YAMK-opinnäytetyö, osa 1 (10 cr)

Evaluation scale

Pass/Fail

Objective

The student is able to identify development needs and problem areas in his/her own field of study and work, and knows how to design a research or development project and implement it as a master’s thesis. He/she knows how to use reliable information from various sources in establishing the foundation and parameters of the master’s thesis. The student is able to apply professional knowledge in and choose appropriate research and/or development methods and practices for his/her master’s thesis.

Content

-Thesis process and practices
-Thesis topic and thesis topic proposal
-Research/development plan and presentation of the research plan
-Critical literature review in Finnish and English
-Theoretical framework

Materials

Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. 2015. Opinnäytetyön raportointiohje. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. Viitattu 3.3.2015. http://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohjeThesis quidelines in study guide. Study material in the net.

Completion alternatives

Approved topic proposal Agreement with an assigner Approved thesis research plan and framework Summary of data gathering, analysis and processing attached to the thesis Thesis seminars/workshops or webinars/net workshops

Student workload

Seminars/workshops 27-52h or webinars/net workshops 27-52h Independent work 108-218h Total 135h (one credit equals 27 hours of student work).

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The course is graded as Pass/Fail, marked as “S (Pass)” and “0 (Fail)”. If the student does not meet the minimum criteria set for the course, the grade is 0 (Fail).

Pass (S)
The student
• is able to identify development needs and problem areas in his/her own field of study and work in cooperation with working life
• develops an appropriate research or development project into a master’s thesis by applying information, methods and behavioral skills acquired from the field
• knows how to retrieve, process and critically evaluate information, theories, concepts, methods and principles from his/her own field
• is able to compile a evidence-based/research-based body of knowledge and cite sources in accordance with JAMK's instructions
• is able to apply professional expertise to and select appropriate research/development methods and practices for his/her research & development work

The thesis is evaluated summatively following its completion and presentation, on a five-point scale according to thesis-specific criteria: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very good), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory) and 1 (Adequate).

Qualifications

Bachelor's degree

Further information

-