Harjoittelu 4 - Innovointi (6 cr)
Code: HAKHW400-9S0Y1
General information
- Timing
-
31.08.2019 - 11.06.2021
Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 6 cr
- Local portion
- 6 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Face-to-face
- Unit
- School of Business
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Team Academy
- Teachers
- Timo Lehtonen
- Juha Ruuska
- Anu Manner
- Ulla Luukas
- Tapu Holttinen
- Kimmo Aho
- Janne Roiha
- Essi Silvennoinen
- Groups
-
HTA18S1Tiimiakatemian tutkinto-ohjelma
- Course
- HAKHW400
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Objective
The participants are able to apply to practice the theoretical knowledge acquired through the studies leading to a Bachelor of Business Administration Degree at the Team Academy. They are able to bring to practice their know-how on innovation and creativity and use related tools and methods in their work.
Content
Determined by the preconditions of the practical training venue, innovation being the umbrella theme.
Materials
Determined by the preconditions of the participant and the practical training venue. A general recommendation: literature related to creativity and innovation.
Completion alternatives
The implemented practical training as a whole (e.g. documentation, planning, implementation, impact) (100%)
Student workload
Practical work: 154 h. Reporting: 8 h. TOTAL: 162 h.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Team entrepreneur’s evaluation is based on general attitude towards the learning, usage of the competence and making the knowledge visible. Participation for the training sessions and practical project work with the customers as well as written essays are part of the evaluation. Self evaluation in the form of reflection papers plays a central role in the evaluation process.
0= no compentence
The learner has no competences from the area under evaluation. The performance is far below the target (not enough training session or project work hours, bad quality in essays and reflection papers).
S= compentent
The learner understands the basics from the area under evaluation. She/he has enough project hours and the reflection paper describes the learning.
Qualifications
-