Skip to main content

Harjoittelu 2 - Asiakkuudet ja markkinointi (6 cr)

Code: HAKHW200-9S0Y1

General information


Timing
31.08.2019 - 11.06.2021
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
6 cr
Local portion
6 cr
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
Finnish
Degree programmes
Bachelor's Degree Programme in Team Academy
Teachers
Timo Lehtonen
Juha Ruuska
Anu Manner
Ulla Luukas
Tapu Holttinen
Kimmo Aho
Janne Roiha
Essi Silvennoinen
Groups
HTA18S1
Tiimiakatemian tutkinto-ohjelma
Course
HAKHW200
No reservations found for realization HAKHW200-9S0Y1!

Evaluation scale

Pass/Fail

Objective

The participants are able to apply to practice the theoretical knowledge acquired through the studies leading to a Bachelor of Business Administration Degree at the Team Academy. They are able to bring to practice know-how on learning and use the tools and methods of learning in their work.

Content

Determined by the conditions in the practical training venue, customership and marketing being the overall theme.

Materials

Determined by the qualities of the participant and the conditions in the practical training venue. A general recommendation: literature related to customer service, sales and marketing.

Completion alternatives

The implemented practical training as an entity (e.g. documentation, planning, implementation, and impact) (100%)

Student workload

Practical work: 154 h. Reporting: 8 h. TOTAL: 162 h.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Team entrepreneur’s evaluation is based on general attitude towards the learning, usage of the competence and making the knowledge visible. Participation for the training sessions and practical project work with the customers as well as written essays are part of the evaluation. Self evaluation in the form of reflection papers plays a central role in the evaluation process.

0= no compentence
The learner has no competences from the area under evaluation. The performance is far below the target (not enough training session or project work hours, bad quality in essays and reflection papers).
S= compentent
The learner understands the basics from the area under evaluation. She/he has enough project hours and the reflection paper describes the learning.

Qualifications

-

Go back to top of page