Skip to main content

Research-based Development (5 cr)

Code: YZZZ0110-3051

General information


Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
22.04.2024 - 16.06.2024
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 cr
Local portion
2 cr
Virtual portion
3 cr
Mode of delivery
Blended learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
Teachers
Eero Aarresola
Marjo Turunen
Groups
YLO23S1
Insinööri (ylempi AMK), logistiikka
YTV23S1
Insinööri (ylempi AMK), verkostojohtaminen
ZJAYTV23S1
Avoin amk, Verkostojohtaminen, insinööri, Monimuoto
Course
YZZZ0110

Realization has 2 reservations. Total duration of reservations is 6 h 0 min.

Time Topic Location
Sat 04.05.2024 time 10:00 - 14:00
(4 h 0 min)
Tutkiva kehittäminen YZZZ0110-3051
R35B117 Oppimistila
Tue 28.05.2024 time 13:00 - 15:00
(2 h 0 min)
Tutkiva kehittäminen YZZZ0110-3051
ETÄ
Changes to reservations may be possible.

Evaluation scale

Pass/Fail

Objective

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Materials

Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro

Teaching methods

Opintojaksoon sisältyy lähipäivä Jamkin kampuksella la 4.5. klo 10-14.

Opintojakson opetusmenetelmiä ovat
Luento
Yhteinen työskentely
Pari- ja ryhmäkeskustelut
Itsenäinen opiskelu
Tentti
Oppimistehtävä

Employer connections

Opintojaksolla laaditaan kehittämistyön suunnitelma työelämän kehittämiseksi.

Exam schedules

Verkkotentti keväällä 2024. Opiskelijalla on kaksi uusintamahdollisuutta.

Student workload

Lähipäivä 4 h
Oppimistehtävät 50 h
Opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen 41 h
Tenttiin valmistautuminen 40 h
Yhteensä 135 tuntia.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

Opintojakson arviointi pohjautuu oppimistavoitteista johdettuihin arviointikriteereihin.

Tentti arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Kehittämistyön suunnitelma arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Hissipuhe arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.

Go back to top of page