Toimitilajohtaminen tapahtumassa (5 cr)
Code: MMPF2600-7K0M4
General information
- Timing
-
01.01.2017 - 31.07.2017
Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Face-to-face
- Unit
- School of Business
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Service Management
- Teachers
- Kirsti Hintikka-Mäkinen
- Groups
-
MRE15S1AMatkailu- ja palveluliiketoiminta
-
MRE15S1BMatkailu- ja palveluliiketoiminta
-
MPA14S1Palvelujen tuottamisen ja johtamisen ko.
- Course
- MMPF2600
Evaluation scale
0-5
Objective
On successful completion of this module a student will be able to evidence the following:
Students are able to Evidence and Demonstrate:
• Working Knowledge of the Legal Framework and Process of Event Management connected to Facilities
• Broad Awareness of the Economic and Managerial Principles in relation to Facilities and Events
• Critical Understanding of the roles obligations of stakeholder in delivery of an Event
• Critical Understanding of Sustainability: its impact and viability upon Facilities connected with Events
• Critical Understanding of Facility Management Principles in the Field of Event Management
• Skill in evaluating the suitability of an Event, Its Design and Management in relation to an Organization and its facilities to deliver innovative projects.
Content
• The Life of an Event
• Process and Design
• International Perspectives, Events as a Global Industry, Differing Sectors.
• Strategic management, People Places Events.
• Event Architecture, the Business, economics and Management of Events
• Creating Innovative Event Cultures
• The Sustainable Event Manager
Materials
Will be specified at the beginning of the course, specific to the Projects undertaken
Completion alternatives
individual and group work project work
Student workload
Individual and group work 85 hours Project work 50 hours
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Satisfactory (2) - The student shows theoretical and conceptual knowledge of the subject area at a reasonably clear level. Central concepts have been defined satisfactorily. The student has an obvious overall command and understanding of the subject area but fails to show a convincing ability to apply theory into real life situations.
Good (3) - The student shows theoretical and conceptual knowledge of the subject are at a relatively clear level. Central concepts have been defined rather well. The student displays a competent command of the subject area. The student shows adequate but general ability to apply theory into real-life situations. The student can communicate in effective way. Within a team environment, the student contributes to the content adequately and participates actively in group meetings. The group delivers the project rather independently under supervision. The aims of the project have been achieved and the results have some significance. Group communication in oral, written and digital format is comprehensible and the structure is descriptive.
Very good (4) - The student shows great theoretical and conceptual knowledge of subject area. Central concepts have been defined very well and the student displays a very good command and understanding of the subject area. The student demonstrates a competent ability to apply theory into real-life situations and the ideas are worth implementing. The student shows superior communications skills. Within a team environment, student contributes to the content providing relevant sources of information and is supportive of others and allows them to participate. The group delivers the project independently under supervision. The aims of the project have been achieved well and the results are of significance. Group communication in oral, written and digital format is fluent, almost error free and precise.
Excellent (5) - The student shows exceptional theoretical and conceptual knowledge of subject area in detail. The student demonstrates an advanced ability to apply theory into real-life situations and expresses ideas that have significant value for implementation. The student shows superior communications skills with critical arguing.
Within a team environment student contributes to the content extensively providing new and relevant sources of information and shows supportive leadership capability. The group delivers the project independently under supervision. The aims of the project have been achieved very well and the results are significant. Group communication in oral, written and digital format is fluent, impressive, error free and precise.
Qualifications
1st Year Studies completed
Further information
Kirsti Hintikka-Mäkinen