Bachelor's Thesis part 2 (10 op)
Toteutuksen tunnus: TEZNZ200-3001
Toteutuksen perustiedot
- Ilmoittautumisaika
-
03.08.2020 - 30.08.2020
Ilmoittautuminen toteutukselle on päättynyt.
- Ajoitus
-
31.08.2020 - 30.08.2021
Toteutus on päättynyt.
- Opintopistemäärä
- 10 op
- Lähiosuus
- 10 op
- Toteutustapa
- Lähiopetus
- Yksikkö
- Teknologiayksikkö
- Toimipiste
- Pääkampus
- Opetuskielet
- englanti
- Koulutus
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in International Logistics (AMK)
- Opettajat
- Eero Aarresola
- Ville Karjalainen
- Marjo Turunen
- Ilkka Suur-Uski
- Juha Sipilä
- Juha Pesonen
- Mikko Somerla
- Jukka Eerola
- Mikko Ilola
- Petri Vauhkonen
- Minna Kervinen
- Petrus Syvänperä
- Jutta Nihtilä
- Tommi Franssila
- Henri Kervola
- Sanna Nieminen
- Ville Pahlsten
- Jarmo Räisänen
- Juha Paananen
- Risto Pakarinen
- Vastuuopettaja
- Tommi Franssila
- Ryhmät
-
TLE17S1Degree Programme in International Logistics
- Opintojakso
- TEZNZ200
Arviointiasteikko
0-5
Tavoitteet
The student is able to implement a research or development project that benefits working life, his/her own field of study or professional development independently, responsibly and within a cooperative network. He/she knows how to communicate his/her work at different stages clearly, correctly and graphically to a peer and other audiences. He/she knows how to report the results of his/her work, evaluate them and bring forth suggestions for development in an appropriate manner in writing, orally and visually.
Sisältö
Realization/production of the thesis
Reporting of the thesis
Written, verbal or visual disclosure of the thesis results and their publication within a community of experts
Evaluation of the thesis work process
Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)
The course is evaluated as Pass (S)/Fail (0).
Pass (S)
The student:
• implements working life, field-specific or professional knowledge from a useful research & development project independently, responsibly and in cooperation with others
• knows how to process and critically evaluate information, theories, concepts, methods and principles from his/her own field
• knows how to report the results of his/her work, evaluate them and bring forth suggestions for development in an appropriate manner in writing, orally and visually
• knows how to communicate his/her work at different stages clearly, rationally and graphically to a peer and other audiences
• is able to evaluate and develop his/her own knowledge and readiness for continuous learning
The thesis is evaluated summatively following its completion and presentation, on a five-point scale according to thesis-specific criteria: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very good), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory) and 1 (Adequate). The evaluation criteria for the thesis are published on the jamk.fi/en Web site.
Assessment methods are based on learning objectives. Assessment is qualitative, based on a criteria and the student's self-assessment plays an important role in it.
The learning outcomes of individual courses are assessed in relation to the objectives of the course concerned. Unless otherwise defined in the curriculum, a course accepted as completed is assessed either on the following five-step scale: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory), 1 (Sufficient) or it is graded as Pass/Fail, marked as “S (Pass)” and “0 (Fail)”.
If the student does not meet the minimum criteria set for the course, the grade is 0 (Fail).
Esitietovaatimukset
Sufficient familiarity with one's own professional field and research and development methods. The student has successfully compiled an approved thesis plan and theoretical framework.