Cyber Threat Information and Data-analytics (5 cr)
Code: TTC6030-3005
General information
- Enrollment
-
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
-
09.01.2023 - 28.04.2023
Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 0 cr
- Virtual portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Online learning
- Unit
- School of Technology
- Campus
- Lutakko Campus
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Seats
- 0 - 30
- Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
- Teachers
- Mika Rantonen
- Jarmo Nevala
- Heli Ciszek
- Groups
-
ZJA23KTIKY2Avoin amk, Kyberturvallisuus 2, Verkko
- Course
- TTC6030
Evaluation scale
0-5
Objective
Purpose:
You understand the principles of threat intelligence, its types and exploitability in cyber defense. You learn to utilise data analytics methods in handling great amounts of data from cyber security perspective. You understand the significance of enriching the data with external data sources.
EUR-ACE Competences:
Multidisciplinary competences
Knowledge and understanding
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Learning outcomes:
You know the basic concepts of threat intelligence, you understand the purpose of threat intelligence and data-analytics, you can apply correct methods to the specific problems, and you can do data-analytics using Python programming language.
Content
Content:
Principles and forms of threat intelligence
Exploitability of threat intelligence
Methods of data analytics in handling data and exploitation
Enriching threat intelligence with external sources
Materials
Materials in the e-learning environment.
Teaching methods
- lectures
- independent study
- distance learning
- webinars
- small group learning
- exercises
- learning tasks
- seminars
Employer connections
- excursions
- visiting lecturers
- projects
Exam schedules
The possible date and method of the exam will be announced in the course opening.
Completion alternatives
The admission procedures are described in the degree rule and the study guide. The teacher of the course will give you more information on possible specific course practices.
Student workload
One credit (1 Cr) corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work.
- lectures 52 h
- exercises 15 h
- assignment 35 h
- independent study 30 h
- company visits 3 h
Total 135 h
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Sufficient 1: You know superficially the principles and types of threat intelligence in cyber defense. You are able to select the most common methods for the problem to be solved and are able to apply the most common methods. Additionally, you are able to give a constricted assessment of their implementation and justify the conclusions.
Satisfactory 2: You knows the principles and types of threat intelligence in cyber defense. You are able to select the most common methods for the problem to be solved and you are to apply their technical competence to practice. Additionally, You are able to assess their implementation superficially and justify the conclusions.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3: You know the principles, types and exploitability of threat intelligence in cyber defense. You are able to select the most common methods for the problem to be solved and are able to apply their technical competence to practice. Additionally, you are able to assess their implementation versatilely and justify the conclusions.
Very good 4: You know the principles, types and exploitability of threat intelligence in cyber defense. You are able to select the correct methods for the problem to be solved and are able to apply their technical competence to practice. Additionally, you are able to assess their implementation versatilely and justify the conclusions.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5: You know the principles, types and exploitability of threat intelligence in cyber defense. You are able to select the correct methods for the problem to be solved and are able to apply their technical competence to practice. Additionally, you are able to assess their implementation critically and justify the conclusions.