Research and Development (5 cr)

Evaluation scale

0-5

Content scheduling

- Opinnäytetyön geneerinen rakenne, arviointikriteerit
- Kehittämisen prosessi: tavoitteen määrittely, tutkimuskysymys tai kehittämistehtävä, työelämätiedon hankinta, aineiston keruun ja analyysin menetelmät, luotettavuuden arviointi
- Tutkimusetiikka ja hyvä tieteellinen tai taiteellinen käytäntö
- Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta: kehittämistehtävän asettaminen, kehittämismenetelmien valinta, aineistonkeruu ja analysointi, tutkimuksellisen kehittämistoiminnan luotettavuuden arviointi
- Opinnäytetyön aihe-ehdotuksen laadinta

Objective

Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.

Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence

EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working

Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.

Content

Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)

The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses

Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice

Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis

Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review

Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)

Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities

Preparation of a thesis topic proposal

Location and time

15.9.-3.10. Ennakkotehtävä Moodlessa
3.10.-31.1. Webinaarit perjantaisin Zoomissa 8.45-11.45

Materials

Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.

Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en

Teaching methods

Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam

Exam schedules

Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.

Completion alternatives

Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.

Student workload

- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h

Total 135 hours.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.

Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.

Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.

Further information

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
Välttävä 1
Tunnet kehittämisprosessin vaiheet. Tiedät, miten hankkia omaa alaasi koskevaa työelämä- ja tutkimustietoa. Tiedät keskeisiä kehittämismenetelmiä. Tunnet hyvän tieteellisen käytännön periaatteet ja toimit niiden mukaisesti.

Tyydyttävä 2
Osaat hankkia omaa alaansi koskevaa työelämä- ja tutkimustietoa. Tunnistat kehittämismenetelmien soveltamismahdollisuuksia. Tunnet opinnäytetyöhön hyvän tieteellisen käytännön periaatteet ja toimit niiden mukaisesti.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)
Hyvä 3
Osaat itsenäisesti hankkia omaa alaasi koskevaa työelämä- ja tutkimustietoa sekä arvioida sitä. Osaat valita opinnäytetyöhösi soveltuvan kehittämismenetelmän ja perustella valintaasi. Tunnet hyvän tieteellisen käytännön periaatteet ja toimit niiden mukaisesti.

Kiitettävä 4
Osaat itsenäisesti hankkia omaa alaasi koskevaa työelämä- ja tutkimustietoa sekä arvioida sitä kriittisesti. Osaat valita opinnäytetyöhösi soveltuvan kehittämismenetelmän ja perustella valintaasi. Tunnet hyvän tieteellisen käytännön periaatteet ja toimit niiden mukaisesti

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)
Erinomainen 5
Osaat itsenäisesti hankkia omaa alaasi koskevaa työelämä- ja tutkimustietoa sekä arvioida sitä. Osaat analysoida kehittämismenetelmien eroja ja perustella tekemiäsi menetelmävalintoja. Osaat arvioida kehittämisehdotuksia ja niiden toteuttamista työelämässä. Tunnet hyvän tieteellisen käytännön periaatteet ja toimit niiden mukaisesti