Opinnäytetyö osa 1 (5 cr)

Evaluation scale

Pass/Fail

Objective

The student is able to identify development needs and problem areas in his/her own field of study and work, and knows how to design a research & development project and implement it as a thesis. He/she knows how to use reliable information from various sources in establishing the foundation and parameters of the thesis. The student is able to apply professional knowledge in and choose appropriate research & development methods and practices for his/her thesis.

Content

-Process and procedures for the thesis
-Thesis topic and statement of the thesis problem as as a proposal
-Drafting and presentation of the thesis plan
-Source-critical information retrieval
-Academic writing and the formulation of a theoretical framework

Materials

Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Uusin versio. Opinnäytetyön raportointiohje. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. Viitattu 3.3.2015. http://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje JAMK:n opinnäytetyöhön liittyvä ohjeistus opinto-oppaassa Yksikkökohtainen ohjeistus opiskelijaintrassa Tiedonhankinnan opiskelumateriaali verkossa.Muu ajankohtainen materiaali.

Completion alternatives

Research design Seminars Data acquisition Research communication Acatemic writing

Student workload

Seminars 27 h Research communication 27 h Data acquisition 16 h Academic writing 17 h Independent work 48 h Total 135 h

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Pass (S)
The student
•is able to identify development needs and problem areas in his/her own field of study and work in cooperation with working life
•develops an appropriate research & development project into a thesis by applying information, methods and behavioral skills acquired from the field
•knows how to retrieve, process and critically evaluate information, theories, concepts, methods and principles from his/her own field
•is able to compile a research-based body of knowledge and cite sources in accordance with JAMK's instructions
•is able to apply professional expertise to and select appropriate research & development methods and practices for his/her research & development work
•is capable of taking responsibility for group learning and knowledge sharing

The thesis is evaluated summatively following its completion and presentation, on a five-point scale according to thesis-specific criteria: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very good), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory) and 1 (Adequate).

Qualifications

Sufficient familiarity with one's own professional field and research and development methods.