Research-based DevelopmentLaajuus (5 cr)
Code: YZZZ0110
Credits
5 op
Teaching language
- English
- Finnish
Responsible person
- Sari Järvinen, Hyvinvointiyksikkö
- Eero Aarresola, Teknologia
- Sanna Nieminen, Teknologia
- Sami Kalliomaa, Liiketalous
- Anne Törn-Laapio, Liiketalous
Objective
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
20.11.2024 - 04.01.2025
Timing
22.01.2025 - 12.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Heidi Neuvonen
- Tarja Niemelä
Groups
-
YMJ23S1Matkailu- ja palveluliiketoiminnan johtaminen (YAMK)
-
YHO23S1Organisaation ja talouden johtaminen (YAMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online 100%
Learning materials and recommended literature
Hyytinen, H. (2015). Looking beyond the obvious: Theoretical, empirical and methodological insights into critical thinking. Väitöskirja. Helsingin yliopisto.
Jyväskylä University of Applied Sciences. (2023). 4.4.3 Good scientific practice, data protection and research permit
Silverman, D. (2024). Interpreting Qualitative Data. UK: Sage.
The Finnish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and Procedures for Handling Alleged Violations of Research Integrity in Finland 2023. Available online at: https://tenk.fi/fi/ajankohtaista/korjaus-htk-2023-ohjeen-englanninkieliseen-kaannokseen
Teaching methods
Research-based development is an online course. You study in the Moodle learning environment. In Moodle you will find course instructions, schedules, assignments and study materials. You will also attend webinars. In webinars, you reflect and share what you have learned communally with your peer students.
You will conduct independent information gathering and apply what you have learned in learning assignments to the Exploratory Development learning diary.
During the first three weeks of the study period, each student does an orientation assignment, which confirms your attendance at the study course.
Guidance
You will receive guidance in the Moodle learning environment (e.g. question and answer forum) and webinars. You will also receive guidance from your peer students.
Feedback
You will receive both qualitative and quantitative evaluation and feedback on your Learning Day book learning assignment.
You give feedback on the course (mid-term and final feedback on the implementation).
Practical training and working life connections
Your student group forms a working life-oriented peer learning network.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
No exam.
International connections
During the course, you will utilize international research literature.
Alternative completion methods
You can familiarise yourself with 17§ of Jamk's degree regulations when con-sidering the recognition and recognition of course competence based on your previously acquired competence and the objectives of the course.
Student workload
Your indicative use of time during the 5-credit course is 135 working hours, which is divided as follows:
Orientation to the course 6 h
Studying with learning materials 52 h
Completing learning assignments 66 h
Online lectures and webinars 8 h
Self-assessment and feedback 3 h
Content scheduling
In the course, learning takes place by participating in webinars, independent information search and by completing the learning assignments
Timetable of the learning assignments in the Moodle workspace
Presenting on the online discussion platform is a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The study course is divided into three parts as follows:
2 ECTS Research operations
2 ECTS Development operations
1 ECTS Thesis process
Each part includes individual learning tasks and exams
Further information for students
You will receive formative and summative assessment (teacher/peer review) according to the sequencing of content and assignments.
In the study course, updated Arene recommendations and Jamk's rules are followed in the utilization of artificial intelligence, instructions and possible ethical questions.
Open UAS number of places 5
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
21.11.2024 - 31.01.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
Teachers
- Juha Paananen
Groups
-
ZJAYTH24K1Avoin amk, YAMK-polut, Elinkaaren hallinta, Monimuoto
-
YTH24K1Elinkaaren hallinta (YAMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
According to Life Cycle Management curruculum.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Brannen, J. 2016. Mixing methods: qualitative and quantitative research. Harlow: Pearson
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2023-03/HTK-ohje_2023.pdf
The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK guidelines 2019 https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf
Teaching methods
Intented for Life Cycle Management students.
Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam on 18.12.2023. Two resit exams in January 2024.
Material for the examination: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 3 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 17 h
- learning tasks 40 h
- studying the course material 35 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Course start 21.11.
Directions for the exam 12.12. (video)
Online contact 12.12.
Online exam 16.12.
Further information for students
Evaluation methods:
Reflective self-evaluation, peer commentary, continuous feedback and overall evaluation of the course based on the online exam and learning tasks.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
22.04.2024 - 16.06.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
3 op
Mode of delivery
40 % Face-to-face, 60 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
Teachers
- Eero Aarresola
- Marjo Turunen
Groups
-
ZJAYLO23S1Avoin amk, Logistiikka (YAMK), monimuoto
-
YLO23S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), logistiikka
-
YTV23S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), verkostojohtaminen
-
ZJAYTV23S1Avoin amk, Verkostojohtaminen, insinööri, Monimuoto
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro
Teaching methods
Opintojaksoon sisältyy lähipäivä Jamkin kampuksella la 4.5. klo 10-14.
Opintojakson opetusmenetelmiä ovat
Luento
Yhteinen työskentely
Pari- ja ryhmäkeskustelut
Itsenäinen opiskelu
Tentti
Oppimistehtävä
Practical training and working life connections
Opintojaksolla laaditaan kehittämistyön suunnitelma työelämän kehittämiseksi.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti keväällä 2024. Opiskelijalla on kaksi uusintamahdollisuutta.
Student workload
Lähipäivä 4 h
Oppimistehtävät 50 h
Opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen 41 h
Tenttiin valmistautuminen 40 h
Yhteensä 135 tuntia.
Further information for students
Opintojakson arviointi pohjautuu oppimistavoitteista johdettuihin arviointikriteereihin.
Tentti arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Kehittämistyön suunnitelma arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Hissipuhe arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
02.01.2024 - 19.01.2024
Timing
20.01.2024 - 31.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
Teachers
- Tarja Stenman
- Laura Vertainen
- Tero Vesisenaho
- Hannariina Honkanen
- Aapeli Piesala
Teacher in charge
Laura Vertainen
Groups
-
YLB24K1Agrologi (ylempi AMK), biotalouden kehittäminen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
-lectures/online lectures 20 h
- learning tasks 45 h
studying the course material 30 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
15.01.2024 - 07.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
Teachers
- Tarja Niemelä
Groups
-
ZJAYMJ23S1Avoin AMK, marata, YAMK-polut, Matkailu ja palveluliiketoiminnan johtaminen
-
YMJ23S1Matkailu- ja palveluliiketoiminnan johtaminen (YAMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online Implementation
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Online exam (based on the book written by Toikko & Rantanen, 2009)
Individual learning assignments: essays
Lectures and webinars
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h
- studying the course material 40 h
- thesis process
- preparation for the exam 40
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
Online Implementation:
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 2 webinars.
Further information for students
The evaluation is based on both qualitative and quantitative methods.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 22.01.2024
Timing
15.01.2024 - 28.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 30
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Riitta Räsänen
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Pauliina Soanvaara
Groups
-
YSC24KMTerveyden edistämisen tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK)
-
YSU24K1Monialainen kuntoutus (YAMK)
-
ZJAYSU24KMAvoin AMK, sote, Monialainen kuntoutus, YAMK-polku
-
ZJAYSC24KMAvoin AMK, sote, Terveyden edistäminen, YAMK-polku
-
YSV23S1Sosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, verkostojohtaminen
-
ZJA25KSYAvoin AMK, sote, YAMK
-
ZJAYSV23S1Avoin AMK, sote, Verkostojohtaminen, YAMK-polku
-
YSH23S1Sosiaali- ja terveysalan johtamisen tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK)
-
ZJAYSH23S1Avoin AMK, sote, Sosiaali- ja terveysalan johtaminen, YAMK-polku
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online course.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)
Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays, e-poster
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Practical training and working life connections
You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The time of the online exam: Mon 29.1.2024 6am-9pm.
International connections
The course utilizes learning material in English.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 15 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 66 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online implementation:
Presenting in Moodle-platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 3 webinars and learning tasks (essays and peer review, ePoster and self assessment) 3 op
Further information for students
Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
ePoster 50% grade of the course.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
15.01.2024 - 28.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Riitta Räsänen
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Pauliina Soanvaara
Groups
-
ZJAYSG23S1Avoin AMK, sote,Sosiaalialan ylempi AMK, erityissosiaaliohjaus (YAMK), YAMK-polku
-
YSV23S1Sosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, verkostojohtaminen
-
YSG23S1Sosiaalialan ylempi AMK, erityissosiaaliohjaus (YAMK)
-
YSB23S1Projektijohtaminen YAMK
-
ZJAYSB23S1Avoin AMK, sote,Projektijohtaminen, YAMK-polku
-
ZJAYSV23S1Avoin AMK, sote, Verkostojohtaminen, YAMK-polku
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online course.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)
Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays, e-poster
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Practical training and working life connections
You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The time of the online exam: Mon 29.1.2024 6am-9pm.
International connections
The course utilizes learning material in English.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 15 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 66 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online implementation:
Presenting in Moodle-platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 3 webinars and learning tasks (essays and peer review, ePoster and self assessment) 3 op
Further information for students
Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
ePoster 50% grade of the course.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2023 - 12.01.2024
Timing
13.01.2024 - 31.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 60
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
Teachers
- Matti Siistonen
- Harri Peuranen
Teacher in charge
Harri Peuranen
Groups
-
ZJAYTB23S1Avoin amk, Projektijohtaminen, insinööri, Verkko
-
YTB23S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), Projektijohtaminen
-
ZJAYTO23S1Avoin amk, Teknologialiiketoiminnan johtaminen , Monimuoto
-
YTO23S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), teknologialiiketoiminnan johtaminen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online lectures 8 h learning work
- webinars/replacing assignments 8 h
- learning tasks 75 h
- studying the course material 44 h
Total 135 learning work hours.
Content scheduling
The course starts with contact lessons 13.1.2024.
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
The first assignments are given on the start day.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 3 webinars and the course ends on 30.4.2024.
Further information for students
Evaluation methods:
Reflective self-evaluation, peer commentary, continuous feedback and overall evaluation of the course based on the learning tasks.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
12.01.2024 - 07.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Sami Kalliomaa
- Anne Törn-Laapio
Groups
-
ZJAYHO23S1Avoin AMK, lita, YAMK-polut, Organisaation ja talouden johtaminen
-
YHO23S1Organisaation ja talouden johtaminen (YAMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online 100%
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. 2015. laadullisen tutkimuksen juhannustaiat. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi vaihe vaiheelta. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 185-189
Hakala, Juha. 2004. Opinnäyteopas ammattikorkeakouluille. Gaudeamus, Helsinki. https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/951-662-903-2
- Kirja esittelee keskeisimmät opinnäytteen tekijän kohtaamat kysymykset ja tarjoaa niihin ratkaisuehdotukset.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2010. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15-16 p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kamppinen, M., Kuusi, O., Söderlund, S. 2002. Tulevaisuudentutkimus. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura
Kiviniemi, K. 2015. Laadullinen tutkimus prosessina. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 74-75
Klenke, K. 2016. Qualitative Researvh in the Study of Leadership. Great Britain. https://www.jamk.fi/kirjasto, Janet, Emerald
KvaliMOTV - Menetelmäopetuksen tietovaranto. Verkkojulkaisu. Tampere: Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto. https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/menetelmaopetus
KvantiMOT - Kvantitatiivisen tutkimuksen käsikirja https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/fi/palvelut/menetelmaopetus/kvanti/
Koskela, M. & Pilke, N. (2020). Tieteellisen tekstin jäsentäminen. Teoksessa H. Katajamäki (toim.), Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen tiedeyhteisössä (s. 123–134). VAKKI. https://vakki.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/KoskelaPilke123-134Tieteellinenkirjoittaminentiedeyhteisossa.pdf
Laadullisen aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta. N.d. Kajaanin ammattikorkeakoulu. https://www.kamk.fi/fi/opari/Opinnaytetyopakki/Teoreettinenmateriaali/Tukimateriaali/Laadullisen-analyysi-ja-tulkinta
Ojansalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2009. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro
Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3. painos. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
Puusa, A. & Juuti, P. 2011. Laadullisen lähestymistavan yleistyminen kulttuurinäkökulman myötä. Teoksessa Menetelmäviidakon raivaajat. Perusteita laadullisen tutkimuslähestymistavan valintaan. Toim. A. Puusa ja P. Juuti. Kirkkonummi: Johtamistaidon Opisto JTO
Rantala, I. 2015. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi tietokoneella. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 108- 116.
Solatie, J. 2001. Focusryhmät: Kvalitatiiviset ryhmäkeskustelut strategisen markkinointitutkimuksen apuna. Helsinki: Mainostajien liitto.
Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. 2018, Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi, Uudistettu laitos. edn, Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki
Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunna julkaisuja 3/2019. Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettiinen ennakointi Suomessa. https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/Ihmistieteiden_eettisen_ennakkoarvioinnin_o hje_2019.pdf.
Weber, K.M., Amanatidou, E.; Erdmann, L. & Nieminen, M. 2016. Research and innovation futures: exploring new ways of doing and organizing knowledge creation. Foresight: the Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy. Emerald publishing. Vol. 18, (193-203). https://janet.finna.fi, Proquest
Valli, R. 2015 . Johdatus tilastolliseen tutkimukseen. PS Kustannus, Jyväskylä. E-kirja, Luettavissa JAMK:n käyttäjätunnuksilla https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/9789524516761
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2015. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 4.uud. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus
Vilkka, H. 2009. Tutki ja kehitä. 3. p., uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi
Teaching methods
You can study in the course at your own pace
- Individual learning tasks
- Small group work online
- Webinars
- Online Discussions
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- orientation assignments 10 h
- lectures/online lectures 10 h h
- webinars/replacing assignments 10 h
- learning assignments 65 h
- studying the course material 40 h
Total 135 hours
Content scheduling
In the course, learning takes place by participating in webinars, independent information search and by completing the learning assignments
Timetable of the learning assignments in the Moodle workspace
Presenting on the online discussion platform is a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
Further information for students
Avoin amk 10 (sisältyy max-määrään)
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 19.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree Programme in Robotics
Teachers
- Tuula Kotikoski
Groups
-
YTG23S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), robotiikka
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online, in Tuula Kotikoski's Zoom https://zoom.us/j/9925791129
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Tang, H. (2020). Engineering Research: Design, Methods, and Publication. Wiley.
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- webinars/replacing assignments 16 h
- learning tasks 79 h
- studying the course material 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
The course starts with webinar lessons in Tuula's Zoom - message by email to confirm dates and times of the webinars i August.
Taking part in the course start webinar is also a sign of your participation in the course.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 7-8 webinars (dates confirmed later).
Further information for students
Assessment methods:
Reflective self-assessment, continuous feedback, assessment of the course is based on course assignments.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 30.11.2023
Timing
01.12.2023 - 31.01.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree Programme in Low Carbon Civil Engineering
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
Teachers
- Juha Paananen
- Pekka Lähdesmäki
- Pasi Lehtola
Groups
-
YTH23K1Elinkaaren hallinta (YAMK)
-
YTY23K1Vähähiilinen rakentaminen- tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK)
-
ZJAYTY23K1Avoin amk, YAMK-polut, Vähähiilinen rakentaminen, Monimuoto
-
ZJAYTH23K1Avoin amk, YAMK-polut, Elinkaaren hallinta, Monimuoto
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Brannen, J. 2016. Mixing methods: qualitative and quantitative research. Harlow: Pearson
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2023-03/HTK-ohje_2023.pdf
The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK guidelines 2019 https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam on 18.12.2023. Two resit exams in January 2024.
Material for the examination: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 3 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 17 h in 2024
- learning tasks 40 h
- studying the course material 35 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Directions for the exam 11.12. (video)
Online contact 11.12.
Online exam 18.12.
Online meetings in 2024
Further information for students
Arviointimenetelmät:
Reflektiivinen itsearviointi, vertaiskommentointi, jatkuva palaute ja opintojakson kokonaisarviointi verkkotenttiin ja oppimistehtäviin pohjautuen.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 10.09.2023
Timing
18.09.2023 - 21.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
Teachers
- Sami Kalliomaa
- Anne Törn-Laapio
Teacher in charge
Sami Kalliomaa
Groups
-
YMJ22S1Matkailu- ja palveluliiketoiminnan johtaminen (YAMK)
-
YHO22S1Organisaation ja talouden johtaminen (YAMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online 100%
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. 2015. laadullisen tutkimuksen juhannustaiat. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi vaihe vaiheelta. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 185-189
Hakala, Juha. 2004. Opinnäyteopas ammattikorkeakouluille. Gaudeamus, Helsinki. https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/951-662-903-2
- Kirja esittelee keskeisimmät opinnäytteen tekijän kohtaamat kysymykset ja tarjoaa niihin ratkaisuehdotukset.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2010. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15-16 p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kamppinen, M., Kuusi, O., Söderlund, S. 2002. Tulevaisuudentutkimus. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura
Kiviniemi, K. 2015. Laadullinen tutkimus prosessina. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 74-75
Klenke, K. 2016. Qualitative Researvh in the Study of Leadership. Great Britain. https://www.jamk.fi/kirjasto, Janet, Emerald
KvaliMOTV - Menetelmäopetuksen tietovaranto. Verkkojulkaisu. Tampere: Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto. https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/menetelmaopetus
KvantiMOT - Kvantitatiivisen tutkimuksen käsikirja https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/fi/palvelut/menetelmaopetus/kvanti/
Koskela, M. & Pilke, N. (2020). Tieteellisen tekstin jäsentäminen. Teoksessa H. Katajamäki (toim.), Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen tiedeyhteisössä (s. 123–134). VAKKI. https://vakki.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/KoskelaPilke123-134Tieteellinenkirjoittaminentiedeyhteisossa.pdf
Laadullisen aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta. N.d. Kajaanin ammattikorkeakoulu. https://www.kamk.fi/fi/opari/Opinnaytetyopakki/Teoreettinenmateriaali/Tukimateriaali/Laadullisen-analyysi-ja-tulkinta
Ojansalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2009. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro
Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3. painos. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
Puusa, A. & Juuti, P. 2011. Laadullisen lähestymistavan yleistyminen kulttuurinäkökulman myötä. Teoksessa Menetelmäviidakon raivaajat. Perusteita laadullisen tutkimuslähestymistavan valintaan. Toim. A. Puusa ja P. Juuti. Kirkkonummi: Johtamistaidon Opisto JTO
Rantala, I. 2015. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi tietokoneella. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 108- 116.
Solatie, J. 2001. Focusryhmät: Kvalitatiiviset ryhmäkeskustelut strategisen markkinointitutkimuksen apuna. Helsinki: Mainostajien liitto.
Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. 2018, Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi, Uudistettu laitos. edn, Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki
Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunna julkaisuja 3/2019. Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettiinen ennakointi Suomessa. https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/Ihmistieteiden_eettisen_ennakkoarvioinnin_o hje_2019.pdf.
Weber, K.M., Amanatidou, E.; Erdmann, L. & Nieminen, M. 2016. Research and innovation futures: exploring new ways of doing and organizing knowledge creation. Foresight: the Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy. Emerald publishing. Vol. 18, (193-203). https://janet.finna.fi, Proquest
Valli, R. 2015 . Johdatus tilastolliseen tutkimukseen. PS Kustannus, Jyväskylä. E-kirja, Luettavissa JAMK:n käyttäjätunnuksilla https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/9789524516761
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2015. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 4.uud. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus
Vilkka, H. 2009. Tutki ja kehitä. 3. p., uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi
Teaching methods
You can study in the course at your own pace
- Individual learning tasks
- Small group work online
- Webinars
- Online Discussions
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- orientation assignments 10 h
- lectures/online lectures 10 h h
- webinars/replacing assignments 10 h
- learning assignments 65 h
- studying the course material 40 h
Total 135 hours
Content scheduling
In the course, learning takes place by participating in webinars, independent information search and by completing the learning assignments
Timetable of the learning assignments in the Moodle workspace
Presenting on the online discussion platform is a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
Further information for students
Avoin amk 10 (sisältyy max-määrään)
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 28.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 10.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 45
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Riitta Räsänen
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Pauliina Soanvaara
Groups
-
YKM23S1Musiikkipedagogi (ylempi AMK)
-
YSU23KMMonialainen kuntoutus (YAMK)
-
ZJAYSC23KMAvoin AMK, sote, Terveyden edistäminen, YAMK-polku
-
YSC23KMTerveyden edistämisen tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK)
-
ZJAYSU23KMAvoin AMK, sote, Monialainen kuntoutus, YAMK-polku
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online course.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Eloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Retrieved 27.3.2023 from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)
Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays, poster
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Practical training and working life connections
You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.
International connections
The course utilizes learning material in English.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 15 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 66 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online implementation:
Presenting in Moodle-platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 3 webinars and learning tasks (essays and peer review, ePoster and self assessment) 3 op
Further information for students
Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Poster 50% grade of the course.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 28.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 10.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 45
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Riitta Räsänen
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Pauliina Soanvaara
Groups
-
YSV23S1Sosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, verkostojohtaminen
-
YSB23S1Projektijohtaminen YAMK
-
ZJAYSB23S1Avoin AMK, sote,Projektijohtaminen, YAMK-polku
-
ZJAYSV23S1Avoin AMK, sote, Verkostojohtaminen, YAMK-polku
-
YSH23S1Sosiaali- ja terveysalan johtamisen tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK)
-
ZJAYSH23S1Avoin AMK, sote, Sosiaali- ja terveysalan johtaminen, YAMK-polku
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online course.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Eloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2023. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Retrieved 27.3.2023 from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)
Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays, poster
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Practical training and working life connections
You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.
International connections
The course utilizes learning material in English.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 15 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 66 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online implementation:
Presenting in Moodle-platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 3 webinars and learning tasks (essays and peer review, ePoster and self assessment) 3 op
Further information for students
Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Poster 50% grade of the course.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
24.04.2023 - 16.06.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 100
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
Teachers
- Jukka Eerola
- Sanna Nieminen
Teacher in charge
Sanna Nieminen
Groups
-
YTM22S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), Digitaalinen toimitusketju
-
YTV22S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), verkostojohtaminen
-
ZJAYTV22S1Avoin amk, Verkostojohtaminen, insinööri, YAMK
-
YLO22S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), logistiikka
-
ZJA22STVEJAvoin amk, Verkostojohtaminen, Monimuoto
-
ZJAYTM22S1Avoin amk, Digitaalinen toimitusketju, Verkko
-
ZJAYLO22S1Avoin amk, Logistiikka (YAMK), monimuoto
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro
Teaching methods
Opintojakso toteutetaan täysin verkossa eli opintojaksolla sovelletaan erilaisia verkkopedagogisia menetelmiä.
Webinaarit/verkkoluennot
Oppimistehtävät
Practical training and working life connections
Opintojaksolla laaditaan kehittämistyön suunnitelma työelämän kehittämiseksi.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti keväällä 2023. Opiskelijalla on kaksi uusintamahdollisuutta.
Student workload
webinaarit 4 h
oppimistehtävät 50 h
opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen 41 h
tenttiin valmistautuminen 40 h
Yhteensä 135 tuntia.
Further information for students
Opintojakson arviointi pohjautuu oppimistavoitteista johdettuihin arviointikriteereihin.
Tentti arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Kehittämistyön suunnitelma arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Hissipuhe arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.
Vertaisarviointi arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 28.02.2023
Timing
27.03.2023 - 28.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 20
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Riitta Räsänen
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Emilia Lahdenperä
Groups
-
YSY22SMSosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, monialainen kuntoutus
-
ZJAYSY22SKAvoin AMK, sote, Kliininen asiantuntija, YAMK-polku
-
ZJA23KSYAvoin YAMK, sote
-
ZJAYSY22SMAvoin AMK, sote, Monialainen kuntoutus, YAMK-polku
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online course.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)
Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Practical training and working life connections
You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.
International connections
The course utilizes learning material in English.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 12 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 69 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online implementation:
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 4 webinars and learning tasks (essay collection, peer review and self assessment) 3 op
Further information for students
Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Essay collection 50% grade of the course.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 13.01.2023
Timing
27.01.2023 - 14.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
Teachers
- Janne Sundelin
- Hannariina Honkanen
Groups
-
YTO22S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), teknologialiiketoiminnan johtaminen
-
YTB22S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), Projektijohtaminen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 8 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 8 h
- learning tasks 75 h
- studying the course material 44 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
The course starts with contact lessons 27.1.2023.
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
Online exam is taken in the early part of the course.
The course is modular, where it takes around weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 3 webinars.
Further information for students
Evaluation methods:
Reflective self-evaluation, peer commentary, continuous feedback and overall evaluation of the course based on the learning tasks.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 13.01.2023
Timing
14.01.2023 - 30.04.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
TA11 - Teollisuustekniikka
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree Programme in Robotics
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
Teachers
- Janne Sundelin
- Hannariina Honkanen
Teacher in charge
Hannariina Honkanen
Groups
-
YTK22S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), kestävä energia
-
YTG22S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), robotiikka
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 8 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 8 h
- learning tasks 75 h
- studying the course material 44 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
The course starts with contact lessons 14.1.2023.
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
The first assignments are given on the start day.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 3 webinars.
Further information for students
Evaluation methods:
Reflective self-evaluation, peer commentary, continuous feedback and overall evaluation of the course based on the learning tasks.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 27.03.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 45
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
Teachers
- Sami Kalliomaa
- Anne Törn-Laapio
Groups
-
ZJAYHO22S1Avoin AMK, lita, YAMK-polut, Organisaation ja talouden johtaminen
-
YHO22S1Organisaation ja talouden johtaminen (YAMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online 100%
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. 2015. laadullisen tutkimuksen juhannustaiat. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi vaihe vaiheelta. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 185-189
Hakala, Juha. 2004. Opinnäyteopas ammattikorkeakouluille. Gaudeamus, Helsinki. https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/951-662-903-2
- Kirja esittelee keskeisimmät opinnäytteen tekijän kohtaamat kysymykset ja tarjoaa niihin ratkaisuehdotukset.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2010. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15-16 p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kamppinen, M., Kuusi, O., Söderlund, S. 2002. Tulevaisuudentutkimus. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura
Kiviniemi, K. 2015. Laadullinen tutkimus prosessina. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 74-75
Klenke, K. 2016. Qualitative Researvh in the Study of Leadership. Great Britain. https://www.jamk.fi/kirjasto, Janet, Emerald
KvaliMOTV - Menetelmäopetuksen tietovaranto. Verkkojulkaisu. Tampere: Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto. https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/menetelmaopetus
KvantiMOT - Kvantitatiivisen tutkimuksen käsikirja https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/fi/palvelut/menetelmaopetus/kvanti/
Koskela, M. & Pilke, N. (2020). Tieteellisen tekstin jäsentäminen. Teoksessa H. Katajamäki (toim.), Tieteellinen kirjoittaminen tiedeyhteisössä (s. 123–134). VAKKI. https://vakki.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/KoskelaPilke123-134Tieteellinenkirjoittaminentiedeyhteisossa.pdf
Laadullisen aineiston analyysi ja tulkinta. N.d. Kajaanin ammattikorkeakoulu. https://www.kamk.fi/fi/opari/Opinnaytetyopakki/Teoreettinenmateriaali/Tukimateriaali/Laadullisen-analyysi-ja-tulkinta
Ojansalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2009. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro
Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3. painos. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
Puusa, A. & Juuti, P. 2011. Laadullisen lähestymistavan yleistyminen kulttuurinäkökulman myötä. Teoksessa Menetelmäviidakon raivaajat. Perusteita laadullisen tutkimuslähestymistavan valintaan. Toim. A. Puusa ja P. Juuti. Kirkkonummi: Johtamistaidon Opisto JTO
Rantala, I. 2015. Laadullisen aineiston analyysi tietokoneella. Teoksessa Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin 2. Näkökumia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. Toim. Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. Juva: Bookwell Oy, 108- 116.
Solatie, J. 2001. Focusryhmät: Kvalitatiiviset ryhmäkeskustelut strategisen markkinointitutkimuksen apuna. Helsinki: Mainostajien liitto.
Tuomi, J. & Sarajärvi, A. 2018, Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi, Uudistettu laitos. edn, Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki
Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunna julkaisuja 3/2019. Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettiinen ennakointi Suomessa. https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/Ihmistieteiden_eettisen_ennakkoarvioinnin_o hje_2019.pdf.
Weber, K.M., Amanatidou, E.; Erdmann, L. & Nieminen, M. 2016. Research and innovation futures: exploring new ways of doing and organizing knowledge creation. Foresight: the Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy. Emerald publishing. Vol. 18, (193-203). https://janet.finna.fi, Proquest
Valli, R. 2015 . Johdatus tilastolliseen tutkimukseen. PS Kustannus, Jyväskylä. E-kirja, Luettavissa JAMK:n käyttäjätunnuksilla https://www.ellibslibrary.com/book/9789524516761
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2015. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 4.uud. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus
Vilkka, H. 2009. Tutki ja kehitä. 3. p., uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi
Teaching methods
You can study in the course at your own pace
- Individual learning tasks
- Small group work online
- Webinars
- Online Discussions
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- orientation assignments 10 h
- lectures/online lectures 10 h h
- webinars/replacing assignments 10 h
- learning assignments 65 h
- studying the course material 40 h
Total 135 hours
Content scheduling
In the course, learning takes place by participating in webinars, independent information search and by completing the learning assignments
Timetable of the learning assignments in the Moodle workspace
Presenting on the online discussion platform is a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
Further information for students
Avoin amk 10 (sisältyy max-määrään)
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 26.03.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
Teachers
- Tarja Niemelä
Groups
-
YMJ22S1Matkailu- ja palveluliiketoiminnan johtaminen (YAMK)
-
ZJAYMJ22S1Avoin AMK, marata, YAMK-polut, Matkailu ja palveluliiketoiminnan johtaminen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online Implementation
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Online exam (based on the book written by Toikko & Rantanen, 2009)
Individual learning assignments: essays
Lectures and webinars
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h
- studying the course material 40 h
- thesis process
- preparation for the exam 40
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide
Student workload
Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 2-3 webinars
Content scheduling
The course has 3 webinars
Further information for students
Avoin amk 10 sisältyy paikkamääriin max
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 30.04.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Riitta Räsänen
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Emilia Lahdenperä
Groups
-
ZJAYSY22SJAvoin AMK, sote, Sosiaali- ja terveysalan johtaminen, YAMK-polku
-
YSY22SJSosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, Sosiaali- ja terveysalan johtaminen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online course.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)
Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.
International connections
The course utilizes learning material in English.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 12 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 69 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online implementation:
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 4 webinars and learning tasks (essay collection, peer review and self assessment) 3 op
Further information for students
Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Essay collection 50% grade of the course.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 30.04.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Riitta Räsänen
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Emilia Lahdenperä
Groups
-
YSV22S1Sosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, verkostojohtaminen
-
ZJAYSB22S1Avoin AMK, sote, Projektijohtaminen, YAMK-polku
-
YSB22S1Projektijohtaminen YAMK
-
ZJAYSV22S1Avoin AMK, sote, Verkostojohtaminen, YAMK-polku
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online course.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Online-exam: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy ja Salonen, K., Saloranta, S., Hautala, T. & Kinos. S. 2017. Kehittämistoiminta ja kehittämisen menetelmiä ammatillisessa korkeakoulutuksessa. Turun AMK (both available as e-books) and other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Other study material:
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (applicable parts)
or
Kehittämistutkimus opetusalalla. 2013. Toim. J. Pernaa, Jyväskylä:PS-kustannus. (applicable parts)
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (applicable parts)
Other relevant material will be agreed in the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks: essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The time of the online exam is announced in the course´s Moodle-platform as soon as it opens.
International connections
The course utilizes learning material in English.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online exam (preparation for the exam and exam): 54 h
- webinars: 12 h
- learning tasks and studying the course material: 69 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online implementation:
Module 1: online exam and preparation for the exam) 2 op
Module 2: 4 webinars and learning tasks (essay collection, peer review and self assessment) 3 op
Further information for students
Online-exam 50% grade of the course.
Essay collection 50% grade of the course.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
01.01.2023 - 31.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
RDI portion
2 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
TA16 - Biotalousinstituutti
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
Teachers
- Tarja Stenman
- Laura Vertainen
- Tero Vesisenaho
- Hannariina Honkanen
- Aapeli Piesala
Groups
-
YLB23K1Agrologi (ylempi AMK), biotalouden kehittäminen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
-lectures/online lectures 20 h
- learning tasks 45 h
studying the course material 30 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
01.12.2022 - 31.01.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
Teachers
- Pasi Lehtola
Teacher in charge
Sanna Nieminen
Groups
-
ZJA22KTPYEHAvoin amk, Tekniikka, Insinööri (YAMK), Elinkaaren hallinta
-
YTH22K1Elinkaaren hallinta (YAMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam in 12.12.2022. Two resit exams in January 2023.
Material for the examination: Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 9 h
- learning tasks 40 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Directions for the exam 4.12. (video)
Online exam 12.12.
Online contact 15.12.
Further information for students
Arviointimenetelmät:
Reflektiivinen itsearviointi, vertaiskommentointi, jatkuva palaute ja opintojakson kokonaisarviointi verkkotenttiin ja oppimistehtäviin pohjautuen.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 30.08.2022
Timing
12.09.2022 - 04.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
Teachers
- Sami Kalliomaa
- Anne Törn-Laapio
Groups
-
YMJ22S1Matkailu- ja palveluliiketoiminnan johtaminen (YAMK)
-
YHO21S1Organisaation ja talouden johtaminen (YAMK)
-
YMJ21S1Matkailu- ja palveluliiketoiminnan johtaminen (YAMK)
-
YHO22S1Organisaation ja talouden johtaminen (YAMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Vilkka, H. 2021. Tutki ja kehitä. Jyväskylä: PS Kustannus.
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage. (soveltuvin osin)
Koskela, J. Kutinlahti, P., Hanhike, T., Martikainen, M. & Urjankangas, H.-M. 2015 Kokeileva kehittäminen. Työ- ja elinkeinoelämän julkaisuja. TEM raportteja 67/2015. Viitattu 22.1.2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-327-061-9. (soveltuvin osin)
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Orientation assignment
Individual learning assignments: essays
Lectures and webinars
International connections
.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 80 h
Total 135 hours
Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course has 2-3 webinars
Further information for students
Avoin amk 43
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 04.09.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 11.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Riitta Räsänen
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Emilia Lahdenperä
Groups
-
YSY22STSosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, terveyden edistäminen
-
YSY22SKSosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, kliininen asiantuntija
-
YTR21S1Rakennustekniikan tutkinto-ohjelma (YAMK)
-
ZJAYSY22STAvoin AMK, sote, Terveyden edistäminen, YAMK-polku
-
ZJAYSY22SKAvoin AMK, sote, Kliininen asiantuntija, YAMK-polku
-
YKM21S1Musiikkipedagogi (ylempi AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
Tenttiin valmistautuminen + tentti 54 tuntia
Webinaarit 12 tuntia
Oppimistehtävät ja opiskelumateriaaliin tutustuminen 69 tuntia
verkkoluennot tai luennot tuntia
Content scheduling
Verkkototeutus. Opintojaksolla on 4 webinaaria.
Further information for students
Tentti muodostaa 50% arvosanasta
Esseekokoelma muodostaa 50% arvosanasta
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 04.09.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 11.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Riitta Räsänen
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Emilia Lahdenperä
Groups
-
YSY22SMSosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, monialainen kuntoutus
-
YSY22SKSosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, kliininen asiantuntija
-
ZJAYSY22SKAvoin AMK, sote, Kliininen asiantuntija, YAMK-polku
-
ZJAYSY22SMAvoin AMK, sote, Monialainen kuntoutus, YAMK-polku
-
YKM21S1Musiikkipedagogi (ylempi AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
Tenttiin valmistautuminen + tentti 54 tuntia
Webinaarit 12 tuntia
Oppimistehtävät ja opiskelumateriaaliin tutustuminen 69 tuntia
verkkoluennot tai luennot tuntia
Content scheduling
Verkkototeutus. Opintojaksolla on 4 webinaaria.
Further information for students
Tentti muodostaa 50% arvosanasta
Esseekokoelma muodostaa 50% arvosanasta
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
24.04.2022 - 15.06.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 100
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Digital Supply Chain Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Lifecycle Management
- Master’s Degree Programme in Logistics
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
Teachers
- Eero Aarresola
- Sanna Nieminen
Teacher in charge
Eero Aarresola
Groups
-
ZJA21STPYLOAvoin AMK, teniikka, Logistiikka
-
ZJA21STPYDTAvoin AMK, teniikka, Digitaalinen toimitusketju
-
ZJA21STVJAvoin AMK, tekniikka, Verkostojohtaminen
-
YLO21S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), logistiikka
-
YTV21S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), verkostojohtaminen
-
YTH21S1Elinkaaren hallinta (YAMK)
-
ZJA21STPYEHAvoin AMK, teniikka, Elinkaarenhallinta
-
YTM21S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), Digitaalinen toimitusketju
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro
Teaching methods
Opintojakso toteutetaan täysin verkossa eli opintojaksolla sovelletaan erilaisia verkkopedagogisia menetelmiä.
Webinaarit/verkkoluennot
Oppimistehtävät
Practical training and working life connections
Opintojaksolla laaditaan kehittämistyön suunnitelma työelämän kehittämiseksi.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti keväällä 2022. Opiskelijalla on kaksi uusintamahdollisuutta.
Student workload
webinaarit 2 h
oppimistehtävät 50 h
opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen 43 h
tenttiin valmistautuminen 40 h
Yhteensä 135 tuntia.
Further information for students
Opintojakson arviointi pohjautuu oppimistavoitteista johdettuihin arviointikriteereihin. Kokonaisarvosana muodostuu tentin ja kehittämistyön suunnitelman arvosanan keskiarvosta.
Tentti arvioidaan asteikolla 0-5
Kehittämistyön suunnitelma arvioidaan asteikolla 0-5
Hissipuhe arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.
Vertaisarviointi arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
07.02.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
15 - 20
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Sami Hoisko
Teacher in charge
Tapio Mäkelä
Groups
-
YSY21SJSosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, Sosiaali- ja terveysalan johtaminen
-
ZJA21SSYSAvoin AMK, sote, Sosiaali- ja terveysalan johtaminen, YAMK-polku
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class
Practical training and working life connections
You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 2-3 webinars..
Further information for students
Peer review, reflective self-assessment, and teacher evaluation are used as assessment methods.
Assessment of learning tasks:
Discussion, introduction - evaluation on scale accepted - to be completed
Online exam - evaluation on scale 0-5, weight 20%
Expert blog posts and responses - evaluation on scale 0-5, weight 30%
Presentation of the development method and elevator speech or pecha kucha - evaluation on scale of 0-5, weight 40%
Reflection task on evaluation in development activities - evaluation on scale of 1-5, weight 10%
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
28.01.2022 - 13.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 45
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in High-Technology Business Management
Teachers
- Hannariina Honkanen
Groups
-
ZJA21STPYTJAvoin AMK, teniikka, YAMK- polut, Teknologialiiketoiminnan johtaminen
-
YTO21S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), teknologialiiketoiminnan johtaminen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 9 h
- learning tasks 40 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
The course starts with contact lessons 28.1.2022 (at 12:00-19:00).
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
Online exam is taken in the early part of the course.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 3 webinars (24.2., 31.3. and 5.5.).
Further information for students
Arviointimenetelmät:
Reflektiivinen itsearviointi, vertaiskommentointi, jatkuva palaute ja opintojakson kokonaisarviointi verkkotenttiin ja oppimistehtäviin pohjautuen.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
24.01.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
15 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Project Management
- Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
Teachers
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Sami Hoisko
Teacher in charge
Tapio Mäkelä
Groups
-
ZJA21SSYPAvoin AMK, sote, Projektijohtaminen, YAMK-polku
-
ZJA21STPYPJAvoin AMK, teniikka, Projektijohtaminen (insinööri)
-
ZJA21SSYVAvoin AMK, sote, Verkostojohtaminen, YAMK-polku
-
YSV21S1Master's Degree Programme in Business Network Management
-
YTB21S1Projektijohtaminen YAMK (teknologia)
-
YSB21S1Projektijohtaminen YAMK
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 2-3 webinars..
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Timing
22.01.2022 - 31.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
TA16 - Biotalousinstituutti
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 24
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Bioeconomy Development
Teachers
- Laura Vertainen
- Hannariina Honkanen
Teacher in charge
Laura Vertainen
Groups
-
YLB22K1Agrologi (ylempi AMK), biotalouden kehittäminen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 2-3 webinars..
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
15.01.2022 - 30.04.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
TA11 - Teollisuustekniikka
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 60
Degree programmes
- Master's Degree Programme in Robotics
- Master's Degree Programme in Sustainable Energy
Teachers
- Janne Sundelin
- Hannariina Honkanen
Teacher in charge
Hannariina Honkanen
Groups
-
ZJA21STPYROAvoin AMK, teniikka, Robotiikka
-
YTK21S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), kestävä energia
-
ZJA21STPYKEAvoin AMK, tekniikka, Kestävä energia
-
YTG21S1Insinööri (ylempi AMK), robotiikka
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Online exam
Individual learning tasks e.g. essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 9 h
- learning tasks 40 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
The course starts with contact lessons 15.1.2021 (at 8:30-15:30).
Taking part in the course start contact lessons is also a sign of your participation in the course.
Online exam is taken in the early part of the course.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 3 webinars (10.2.2022, 17.3.2022 and 21.4.2022).
Further information for students
Arviointimenetelmät:
Reflektiivinen itsearviointi, vertaiskommentointi, jatkuva palaute ja opintojakson kokonaisarviointi verkkotenttiin ja oppimistehtäviin pohjautuen.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 13.03.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 47
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Business and Financial Management
Teachers
- Heidi Neuvonen
Groups
-
YHO21S1Organisaation ja talouden johtaminen (YAMK)
-
ZJA21SHYAvoin AMK, lita, YAMK-polut
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Time and location
Online 100%
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h
- studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 3 webinars
Further information for students
Avoin amk 10 sisältyy max-määrään
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 13.03.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 44
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Tourism and Hospitality Management
Teachers
- Tarja Niemelä
Groups
-
YMJ21S1Matkailu- ja palveluliiketoiminnan johtaminen (YAMK)
-
ZJA21SMYAvoin AMK, marata, YAMK-polut
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Online exam (based on the book written by Toikko & Rantanen, 2009)
Individual learning assignments: essays
Lectures and webinars
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h
- studying the course material 40 h
- thesis process
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hour
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 2-3 webinars
Content scheduling
The course has 3 webinars
Further information for students
avoin amk 10 sisältyy paikkamääriin max
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 01.04.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
15 - 40
Degree programmes
- Master’s Degree Programme in Health Care and Social Services
Teachers
- Tapio Mäkelä
- Emilia Lahdenperä
- Sami Hoisko
Teacher in charge
Tapio Mäkelä
Groups
-
ZJA21SSYMAvoin AMK, sote, monialainen kuntoutus, YAMK-polku
-
YSY21SMSosiaali- ja terveysalan ylempi AMK, monialainen kuntoutus
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities
Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence
Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.
Content
The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
OR
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
OR
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K. 2001. The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. 5th edition or the latest. Philadelphia : Elsevier/Saunders cop.
OR
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. 2014. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins cop.
OR
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Base line online exam
Individual learning tasks: Elevator speech, essays
Small group work online
Webinars
Online Discussions
Recorded online lectures, podcasts, or lectures in class
Practical training and working life connections
You can connect working life development projects to learning tasks of the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
It is recommended that the online exam be taken as soon as the online learning environment opens.
An unsuccessful online exam can be taken for the first time in the following month, and a second re-opportunity opens in the following month.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification
of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
-lectures/online lectures 6 h
- webinars/replacing assignments 6 h
- learning tasks 43 h -
studying the course material 40 h
- preparation for the exam 40 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Online Implementation:
Presenting on the online discussion platform is also a sign of your participation in the course. Presentation should be made at the beginning of the course during the first two weeks.
The course is modular, where it takes 2-3 weeks to complete the materials and learning tasks of the modules.
The course has 2-3 webinars..
Further information for students
Peer review, reflective self-assessment, and teacher evaluation are used as assessment methods.
Assessment of learning tasks:
Discussion, introduction - evaluation on scale accepted - to be completed
Online exam - evaluation on scale 0-5, weight 20%
Expert blog posts and responses - evaluation on scale 0-5, weight 30%
Presentation of the development method and elevator speech or pecha kucha - evaluation on scale of 0-5, weight 40%
Reflection task on evaluation in development activities - evaluation on scale of 1-5, weight 10%
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.
Further information
The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.