Skip to main content

Bachelor's Thesis, part 1Laajuus (5 cr)

Code: TTKNZ100

Credits

5 op

Teaching language

  • Finnish

Responsible person

  • Harri Peuranen

Objective

The student is able to identify development needs and problem areas in his/her own field of study and work, and knows how to design a research & development project and implement it as a thesis. He/she knows how to use reliable information from various sources in establishing the foundation and parameters of the thesis. The student is able to apply professional knowledge in and choose appropriate research & development methods and practices for his/her thesis.

EA-IV EUR-ACE Investigations: Student is able to conduct searches of literature and to use databases and other sources of information. Students are able to plan their theses process with applicable methods, experiments etc.

EA-ER EUR-ACE Engineering practice and YHTTY Working life: Student is able to select and use appropriate equipments, tools and methods and able to combine theory and practice to solve engineering problems.

YHTVI Communication Skills: Student is able to document the thesis plan and present the plan orally.

Content

- Process and procedures for the thesis
- Thesis topic and statement of the thesis problem as as a proposal
- Drafting and presentation of the thesis plan
- Source-critical information retrieval
- Academic writing and the formulation of a theoretical framework

Qualifications

Sufficient familiarity with one's own professional field and research and development methods.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The course is graded as Pass/Fail, marked as “S (Pass)” and “0 (Fail)”.
If the student does not meet the minimum criteria set for the course, the grade is 0 (Fail).The grade of the course will be corrected to match the grade of the Bachelor’s thesis (5-1) after the approval of the Bachelor’s thesis.

Pass (S)
The student
• is able to identify development needs and problem areas in his/her own field of study and work in cooperation with working life
• develops an appropriate research & development project into a thesis by applying information, methods and behavioral skills acquired from the field
• knows how to retrieve, process and critically evaluate information, theories, concepts, methods and principles from his/her own field
• is able to compile a research-based body of knowledge and cite sources in accordance with JAMK's instructions
• is able to apply professional expertise to and select appropriate research & development methods and practices for his/her research & development work
• is capable of taking responsibility for group learning and knowledge sharing

The thesis is evaluated summatively following its completion and presentation, on a five-point scale according to thesis-specific criteria: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very good), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory) and 1 (Adequate).

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The course is graded as Pass/Fail, marked as “S (Pass)” and “0 (Fail)”. If the student does not meet the minimum criteria set for the course, the grade is 0 (Fail). The grade of the course will be corrected to match the grade of the Bachelor’s thesis (5-1) after the approval of the Bachelor’s thesis.

Pass (S) The student
- is able to identify development needs and problem areas in his/her own field of study and work in cooperation with working life
- develops an appropriate research & development project into a thesis by applying information, methods and behavioral skills acquired from the field
- knows how to retrieve, process and critically evaluate information, theories, concepts, methods and principles from his/her own field
- is able to compile a research-based body of knowledge and cite sources in accordance with JAMK's instructions
- is able to apply professional expertise to and select appropriate research & development methods and practices for his/her research & development work
- is capable of taking responsibility for group learning and knowledge sharing.

The thesis is evaluated summatively following its completion and presentation, on a five-point scale according to thesis-specific criteria: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very good), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory) and 1 (Adequate).