Curricula

Objectives

Purpose of the course
The purpose of this course is to understand the meaning of an research-based development and to get own toolkit for development activities

Competences
Ethical competence
Learning and information management competence
Entrepreneurship, innovation and working community competence

Learning outcomes
After completing this course, you will understand the difference between scientific research and research-based development. You understand the principles of research-based development,, its methodological starting points. You know the process of research-based development. You master and are able to apply some working life development methods in development activitvities at your filed of practice. You understand the importance of research ethics and good scientific practice in research-based development.
.

Content

The starting points and methodology of research-based development
Research ethics and the responsible conduct of research
Process and management of research-based development
Research and development methods, data collection and data analysis
Assessment as part of research-based development

Learning materials and recommended literature

Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino
Ojasalo, K., Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro

Teaching methods

Opintojakso toteutetaan täysin verkossa eli opintojaksolla sovelletaan erilaisia verkkopedagogisia menetelmiä.
Webinaarit/verkkoluennot
Oppimistehtävät

Practical training and working life connections

Opintojaksolla laaditaan kehittämistyön suunnitelma työelämän kehittämiseksi.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Verkkotentti keväällä 2023. Opiskelijalla on kaksi uusintamahdollisuutta.

Student workload

webinaarit 4 h
oppimistehtävät 50 h
opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen 41 h
tenttiin valmistautuminen 40 h
Yhteensä 135 tuntia.

Further information for students

Opintojakson arviointi pohjautuu oppimistavoitteista johdettuihin arviointikriteereihin.

Tentti arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Kehittämistyön suunnitelma arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty/hylätty
Hissipuhe arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty.
Vertaisarviointi arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty - hylätty

Evaluation scale

Pass/Fail

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Sufficient 1
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to describe the different stages of the development process and choose methods suitable for their research/development topic. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Satisfactory 2
The student understands the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student describes the stages of the development process and chooses methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Good 3
The student is able to compare the differences and similarities between research-based development and academic research. The student is able to analyse development processes, methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability with the help of literature. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Very good 4
The student compares the similarities and differences between research-based development and academic research in a diverse way. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and reflects on and assesses their suitability critically and with the help of literature.The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent 5
The student is able to critically assess research-based development. The student describes the stages of the development process with justifications, applies methods suitable for their development topic, and critically assesses their suitability for development work in the field. The student understands the significance of research ethics in research-based development.

Further information

The course can be studied by using studification combiningn study & work in accordance with the
JAMK Degree regulation 17 § the guidelines for identifying and recognizing competence and the JAMK processes.