (at 12:00-19:00).
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
Online exam is taken in the early part of the course.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 3 webinars (24.2., 31.3. and 5.5.).

Further information for students

Arviointimenetelmät:
Reflektiivinen itsearviointi, vertaiskommentointi, jatkuva palaute ja opintojakson kokonaisarviointi verkkotenttiin ja oppimistehtäviin pohjautuen.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.


Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 2-3 webinars..

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.


Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 2-3 webinars..

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

- lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 9 h
- learning tasks 40 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

The course starts with contact lessons 15.1.2021 (at 8:30-15:30).
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
Online exam is taken in the early part of the course.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 3 webinars (10.2.2022, 17.3.2022 and 21.4.2022).

Further information for students

Arviointimenetelmät:
Reflektiivinen itsearviointi, vertaiskommentointi, jatkuva palaute ja opintojakson kokonaisarviointi verkkotenttiin ja oppimistehtäviin pohjautuen.

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Time and location

Online 100%

Learning materials and recommended literature

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h
- studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 3 webinars

Further information for students

Avoin amk 10 sisältyy max-määrään

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Online exam (based on the book written by Toikko & Rantanen, 2009)
Individual learning assignments: essays
Lectures and webinars

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h
- studying the course material 40 h
- thesis process
- preparation for the exam 40 h

Total 135 hour

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 2-3 webinars

Content scheduling

The course has 3 webinars

Further information for students

avoin amk 10 sisältyy paikkamääriin max

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.


Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class

Practical training and working life connections

You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.

Alternative completion methods

You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.

Student workload

-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.

Content scheduling

Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.

The course has 2-3 webinars..

Further information for students

Peer review, reflective self-assessment, and teacher evaluation are used as assessment methods.
Assessment of learning tasks:
Discussion, introduction - evaluation on scale accepted - to be completed
Online exam - evaluation on scale 0-5, weight 20%
Expert blog posts and responses - evaluation on scale 0-5, weight 30%
Presentation of the development method and elevator speech or pecha kucha - evaluation on scale of 0-5, weight 40%
Reflection task on evaluation in development activities - evaluation on scale of 1-5, weight 10%

Evaluation scale

0-5

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.