Opetussuunnitelmat

Objective

You are able to discuss critically and assess different theoretical frameworks relating to digital rehabilitation. You can apply the person-centered approach when comparing and selecting various kinds of digital solutions for rehabilitation. You can explain and consider existing laws and regulations as well as ethical guidelines in the use and development of digital rehabilitation. You are aware of possible ethical dilemmas relating to digital rehabilitation and you can solve ethical problems collaborating with the multiprofessional team. You can identify and analyze the risks for data security, and you can recognize and offer solutions for the cybersecurity risks.

Content

• International frameworks of person-centered digital rehabilitation
• Technology acceptance models
• Legislation relating to digital rehabilitation (e.g., GDPR)
• Ethical questions relating to digitalization in rehabilitation
• Cybersecurity in digital rehabilitation

Evaluation scale

0-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

0 (fail)
You are not able to name any theoretical framework of legislation issue relating to digital rehabilitation. You can’t give any justify solution for possible ethical issues relating to digital rehabilitation You haven’t participated in the lessons or conversations in any way. You haven’t submitted the assignments asked and/or your assignment have indications of plagiarims.

1 (sufficient level)
You can name one or two theoretical frameworks relating to digital rehabilitation but your ability to link the theory in practice is limited. You can name the basic ethical guidelines but your ability to recognize ethical conflicts in different contexts is limited. You can recognize some cybersecurity risks but your ability to resolve problems is limited. Your written assignments contain some information about the legislation relating to digital rehabilitation. You have used some theoretical knowledge in your assignment(s). You have participated occasionally and a little in conversations in online environment and/or lessons


2 (satisfactory level)
You can use different theoretical frameworks relating to digital rehabilitation and link them to practice. You can use the basic ethical guidelines but your ability to recognize ethical conflicts in different contexts is limited. You can recognize cybersecurity risks. Your written assignments contain some up-to-date information, but it should be extended to broader contexts. You have used theoretical knowledge in your assignment(s). You have participated actively in conversations both in an online learning environment and lessons.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

3 (good level)
You understand the difference between different kinds of theoretical frameworks and their practical implications when you are talking about digital rehabilitation. You can justify your actions by using up-to-date knowledge in different contexts. You can evaluate different kinds of digital rehabilitation situations and you are trying to takie into account ethical and security issues. You can advise clients in matters related to cybersecurity. You are using relevant source material in your structured assignment(s). You have participated actively in conversations both in an online learning environment and lessons and you have offered new kinds of perspectives to the conversation.

4 (very good)
You can explain the difference between different kinds of theoretical frameworks and their practical implications when you are talking about digital rehabilitation. You can justify your actions by using up-to-date knowledge of both national and international legislation. You can evaluate critically different kinds of digital rehabilitation situations by taking into account ethical and security issues. You can advise both your peers and clients in matters related to cybersecurity. You are using extensive source material in your structured and argument assignment. You have participated actively in conversations both in an online learning environment and lessons and you have offered new kinds of perspectives to the conversation.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 (excellent)
You can explain diversely the difference of different kinds of theoretical frameworks and their practical implications when you are talking about digital rehabilitation. You can justify your actions by using up-to-date knowledge of both national and international legislation. You can evaluate critically different kinds of digital rehabilitation situations by taking into account ethical and security issues. You can advise both your peers and clients in matters related to cybersecurity. You are using diverse source material in your well-structured and well-argument assignment. You have participated actively in conversations both in an online learning environment and lessons and you have offered solution oriented and new kinds of perspectives to the conversation.

Objective

You are able to discuss critically and assess different theoretical frameworks relating to digital rehabilitation. You can apply the person-centered approach when comparing and selecting various kinds of digital solutions for rehabilitation. You can explain and consider existing laws and regulations as well as ethical guidelines in the use and development of digital rehabilitation. You are aware of possible ethical dilemmas relating to digital rehabilitation and you can solve ethical problems collaborating with the multiprofessional team. You can identify and analyze the risks for data security, and you can recognize and offer solutions for the cybersecurity risks.

Content

• International frameworks of person-centered digital rehabilitation
• Technology acceptance models
• Legislation relating to digital rehabilitation (e.g., GDPR)
• Ethical questions relating to digitalization in rehabilitation
• Cybersecurity in digital rehabilitation

Teaching methods

Webinars, lecture recordings, independent and group assignment (discussions, essay, learning tasks)

Online learning, Flipped learning, Interactive lecture,

Employer connections

Assignments can be linked to your own work

Exam schedules

No exams

International connections

Assignments can be linked to the international projects.

Student workload

- Webinars and lecture recording 27 h (1 ECTS credits)
- Searching and reading material 54 h (2 ECTS credits)
- Individual and group assignments 54 h (2 ECTS credits)
Total of 135 h (5 ECTS credits)

Further information

Intermediate tasks will be assessed approved-fail,
the essay will be assessed numerically

Evaluation scale

0-5

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

0 (fail)
You are not able to name any theoretical framework of legislation issue relating to digital rehabilitation. You can’t give any justify solution for possible ethical issues relating to digital rehabilitation You haven’t participated in the lessons or conversations in any way. You haven’t submitted the assignments asked and/or your assignment have indications of plagiarims.

1 (sufficient level)
You can name one or two theoretical frameworks relating to digital rehabilitation but your ability to link the theory in practice is limited. You can name the basic ethical guidelines but your ability to recognize ethical conflicts in different contexts is limited. You can recognize some cybersecurity risks but your ability to resolve problems is limited. Your written assignments contain some information about the legislation relating to digital rehabilitation. You have used some theoretical knowledge in your assignment(s). You have participated occasionally and a little in conversations in online environment and/or lessons


2 (satisfactory level)
You can use different theoretical frameworks relating to digital rehabilitation and link them to practice. You can use the basic ethical guidelines but your ability to recognize ethical conflicts in different contexts is limited. You can recognize cybersecurity risks. Your written assignments contain some up-to-date information, but it should be extended to broader contexts. You have used theoretical knowledge in your assignment(s). You have participated actively in conversations both in an online learning environment and lessons.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

3 (good level)
You understand the difference between different kinds of theoretical frameworks and their practical implications when you are talking about digital rehabilitation. You can justify your actions by using up-to-date knowledge in different contexts. You can evaluate different kinds of digital rehabilitation situations and you are trying to takie into account ethical and security issues. You can advise clients in matters related to cybersecurity. You are using relevant source material in your structured assignment(s). You have participated actively in conversations both in an online learning environment and lessons and you have offered new kinds of perspectives to the conversation.

4 (very good)
You can explain the difference between different kinds of theoretical frameworks and their practical implications when you are talking about digital rehabilitation. You can justify your actions by using up-to-date knowledge of both national and international legislation. You can evaluate critically different kinds of digital rehabilitation situations by taking into account ethical and security issues. You can advise both your peers and clients in matters related to cybersecurity. You are using extensive source material in your structured and argument assignment. You have participated actively in conversations both in an online learning environment and lessons and you have offered new kinds of perspectives to the conversation.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 (excellent)
You can explain diversely the difference of different kinds of theoretical frameworks and their practical implications when you are talking about digital rehabilitation. You can justify your actions by using up-to-date knowledge of both national and international legislation. You can evaluate critically different kinds of digital rehabilitation situations by taking into account ethical and security issues. You can advise both your peers and clients in matters related to cybersecurity. You are using diverse source material in your well-structured and well-argument assignment. You have participated actively in conversations both in an online learning environment and lessons and you have offered solution oriented and new kinds of perspectives to the conversation.