Terapeuttinen harjoittelu (10cr)

Evaluation scale

0-5

Objective

Part 1: Based on functionality assessment, the student is able to design methods that support the measures of assisting patients, training their respiratory and cardiovascular functions, and supporting their mental functions. The student is able to apply various guidance and training methods in a target-oriented way.
Part 2: The student familiarizes him/herself with the principles of exercising muscular and joint functioning, and with the methods of physical therapy, utilizing the knowledge available on exercise physiology and neurophysiology, and on biomechanics.
Part 3: The student is able to apply the principles of motoric learning/guidance and masters physiotherapeutic exercise methods used to prevent, repair and compensate for functional impairments, and to maintain/improve clients’ remaining functional ability to enhance their performance and participation.

Content

Part 1: Factors facilitating motion and movement; anatomical and physiological movements, assisting patients with different tools and in different conditions. Exercising daily functions. Applications of exercising cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Basics and methods of relaxation, principles of exercises strengthening the body image, and training.
Part 2: Measuring of strength qualities (EMG, isometric strength measurement devices). Methods and applications of strength training (static, maximum and speed strength), and the basics of the stretching method.
Part 3: Exercising body control in different positions, moving from one position to another, and moving in different positions. Exercising fine motor functions.
Play guidance for various age groups; exercise of concentration, attentiveness and perceptual functions.
Use of exercise tools.
Main principles of neurotherapeutic methods.

Materials

Aalto,R.2007. Functional Training: toiminnallisempaa lihaskuntoharjoittelua. Hall,Carrie & Brody.2010. Therapeutic Exercise: Moving toward function. Herrala,J, Hämäläinen,P., Järvinen,M & Karivaara,E. (eds) 2000. Hengityshoito 4. Etelä-Suomen Keuhkovammayhdistys.Hämeenlinna.Häkkinen,K. 2004. Urheiluvalmennus. Keskinen,K., Häkkinen,K. & Kallinen,M. 2007. Kuntotestauksen käsikirja Mero,A., Nummela,A. Keskinen,K. & . O´Sullivan.2006. Physical Rehabilitation Richardson et al:Terapeuttinen harjoittelu ja keskivartalon hallinta 2005. Rose,D.J. 2003. FallProof. A Comprehensive Balance and Mobility Training Program. Tamminen,L et al. 2007. Potilaan siirtymisen ergonominen avustaminen. Opettajan käsikirja. Sosiaali-ja terveysministeriö 6. Ylinen,J. 2010.Venytystekniikat, Lihas- ja jännesysteemi.

Completion alternatives

Active participation in class work and exercises. Part 1: Learning diary 25% and guidance assignments 75% Part 2: Written exam 50% and practical exam 50% Part 3: Assignment 50% and practical exam 50% The course grade is the average of the grades of the 3 parts of the course.

Student workload

Lectures and exercises 170 h Assignments and independent study 100 h Total 270 h

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Excellent (5) and Very good (4)
The student possesses extensive knowledge and skills, justifies his/her actions, and creates new solutions. Manual work is skilful and conclusions justified. The student pays attention to ergonomics, is capable of self-assessment to improve him/herself and peer assessment. In his/her written tasks, the student demonstrates an ability to describe and justify the phenomena of the subject area critically through one's own thinking and by utilizing sources appropriately and in a variety of ways. The student complies with the instructions on JAMK's written work.

Good (3)
The student possesses good knowledge and skills, justifies his/her actions, and tries to combine and apply knowledge and skills. His/her manual work is fluent, conclusions correct, and he/she pays attention to ergonomics in his/her activities. The student is capable of self-assessment and peer assessment. In his/her written tasks, the student demonstrates an ability to describe and justify the phenomena of the subject area by utilizing sources appropriately and in a variety of ways. The student complies with the instructions on JAMK's written work.

Satisfactory and Adequate (2-1)
The student assesses him/herself and fellow students. The student has completed the tasks agreed. In his/her work, very little to connect between the things presented can be found; reflexion is scanty. Nevertheless, there are references to the literature of the field and source references have been used.

Fail (0)
The student's knowledge is lacking, actuation and manual work is illogical and unsure, and he/she pays no attention to ergonomics. The student is not capable of self-assessment. In written work, the student has not familiarized him/herself with the subject area related to the work. The things presented repeat the lecture material, are disconnected or inappropriate; use of sources is irregular.

Qualifications

Knowledge of anatomy and physiology
Competence in functionality assessment

Further information

-