BIO Campus Nordic Soul Project 1 (5op)

Osaamistavoitteet

On successful completion of this module a student will be able to evidence the following:

Students are able to Evidence and Demonstrate:

• The students are able to work as active members of international projects and in multicultural environments.
• They have good inter team skills needed in international interaction and Multidisciplinary Teamwork
• They understand the Factors that facilitate, influence and impact Project Delivery.

Sisältö

• Bio Economy, and its Context
• New Construction Techniques in the Bioeconomy
• New Innovations in Research and Development in the Bioeconomy
• New Transferrable Technologies to the Construction industry
• New Networks in the Bio Economy

Esitietovaatimukset

Basic skills in the development of personal competence and, project work and team activity, Proficiency in Englih Language

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

Arviointimenetelmät ja -kriteerit/
Assessment Methods and Criteria: Assessment Methods Strategy

Learners are engaged with a varied array of types of feedback. detailed below they are given at various stages to the assessment process :
• Tutorials = Conversational informal Formative 1 to 1 Feedback/Feedforward
• Formative Peer Assessment, = Conversational Informal formative Feedforward
• Interim reviews = Written and Recorded informal Summative & Formative Feedback/Feedforward
• ‘Crits’ = Written and Recorded formal Summative & Formative Feedback
• Project Reviews in module = Conversational formal Summative Feedback
• Formal Crits = Written and Recorded formal Summative & Formative Feedback/Feedforward from external practitioners
• Final Hand in Presentations for Comprehensive Design Projects (CDP) = Written and Recorded Formal Summative & Formative Feedback from external practitioners and Academic team.

Criteria
For the general assessment criteria of the competence
Please see the website of JAMK University of Applied Sciences (www.jamk.fi/english/forstudents/studyguide).

Participation for the training sessions and practical project work with the customers as well as written essays are part of the evaluation. Self evaluation in the form of reflection papers plays a central role in the
evaluation process.

0= no compentence
The learner has no competences from the area under evaluation. The performance is far below the target (not enough training session or project work hours, bad quality in essays and reflection papers).
S= compentent
The learner understands the basics from the area under evaluation. She/he has enough project hours and the reflection paper describes the learning.