Skip to main content

Project Work in Production Engineering 1 (5 cr)

Code: TKST0100-3001

General information


Enrollment
02.11.2020 - 30.11.2020
Registration for the implementation has ended.
Timing
01.01.2021 - 16.05.2021
Implementation has ended.
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 cr
Local portion
3 cr
Virtual portion
2 cr
Mode of delivery
Blended learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Teachers
Hannu Kivistö
Groups
TKN19SB
Konetekniikka B
Course
TKST0100
No reservations found for realization TKST0100-3001!

Evaluation scale

0-5

Objective

The students are able to apply the knowledge and skills acquired during the professional studies of mechanical engineering. They train the work methods of the industry, as well as the typical tasks of a production engineer.

Depending of the subject of the project, emphasis of the following could be different
EA-KN Knowledge and understanding: During the project the student´s systematic knowledge and understanding of the essential basic aspects and definitions deepens. At the same time student´s awareness of the wider multidisciplinary context of engineering becomes concrete.

EA-EN Engineering analysis: The student learn identify, formulate and solve engineering problems using taught methods. She/he learn to apply their knowledge and understanding when making analyses and select relevant analytic and modelling methods.

TKNVA Competence in manufacturing: The student deepens knowledge and understanding about the methods, equipment and possibilities in manufacturing.

TKNYR Competence in company finances and business: The student be trained taking business view into account when he/she makes choices.

YHTVI Communication skills: The student learn to communicate both orally and in writing in her/his mother tongue. She/he learn team working skills and is able to consider different kind of persons in the team.

Content

The students apply to practice the things learnt in the module and deepen their competence in a chosen subject.

Materials

Risto Pelin, Projektihallinnan käsikirja

Teaching methods

MUUTETTU KORONAEPIDEMIAN VUOKSI: Luennot, rymissä tai yksin tehtävät harjoitustehtävät.
Opintojaksosta kerätään sen puolivälissä vapaamuotoinen anonyymi palaute.

Exam schedules

Grade comes from project work.

Student workload

Lectures 10 hours, case study controlling 8 hours, team work 117 hours.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Excellent (5): As the previous level, however, the problem is specifically demanding and the implementation is very successful from which the client company´s representative is also agreed. From project you can identify features on innovation. During the project the student utilizes widely knowledge and understanding of other courses.

Very good (4): As the previous level, however, the problem is more demanding and the implementation is more successful. In the project´s implementation there has been utilized very much knowledge given in other courses and research work is very versatile. The student reach very well the goals specified by the client company.

Good (3): The student handle moderate demanding project´s implementation, the project has no time table problem and in implementation there has not been utilized some knowledge given in other courses. Problem solving and research work are versatile. The student reach mainly the goals specified by the client company.
The report has been written according to JAMK´s bachelor thesis report instructions. The Students role in seminar presentation is significant.

Satisfactory (2): The student has slight lacks in project´s complete implementation, the project has little time table problem nor in implementation there has not been noticeable utilized knowledge given in other courses. Problem solving is simple and research work is narrow. The student reach only partly the goals which satisfied the client company.
The report has not been wholly written according to JAMK´s bachelor thesis report instructions. The Students role in seminar presentation is humble.

Adequate (1): The student has lacks in project´s complete implementation, the project has time table problem nor in implementation there has not been utilized knowledge given in other courses. Problem solving is simple and research work is very narrow. The student reach only partly the goals which satisfied the client company.
The report has not been written according to JAMK´s bachelor thesis report instructions. The Students role in seminar presentation is humble.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good (3): The student handle moderate demanding project´s implementation, the project has no time table problem and in implementation there has not been utilized some knowledge given in other courses. Problem solving and research work are versatile. The student reach mainly the goals specified by the client company. The report has been written according to JAMK´s bachelor thesis report instructions. The Students role in seminar presentation is significant.

Very good (4): As the previous level, however, the problem is more demanding and the implementation is more successful. In the project´s implementation there has been utilized very much knowledge given in other courses and research work is very versatile. The student reach very well the goals specified by the client company.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): As the previous level, however, the problem is specifically demanding and the implementation is very successful from which the client company´s representative is also agreed. From project you can identify features on innovation. During the project the student utilizes widely knowledge and understanding of other courses.

Qualifications

The students have a basic picture of piece goods production and its development.

Further information

Oppimistehtävissä jatkuva kehittävä palaute.

Go back to top of page