Nutrition and Physical Activity in Health Promotion (5 cr)

Evaluation scale

0-5

Content scheduling

Alkuseminaari pidetään opintojakson ensimmäisellä viikolla. Opintojakso etenee viikottaisilla tehtävillä.

Objective

The student recognize the needs and challenges of society related to health, nutrition and physical activity. The student understands meaning of lifestyle, nutrition and physical activity to health and recognizes lifestyle factors related to nutrition and physical activity. The student can set goals promoting healthy lifestyle related to nutrition and physical activity. The student applies knowledge using professional or personal approach in practical situations and finds appropriate solutions to promote healthy lifestyle.

Content

- basics of supporting lifestyle factors
- nutrition and physical activity promoting health
- challenges in nutrition and physical actiity and setting goals
- themes related to nutrition and physical activivity
- planning, implementation and evaluation of nutrition and psysical activity counselling

Materials

Absetz, P. & Honkonen, N. 2011. Elämäntatapamuutoksen tukeminen tervyedenhuollossa: vaikuttavuus ja keinot. Duodecim 127: 21, s. 2265-2272.

Aro, A., Mutanen, M. & Uusitupa, M. (toim.). 2012. Ravitsemustiede. Duodecim.

Fogelholm, M., Vuori, I. & Vasankari, T. (toim.). 2011. Terveysliikunta. Duodecim.

UKK-instituutti. Liikkumisen suositukset. www.ukkinstituutti.fi/liikkumisensuositus

Valtion ravitsemusneuvottelukunta. 2014. Terveyttä ruoasta. Suomalaiset ravitsemussuositukset.

Täydentävä kirjallisuus, joka valitaan Case Studyn tehtävää varten.

Teaching methods

Opintojakso perustuu ensisijaisesti verkkopedagogiikkaan ja opetusmenetelminä ovat itsenäiset ja pienryhmissä tehtävät oppimistehtävät. Opintojaksolla toteutaan case stydy- oppimistehtävä, jossa pienryhmissä suunnitellaan, toteutetaan ja arvioidaan elämäntapaohjausta aidoille asiakkaille todettuihin tarpeisiin perustuen. Lisäksi opintojaksolla hyödynnetään flipped learning-menetelmää aloitus- ja lopetusseminaareissa. Seminaareihin valmistaudutaan etukäteen annettujen ohjeiden perusteella.

Employer connections

Case -tehtävä voidaan toteuttaa työelämäyhteistyössä.

Student workload

Seminaarit ja niihin valmistautuminen 1 op.

Case study 2 op.

Verkko-opiskelu itsenäisissä tehtävissä 2 op.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Excellent (5): The student participates actively taking responsibility for learning. He/she works in cooperation with other participants, develop and share knowledge. The student uses reasonably source material. Student creates new and appropriate solutions, is able to plan and implement ways of life support functions considering targets group needs. He/she is able to demonstrate an expertise of own study field. Student reports learning tasks creatively, logically, clearly and in time.

Excellent (4): The student participates actively taking responsibility for learning. He/she works in cooperation with other participants, develop and share knowledge. The student uses reasonably source material. He/she shows commendable knowledge. The student is able to plan and implement ways of life support functions considering target group needs. He/she uses new and meaningful activities. Student reports learning task logically, clearly and in time.

Good (3): The student actively participates and works with the agreed principles. He/she works in cooperation with other participants. The student uses reasonably source material. He/she shows a good knowledge. The student is able to plan and implement ways of life support functions of the target group needs. Functions are appropriate. Student reports learning task logically, clearly and in time.

Satisfactory (2): The student actively participates and works with the agreed principles. He/she works in cooperation with other participants. Student uses the learning office source material. He/she shows a satisfactory knowledge. The student is able to plan and implement ways of life support functions of the target group needs into account will be loose or missing. The circle is scarce. Students report learning tasks mainly in accordance with the instructions, but may need extratime to do study tasks.
Poor (1): The student is agreed practices. He works in cooperation with other participants. Students will use source material sparingly and examine themes from one point of view. Students plan and implement ways of life support functions of the target group needs into account and the theoretical connection is left loose or missing. The conclusions are limited. Students report learning tasks mainly with the instructions, there are difficulties to work in time. Source references are not fully correct.
Rejected (0): The student deals with the subject area, without any connections to the course learning outcomes or subject area of content processing is insufficient to meet the learning objectives agreed. The student is unable to report on the learning tasks according to the instructions.

Further information

Opintojakson tehtävien arvioinnissa hyödynnetään osaamisen määrittelyssä vertaisarviointia, itsearviointia ja opettajan antamaa palautetta.