Opinnäytetyö osa 2 (10 cr)
Code: SZZO1510-3011
General information
Enrollment
03.08.2020 - 30.08.2020
Timing
31.08.2020 - 23.06.2021
Number of ECTS credits allocated
10 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
Hyvinvointiyksikkö
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Sosionomi (AMK)
Teachers
- Asta Suomi
- Sanna Peltola
- Tarja Tapio
Groups
-
SOS18S1Sosionomi
-
SOS19S1Sosionomi
-
SOS19SMSosionomi
-
SOS17SMSosionomi
-
SOS18SMSosionomi
-
SOS17S1Sosionomi
Objective
The student
- is able to implement a research or development project that benefits working life, her own field of study or professional development independently, responsibly and within a cooperative network
- knows how to communicate her work at different stages clearly, correctly and graphically to a peer and other audiences
- knows how to report the results of her work, evaluate them and bring forth suggestions for development in an appropriate manner in writing, orally and visually
Content
- Realization/production of the thesis
- Reporting of the thesis
- Written, verbal or visual disclosure of the thesis results and their publication within a community of experts
- Evaluation of the thesis work process
Further information
This Course is meant for Students of the School of Health and Social Studies who has conducted Thesis, Part 1 (SZZO1500-0K0s2) during the Spring 2020.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Pass (S)
The student
• implements working life, field-specific or professional knowledge from a useful research & development project independently, responsibly and in cooperation with others
• knows how to process and critically evaluate information, theories, concepts, methods and principles from her own field
• knows how to report the results of her work, evaluate them and bring forth suggestions for development in an appropriate manner in writing, orally and visually
• knows how to communicate her work at different stages clearly, rationally and graphically to a peer and other audiences
• is able to evaluate and develop her own knowledge and readiness for continuous learning
The thesis is evaluated summatively following its completion and presentation, on a five-point scale according to thesis-specific criteria: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very good), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory) and 1 (Adequate). The evaluation criteria for the thesis are published on the jamk.fi/en Web site.
Qualifications
Sufficient familiarity with one's own professional field and research and development methods. The student has successfully compiled an approved thesis plan and theoretical framework.