Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Introduction to enabling occupationLaajuus (5 op)

Opintojakson tunnus: SWTS0133

Opintojakson perustiedot


Laajuus
5 op
Opetuskieli
englanti

Osaamistavoitteet

Opiskelija osaa selittää sekä soveltaa toimintaterapian taustalla olevaa teoriaa huomioiden erityisesti ihmisen toiminnallisen luonteen sekä toiminnallisuuden. Opiskelija erottelee erilaisia toimintaterapian interventiokeinoja asiakkaan toiminallisuuden ja osallistumisen mahdollistamiseen. Opiskelija osaa yhdistää ja soveltaa toiminnan ja osallistumisen teorioihin tarkoituksenmukaista tietoa biologiasta, lääketieteestä, käyttäytymistieteistä, psykologiasta, sosiologiasta, teknologiasta ja toiminnan tieteestä. Opiskelija perustelee toimintakeskeisen intervention moniammatillisessa yhteisössä.

Sisältö

toiminta- ja asiakaskeskeiset intervention lähestymistavat asiakkaan toiminnan mahdollistamisessa
-moniammatillinen yhteistyö
-näyttöönperustuva toimintaterapia
-kliininen päätöksenteko ja harkinta
-toiminnallisten tavoitteiden asettaminen moniammatillisessa yhteistyössä ja toimintaterapiassa

Esitietovaatimukset

-

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

5: The student’s ability to choose and justify chosen intervention approaches for the client to enable occupation and participation is excellent. He/she is able to compare broadly different kinds of intervention approaches critically and can apply knowledge from biological, medical, human, psychological, social, technological and occupational sciences to justify their clinical reasoning. The student is able to write written assignments according to the rules of JAMK reporting.
4: The student is able to choose and justify chosen intervention approaches for the client to enable occupation and participation. He/she compares different kinds of intervention approaches and can apply knowledge from biological, medical, human, psychological, social, technological and occupational sciences to justify their clinical reasoning. The student writes their written assignment mostly in accordance with JAMK reporting rules.

3: The student chooses and justifies chosen intervention approaches for the client to enable occupation and participation. He/she compares different kinds of intervention approaches. He/she has used knowledge from biological, medical, human, psychological, social, technological and occupational sciences to justify his/her clinical reasoning but there are some disadvantages. The student writes their written assignment mostly in accordance with JAMK reporting rules.

2: The student chooses intervention approaches for the client to enable occupation and participation. He/she compares different kinds of intervention approaches and justifies their clinical reasoning via clinical experiences. It is difficult to notice how he/she uses knowledge from biological, medical, human, psychological, social, technological and occupational sciences to justify their clinical reasoning. The student writes their written assignment mostly in accordance with JAMK reporting rules.

1: The student chooses intervention approaches for the client to enable occupation and participation. He/she has some problems comparing different kinds of intervention approaches. He/she justifies their clinical reasoning only via previous clinical experiences. How he/she uses knowledge from biological, medical, human, psychological, social, technological and occupational sciences to justify their clinical reasoning is unclear. The student writes their written assignment mostly in accordance with JAMK reporting rules but there are moderate disadvantages.

Siirry alkuun