Toimintakyvyn arviointi (8 cr)

Evaluation scale

0-5

Objective

Student can study and analyse the preconditions and limitations of functioning, particularly the client’s locomotion and body functions. Student
can determine the results of the evaluations and the interpretations based on them in a meaningful and reliable manner. He/she can record essential observations on the client’s functioning using ICF-structure.

Content

Assessment of functioning, performance and physical condition. Assessment of movement, balance, coordination and position. Assessment of muscle and joint functions. Assessment of the functioning of the respiratory and circulatory systems. Pain assessment. Special characteristics for assessment of different areas of functional ability for different age groups.

Materials

Magee, D.latest edition. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. Saunders. TOIMIA-data,Guidelines

Completion alternatives

Face-to face and Distance Learning: Active participation in contact lessons (lab exercises) distance assingnments Case assignments, projects. Practical exam

Student workload

Face-to-face learning: Contact lessons and exercises: 5 credits (135h) Independent, team and case study: 3 credits (81h) Distance learning:contact lessons and exercises 3 credits (81h), independent and e-learning 5 credits (135h)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

o Excellent (5)
The student demonstrates in assessments of functioning an extremely broad knowledge and set of skills, is capable of creative work, is able to give reasons for his/her actions, and works constructively as part of a team. The student’s guidance and manual work are skilled and the conclusions he/she draws are well thought out. The student takes ergonomics into consideration in his/her work and is able to give critical self-assessments and peer reviews. The student’s written assignments demonstrate the ability to describe and give reasons for the topic area’s phenomena through critical thinking and the diverse and proper use of evidence based sources. The student has followed the JAMK reporting instructions.

o Very good (4)
The student demonstrates broad knowledge and skills, strives to work creatively, is able to give reasons for his/her actions, and works constructively as part of a team. The student’s guidance and manual work are skilled and the conclusions he/she draws are well thought out. The student takes ergonomics into consideration in his/her work and is able to give critical self-assessments and peer reviews. The student’s written assignments demonstrate the ability to describe and give reasons for the topic area’s phenomena through critical thinking and the diverse and proper use of evidence based sources. The student has followed the JAMK reporting instructions.

o Good (3)
The student demonstrates good knowledge and skills, is able to give reasons for his/her actions, strives to link information and skills and works constructively as part of a team. In a demonstration the student’s guidance and manual work are fluent, his/her conclusions are correct, and he/she takes ergonomics into consideration in his/her actions. The student is able to give self-assessments and peer reviews. The student’s written assignments demonstrate the ability to describe and give reasons for the subject area’s phenomena by utilising diverse and proper evidence based sources. The student has followed the JAMK reporting instructions.

o Satisfactory (2)
The student works constructively as part of a team. The student’s knowledge is made up of fragmented although subject related details. In a demonstration the student’s guidance and manual work show uncertainty. The student's ergonomics are lacking, and he/she has a difficulty in drawing conclusions. The student has assessed both his/her own competence and that of his/her course mates. The student has completed the agreed upon assignments. The student’s assignments display few connections between presented topics and very little analysis. However, the student has summarised the field's literature and listed sources. The student has followed the JAMK reporting instructions.

o Below average (1)
The student works constructively as part of a team. The student’s knowledge is made up of fragmented although subject related details. In a demonstration student’s guidance and manual work show uncertainty. The student's ergonomic work is lacking, and he/she has a difficulty in drawing conclusions. The student has assessed both his/her own competence and that of his/her course mates. The student has completed the agreed upon assignments. The student’s assignments display few connections between presented topics and very little analysis. However, the student has summarised the field's literature and listed sources.

oFail (0)
The student does not work constructively as part of a team. The student’s knowledge is lacking, his/her actions and manual work are illogical and unsure. The student does not take ergonomics into consideration. The student is unable to give a self-assessment. The student’s written work shows a lack of familiarity with the subject area covered in the text, and the information presented repeats lecture material, are fragmented or not related to the subject area. The use of sources is fragmented. Any of the aforementioned criteria can lead t

Qualifications

Basics of Anatomy and physiology, Anatomy & physiology II, Exercise Physiology and Biomechanics, Motor Development and Learning