Research and DevelopmentLaajuus (5 cr)
Code: ZZPP0620
Credits
5 op
Teaching language
- Finnish
- English
Responsible person
- Laura Vertainen, Teknologia
- Riikka Ahlgren, Liiketoiminta
- Harri Peuranen, Teknologia
- Raija Hämäläinen, Teknologia
- Pasi Lehtola, Teknologia
- Minna Haapakoski, Hyvinvointi
- Piotr Krawczyk, IB, Study Abroad (Kedge BS)
- Anu Manner, Tiimiakatemia
- Jarkko Immonen, Tietojenkäsittely
- Mika Karhulahti, Business Inf. Technology
- Pauliina Soanvaara, Hyvinvointi
Objective
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
17.03.2025 - 19.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Katri Ylönen
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Groups
-
SFT23SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT23SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
STT22S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT22SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR23S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SKO22SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
-
SKO23SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Verkko-opetus, webinaarit Zoomissa:
1. Aloitus ja Jamkin opinnäytetyön prosessi: ti 18.3. klo 12-15
2. Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja tutkimusetiikka: ti 25.3. klo 12-15
3. Määrällinen tutkimus: ti 1.4. klo 12-15
4. Laadullinen tutkimus: ti 8.4. klo 12-15
5. Kirjallisuuskatsaus: ti 15.4. klo 12-15
6. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta: ti 22.4. klo 12-15
Teaching methods
Aktiivinen osallistuminen Zoom-webinaareihin, jotka sisältävät pienryhmätyöskentelyä.
Itsenäinen työskentely sisältää ennakkotehtävien tekemistä, materiaaleihin sekä menetelmäkirjallisuuteen perehtymistä ja näihin liittyvää tiedonhankintaa.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti Moodlessa: ti 29.4. klo 12-13
Verkkotentti Moodlessa, ensimmäinen uusinta (I): ti 6.5. klo 12-13
Verkkotentti Moodlessa, toinen uusinta (II): ti 13.5. klo 12-13
Student workload
5 x 27 h = 135
Aihe-ehdotusharjoitus.
Ennakko- ja oppimistehtävä: tutkimusetiikka ja hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö.
Ennakko- ja oppimistehtävät eri tutkimusmenetelmiin (4) liittyen.
Tenttikirjallisuuden ja luentodiojen lukeminen.
Further information for students
Oppimistehtävät arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty-hylätty.
Opintojakson arvosana perustuu tenttisuoritukseen (100 %).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
17.03.2025 - 19.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Groups
-
SFT23SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT23SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
STT22S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT22SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR23S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SKO22SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
-
SKO23SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Verkko-opetus, webinaarit Zoomissa:
1. Aloitus ja Jamkin opinnäytetyön prosessi: ke 19.3. klo 12-15
2. Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja tutkimusetiikka: ke 26.3. klo 12-15
3. Määrällinen tutkimus: ke 2.4. klo 12-15
4. Laadullinen tutkimus: ke 9.4. klo 12-15
5. Kirjallisuuskatsaus: ke 16.4. klo 12-15
6. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta: ke 23.4. klo 12-15
Teaching methods
Active participation in Zoom webinars, which include small group work. Independent work, which includes preliminary tasks, familiarisation with materials and methodological literature and related information gathering.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti Moodlessa: ti 29.4. klo 12-13
Verkkotentti Moodlessa, ensimmäinen uusinta (I): ti 6.5. klo 12-13
Verkkotentti Moodlessa, toinen uusinta (II): ti 13.5. klo 12-13
Student workload
5 x 27 h = 135
Aihe-ehdotusharjoitus.
Ennakko- ja oppimistehtävä: tutkimusetiikka ja hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö.
Ennakko- ja oppimistehtävät eri tutkimusmenetelmiin (4) liittyen.
Tenttikirjallisuuden ja luentodiojen lukeminen.
Further information for students
The coursework is graded on a pass-fail scale. The grade for the course is based on the examination (100%).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
10.03.2025 - 11.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Marjo Palovaara
- Suleiman Kamau
Teacher in charge
Suleiman Kamau
Groups
-
SNS25VKBachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing, vaihto-opiskelu/Exchange studies
-
SNS23SG2Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti tehdään opintojaksolla ilmoitettuna valvottuna ajankohtana.
Hylätyn verkkotentin voi suorittaa uusintakerroilla (2 kpl)
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 30.04.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV22S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S4Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material in Moodle workspace.
Teaching methods
Online implementation - webinars and lectures in Zoom, online guidance, independent study, assignments completed in small groups, learning assignments.
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Link to Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
There is no exam in the course. The assignments and project assignments with their timetables are presented in the first webinar (mandatory attendance).
Alternative completion methods
The methods of accreditation are described in the Degree Regulations and study guide. The course lecturer will provide information on the specific practices of the course.
Student workload
The course is 5 ECTS = 135 hrs of student work (1 ECTS=27hrs student work)
- webinars and online guidance approx. 40 hrs
- independent study (material and assignments) approx. 30 hrs
- assignments and course assignment approx. 65 hrs
Content scheduling
Online implementation in Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinars on Mondays at 15-17.30 (the first webinar 13.1.2025)
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Further information for students
The course is assessed with 0-5 scale. The assessment criteria are presented in the first webinar (mandatory attendance).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 30.04.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV22S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S4Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material in Moodle workspace.
Teaching methods
Online implementation - webinars and lectures in Zoom, online guidance, independent study, assignments completed in small groups, learning assignments.
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Link to Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
There is no exam in the course. The assignments and project assignments with their timetables are presented in the first webinar (mandatory attendance).
Alternative completion methods
The methods of accreditation are described in the Degree Regulations and study guide. The course lecturer will provide information on the specific practices of the course.
Student workload
The course is 5 ECTS = 135 hrs of student work (1 ECTS=27hrs student work)
- webinars and online guidance approx. 40 hrs
- independent study (material and assignments) approx. 30 hrs
- assignments and course assignment approx. 65 hrs
Content scheduling
Online implementation in Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinars on Thursdays at 13-15.30 (the first webinar 16.1.2025).
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Further information for students
The course is assessed with 0-5 scale. The assessment criteria are presented in the first webinar (mandatory attendance).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 30.04.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV22SMTieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22SM2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA22KMASähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA22KMInsinööri (AMK), sähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka,monimuototeutus
-
TSA22KMSSähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material in Moodle workspace.
Teaching methods
Online implementation - webinars and lectures in Zoom, online guidance, independent study, assignments completed in small groups, learning assignments.
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Link to Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
There is no exam in the course. The assignments and project assignments with their timetables are presented in the first webinar (mandatory attendance).
Alternative completion methods
The methods of accreditation are described in the Degree Regulations and study guide. The course lecturer will provide information on the specific practices of the course.
Student workload
The course is 5 ECTS = 135 hrs of student work (1 ECTS=27hrs student work)
- webinars and online guidance approx. 40 hrs
- independent study (material and assignments) approx. 30 hrs
- assignments and course assignment approx. 65 hrs
Content scheduling
Online implementation in Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinars on Thursdays at 16-18.30 (the first webinar 16.1.2025)
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Further information for students
The course is assessed with 0-5 scale. The assessment criteria are presented in the first webinar (mandatory attendance).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 14.03.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Groups
-
SFT23SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT23SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
STT22S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT22SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR23S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SKO22SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
-
SKO23SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
1. Start of the course
2. Good Scientific Practice
3. Quantitative research
4. Qualitative research
5. Literature review
6. Research development activities
Teaching methods
You participate in teaching at school, which includes small group work. You will carry out pre- and in-class assignments independently, familiarise yourself with course materials and methodological literature, and search for information related to research and development activities
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Tentti ma 3.3. klo 12-13
Ensimmäinen uusinta pe 7.3. klo 12-13
Toinen uusinta ke 12.3. klo 12-13
Further information for students
Oppimistehtävät arvioidaan hyväksytty - hylätty.
Opintojakso arvioidaan tentin perusteella ja tästä muodostuu 100% opintojakson arvosana.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 30.04.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
20 - 36
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Purchasing and Logistics Engineering
Teachers
- Marjo Turunen
Groups
-
TLP22S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Purchasing and Logistics Engineering
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This course is for Purchasing and Logistics Engineering / International Logistics students only.
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons, self-studying, group works and assignments.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
This course doesn´t have a final exam.
Student workload
Contact lessons 29 h
Independent studying and Learning assignments 90 h
Thesis subject 16 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 19.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
TA50 - Terveysala
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Teachers
- Pauliina Soanvaara
- Tiina Blek
Groups
-
SAR24K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SOK24K1Kätilö (AMK), päivätoteutus
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 18.11.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 19.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 25
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Henri Kervola
Groups
-
TLS23KMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS23SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS25KMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS24KMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS24SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
The course is intended for logistics distance learning students. The course should be completed in the semester preceding the semester in which you intend to complete your thesis. The course includes online lectures and assignments. The first assignment of the course must be completed within three weeks of the first few days of the course. Those who fail to complete the assignment will be removed from the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Student workload
Yksi opintopiste tarkoittaa laskennallisesti keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä eli viiden opintopisteen opintojakson kuormitus on noin 135 h.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 30.04.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 57
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Anna Riikonen
Groups
-
TLS22S1Logistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Spring semester 2024.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This implementation is for logistics full-time students. Course includes three contact lessons and three workshops. Participating in workshops depends on your own progress. The course consists of three learning tasks, two of those are pair-tasks and one is completed individually. The course also includes self-studying.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
No final exam.
Alternative completion methods
The admission procedures are described in the degree rule and the study guide. The teacher of the course will give you more information on possible specific course practices.
Student workload
One credit corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work, which means that the load of five credits is approximately 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 19.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 60
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Technology
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Harri Peuranen
Groups
-
TER22SMEnergia- ja ympäristötekniikka (AMK)
-
TKN22SMKonetekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
The course's Moodle learning environment will open on 6.1.2025.
Kananen, J. 2015. Online Research for Preparing your Thesis. Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 198.
Kananen, J. 2011. Rafting Through the Thesis Process: Step by Step Guide to thesis Process. . Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 114.Field-specific methodological literature.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Teaching methods
NOTE: The first and only introductory webinar is mandatory. If a student does not participate in it, they will be removed from the course. In case of a justified reason for absence, the responsible teacher must be notified in advance before the aforementioned webinar. A substitute task, which is accepted and entitles participation in the course, will be assigned to replace attendance.
Zoom-guidance times on a monthly basis based on individual needs.
Information retrieval and applied learning tasks. Through problem-based learning, students have tasks to solve. Some learning tasks are done in groups and some individually.
The responsible and transparent use of AI applications is encouraged in this course. Instructions for using artificial intelligence can be found in chapter 3.2 (https://help.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/fi/3-kirjoittamisprosessi/tekoalyn-kaytto-oppimistehtavissa-ja-opinnaytetyossa/) of the thesis reporting instructions.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The course does not include any formal exams.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online contact sessions 5 learning work hours
- learning tasks 85 learning work hours
- studying the course material ans literature 45 learning work hours.
Total 135 learning work hours.
Content scheduling
Webinars Spring 2025:
- Introduction: Week 3, 2 hours (January)
- Q&A and Guidance: Week 6, 1 hour (February)
- Q&A and Guidance: Week 10, 1 hour (March)
- Q&A and Guidance: Week 14, 1 hour (April)
Participation in the introductory session is also a confirmation of your enrollment in the course. During the introductory session, the first learning tasks will be assigned. The course will end on May 19, 2025.
Further information for students
Assessment Methods:
Reflective self-assessment, peer feedback, continuous feedback, and overall course evaluation based on learning tasks and a proficiency test.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
13.01.2025 - 14.03.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
- Degree Programme in Social Services
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Groups
-
SAR23S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Webinars on Zoom:
1.Start of the course
2.Good Scientific Practice
3.Quantitative research
4.Qualitative research
5.Literature review
6.Research development activities
Teaching methods
Active participation in Zoom webinars, which include small group work. Independent work, which includes preliminary tasks, familiarisation with materials and methodological literature and related information gathering.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Exam
Further information for students
The coursework is graded on a pass-fail scale. The grade for the course is based on the examination (100%).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
18.11.2024 - 09.01.2025
Timing
01.01.2025 - 31.05.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Institute of Bioeconomy
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Agricultural and Rural Industries
Teachers
- Laura Vertainen
Groups
-
LMS22KMAgrologi (AMK), maaseutuelinkeinot, monimuotototeutus
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 40 h
- learning tasks 65 h
- studying the course material 30 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
28.10.2024 - 20.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Minna Haapakoski
Groups
-
STT22SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SOS22SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR23K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SKO22SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Elo, S., Kajula, O., Tohmola, A. & Kääriäinen M. (2022) Laadullisen sisällönanalyysin vaiheet ja eteneminen https://journal.fi/hoitotiede/article/view/128987/78028
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Teaching methods
Virtual meetings
Independent work
Group work
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Webinars:
Ke 30.10.24 klo 8.30-11.30
Ke 6.11.24 klo 8.30-11.30
Ke 13.11.24 klo 8.30-11.30
Ke 20.11.24 klo 8.30-11.30
Ke 27.11.24 klo 8.30-11.30
Ke 4.12.24 klo 8.30-11.30
Exams::
1 exam 10.12.24 klo 9-10 (webinaari)
1 replay of the exam 17.12.24 klo 9-10 (webinaari)
2 replay of the exam 20.12.24 klo 9-10 (webinaari)
Student workload
5 x 27 h = 135h
Introduction and familiarisation with Moodle workspace 4h
Webinars 18h
Thesis proposal exercise 5h
Preliminary assignment on good scientific practice 4h
Preliminary and learning tasks related to different research methods (4) 50h
Reading of exam literature and lectures 58h
Further information for students
Learning tasks are assessed on a approved-fail scale.
The course grade is based on the examination (100%).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
28.10.2024 - 20.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
TA51 - Kuntoutusinstituutti
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Minna Haapakoski
Groups
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT22SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR22S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22SM2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SOS22SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR22S2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SKO22SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
1. Aloitus ja Jamkin opinnäytetyön prosessi: ti 29.10. klo 12-15
2. Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja tutkimusetiikka: ti 5.11. klo 12-15
3. Määrällinen tutkimus: ti 12.11. klo 12-15
4. Laadullinen tutkimus: ti 19.11. klo 12-15
5. Kirjallisuuskatsaus: ti 26.11. klo 12-15
6. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta: ti 3.12. klo 12-15
Teaching methods
Aktiivinen osallistuminen Zoom-webinaareihin, jotka sisältävät pienryhmätyöskentelyä.
Itsenäinen työskentely, joka sisältää ennakkotehtävien tekemistä, materiaaleihin sekä menetelmäkirjallisuuteen perehtymistä ja näihin liittyvää tiedonhankintaa.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti Moodlessa: ti 10.12. klo 12-13
Verkkotentti Moodlessa, ensimmäinen uusinta (I): ti 17.12. klo 12-13
Verkkotentti Moodlessa, toinen uusinta (II): pe 20.12. klo 12-13
Student workload
5 x 27 h = 135
Aihe-ehdotusharjoitus.
Ennakkotehtävä hyvätieteellinen käytäntö.
Ennakko- ja oppimistehtävät eri tutkimusmenetelmiin (4) liittyen.
Tenttikirjallisuuden ja luentodiojen lukeminen.
Further information for students
Oppimistehtävät arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty-hylätty.
Opintojakson arvosana perustuu tenttisuoritukseen (100 %).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
04.10.2024 - 31.01.2025
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Finnish Music Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Music Pedagogue
Teachers
- Eeva Oksala
Groups
-
KPD22S1Musiikkipedagogi (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Syyskuu 2024 Ennakkotehtävä, itsenäistä työskentelyä (Moodle)
4.10.2024-31.1.2025 Verkkoluennot perjantaisin 8.45-11.45 Zoomissa
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 18.08.2024
Timing
02.09.2024 - 31.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Marjo Palovaara
- Suleiman Kamau
Teacher in charge
Suleiman Kamau
Groups
-
SNS23SG1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
-
SNS24VSBachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing, vaihto-opiskelu/Exchange studies
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti tehdään opintojaksolla ilmoitettuna valvottuna ajankohtana.
Hylätyn verkkotentin voi suorittaa uusintakerroilla (2 kpl)
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Electrical and Automation Engineering
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV22S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA21SASähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA21SBSähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA21S1Sähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S4Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material in Moodle workspace.
Teaching methods
Online implementation - webinars and lectures in Zoom, online guidance, independent study, assignments completed in small groups, learning assignments.
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Link to Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
There is no exam in the course. The assignments and project assignments with their timetables are presented in the first webinar (mandatory attendance).
Alternative completion methods
The methods of accreditation are described in the Degree Regulations and study guide. The course lecturer will provide information on the specific practices of the course.
Student workload
The course is 5 ECTS = 135 hrs of student work (1 ECTS=27hrs student work)
- webinars and online guidance approx. 40 hrs
- independent study (material and assignments) approx. 30 hrs
- assignments and course assignment approx. 65 hrs
Content scheduling
Online implementation in Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinars on Thursdays at 12-13.30 (the first webinar 5.9.2024)
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Further information for students
The course is assessed with 0-5 scale. The assessment criteria are presented in the first webinar 5.9.2024 (mandatory attendance).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV22S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S4Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material in Moodle workspace.
Teaching methods
Online implementation - webinars and lectures in Zoom, online guidance, independent study, assignments completed in small groups, learning assignments.
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Link to Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
There is no exam in the course. The assignments and project assignments with their timetables are presented in the first webinar 5.9.2024 (mandatory attendance).
Alternative completion methods
The methods of accreditation are described in the Degree Regulations and study guide. The course lecturer will provide information on the specific practices of the course.
Student workload
The course is 5 ECTS = 135 hrs of student work (1 ECTS=27hrs student work)
- webinars and online guidance approx. 40 hrs
- independent study (material and assignments) approx. 30 hrs
- assignments and course assignment approx. 65 hrs
Content scheduling
Online implementation in Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinars on Thursdays at 14-15.30 (the first webinar 5.9.2024)
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Further information for students
The course is assessed with 0-5 scale. The assessment criteria are presented in the first webinar 5.9.2024 (mandatory attendance).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Electrical and Automation Engineering
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV22S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22SMTieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22S4Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV22SM2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA22KMASähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA22KMSSähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material in Moodle workspace.
Teaching methods
Online implementation - webinars and lectures in Zoom, online guidance, independent study, assignments completed in small groups, learning assignments.
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Link to Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
There is no exam in the course. The assignments and project assignments with their timetables are presented in the first webinar 29.8.2024 (mandatory attendance).
Alternative completion methods
The methods of accreditation are described in the Degree Regulations and study guide. The course lecturer will provide information on the specific practices of the course.
Student workload
The course is 5 ECTS = 135 hrs of student work (1 ECTS=27 hrs student work)
- webinars and online guidance approx. 40 hrs
- independent study (material and assignments) approx. 30 hrs
- assignments and course assignment approx. 65 hrs
Content scheduling
Online implementation in Zoom: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinars on Thursdays at 16-18.30 (the first webinar 5.9.2024)
Attendance in webinars is compulsory and absence is an exception.
Further information for students
The course is assessed with 0-5 scale. The assessment criteria are presented in the first webinar 5.9.2024 (mandatory attendance).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 60
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Construction and Civil Engineering
Teachers
- Heidi Hämäläinen-Laitinen
Groups
-
TRY21S1Rakennus- ja yhdyskuntatekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This course is for Construction and Civil Engineering students only.
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons, self-studying, group works and assignments at Rajakatu campus.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
This course doesn´t have a final exam.
Student workload
Contact lessons 29 h
Independent studying and Learning assignments 90 h
Thesis subject 16 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 60
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Technology
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Harri Peuranen
Groups
-
TKN22SAKonetekniikka (AMK)
-
TKN22SBKonetekniikka (AMK)
-
TER22S1Energia- ja ympäristötekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Kananen, J. 2015. Online Research for Preparing your Thesis. Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 198.
Kananen, J. 2011. Rafting Through the Thesis Process: Step by Step Guide to thesis Process. . Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 114.Field-specific methodological literature.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Teaching methods
NOTE: The first and only introductory webinar is mandatory. If a student does not participate in it, they will be removed from the course. In case of a justified reason for absence, the responsible teacher must be notified in advance before the aforementioned webinar. A substitute task, which is accepted and entitles participation in the course, will be assigned to replace attendance.
Zoom-guidance times on a monthly basis based on individual needs.
Information retrieval and applied learning tasks. Through problem-based learning, students have tasks to solve. Some learning tasks are done in groups and some individually.
The responsible and transparent use of AI applications is encouraged in this course. Instructions for using artificial intelligence can be found in chapter 3.2 (https://help.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/fi/3-kirjoittamisprosessi/tekoalyn-kaytto-oppimistehtavissa-ja-opinnaytetyossa/) of the thesis reporting instructions.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online contact sessions 5 learning work hours
- learning tasks 85 learning work hours
- studying the course material ans literature 45 learning work hours.
Total 135 learning work hours.
Content scheduling
- Introduction: Wednesday 4.9.2024 from 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM
- Q&A and guidance: Wednesday, 25.9.2024, from 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM
- Q&A and guidance: Wednesday, 23.10.2024, from 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM
- Q&A and guidance: Wednesday, 6.11.2024, from 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM
Participation in the introductory session serves as confirmation of your participation in the course.
During the introductory session, the first assignments will be given. The course ends on 15.12.2024.
Further information for students
Evaluation methods:
Reflective self-evaluation, peer commentary, continuous feedback and overall evaluation of the course based on the learning tasks.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Tuula Kotikoski
Groups
-
TIC22S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material in Moodle workspace.
Reference literature:
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Kananen, J. 2011. Rafting through the thesis process : step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylä : JAMK University of Applied Sciences, 2011
Teaching methods
Online implementation:
Lessons online as webinar sessions and weekly online guidance sessions in Zoom (4 hrs/week)
Independent study, group and individual assignments
Link to Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/9925791129
Exam dates and retake possibilities
There is no exam in the course. The assignments and project assignments with their timetables are presented in the first webinar.
Alternative completion methods
The methods of accreditation are described in the Degree Regulations and study guide. The course lecturer will provide information on the specific practices of the course.
Student workload
The course is 5 ECTS = 135 hrs of student work (1 ECTS=27hrs student work)
- webinars and online lectures approx. 20 hrs
- independent study (material and assignments) approx. 40 hrs
- assignments and course assignment approx. 75hrs
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Aikataulu ilmoitetaan myöhemmin.
Further information for students
The course is assessed with 0-5 scale. The assessment criteria are presented in the first webinar.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
15 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Purchasing and Logistics Engineering
Teachers
- Marjo Turunen
Groups
-
TLP21S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Purchasing and Logistics Engineering
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
Welcome to this course if you are a student of Purchasing and Logistics Engineering / International Logistics and you are about to start your thesis during winter 2024.
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons, self-studying, group works and assignments at Rajakatu campus.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
This course doesn´t have a final exam.
Student workload
Contact lessons 29 h
Independent studying and Learning assignments 90 h
Thesis subject 16 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
2.5 op
Mode of delivery
50 % Face-to-face, 50 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 60
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Petri Vauhkonen
Groups
-
TLS21S1Logistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Autumn semester 2024.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This course is for logistics engineering full-time students, group code TLS21S1.
The course includes face to face lessons, self-studying and learning assignments.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
No final exam.
Alternative completion methods
The admission procedures are described in the degree rule and the study guide. The teacher of the course will give you more information on possible specific course practices.
Student workload
One credit corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work, which means that the load of five credits is approximately 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
20.08.2024 - 18.12.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 25
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Henri Kervola
Groups
-
TLS23KMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS23SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS24KMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS21KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS24SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
The course is intended for logistics distance learning students. The course should be completed in the semester preceding the semester in which you intend to complete your thesis. The course includes online lectures and assignments. The first assignment of the course must be completed within three weeks of the first few days of the course. Those who fail to complete the assignment will be removed from the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Student workload
Yksi opintopiste tarkoittaa laskennallisesti keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä eli viiden opintopisteen opintojakson kuormitus on noin 135 h.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 25.10.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Tuija Ketola
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Minna Haapakoski
Groups
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT22SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SOS22SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR23K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR23KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SKO22SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Webinars on Zoom:
Wed 4.9.2024 at 12-15 /Start of the course
Wed 11.9.2024 at 12-15 /Good Scientific Practice
Wed 18.9.2024 at 12-15 /Quantitative research
Wed 25.9.2024 at 12-15 /Quantitative research
Wed 2.10.2024 at 12-15 /Literature review
Wed 9.10.2024 at 12-15 /Research development activities
Exams (online exam in Moodle):
Wed 23.10.2024 at 12-13
Fri 25.10.2024 9-10 am /1st repetition
Wed 30.10.2024 at 12-13 /2.repetition
Teaching methods
You will participate in scheduled webinars that include small group work. You will carry out pre- and in-class assignments independently, familiarise yourself with course materials and methodological literature, and search for information related to research and development activities.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Tentit (verkkotentti Moodlessa):
ke 23.10.2024 klo 12-13
pe 25.10.2024 klo 9-10 /1.uusinta
ke 30.10.2024 klo 12-13 /2.uusinta
Student workload
5 x 27 h = 135
-Aihe-ehdotusharjoitus
-Ennakkotehtävä- ja oppimistehtävä hyvään tieteelliseen käytäntöön sekä tutkimusetiikkaan liittyen
-Ennakko- ja oppimistehtävät eri tutkimusmenetelmiin (4) liittyen sekä webinaarit
-Tenttikirjallisuuden ja luentodiojen lukeminen sekä tentti.
Further information for students
Oppimistehtävät arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty-hylätty.
Opintojakson arvosana perustuu tenttisuoritukseen (100 %).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2024 - 22.08.2024
Timing
26.08.2024 - 25.10.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
TA51 - Kuntoutusinstituutti
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Minna Haapakoski
Groups
-
STT22SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR22S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22SM2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SOS22SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR22S2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SKO22SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
1. Aloitus ja Jamkin opinnäytetyöprosessi: ti 3.9. klo 12-15.
2. Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja tutkimusetiikka: ti 10.9. klo 12-15
3. Määrällinen tutkimus: ti 17.9. klo 12-15
4. Laadullinen tutkimus: ti 24.9. klo 12-15
5. Kirjallisuuskatsaus: ti 1.10. klo 12-15
6. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta: ti 8.10. klo 12-15
Tentti: ti 22.10. klo 12-13
Tentti I: pe 25.10. klo 12-13
Tentti II: ti 29.10. klo 12-13
Teaching methods
Aktiivinen osallistuminen Zoom-webinaareihin, jotka sisältävät pienryhmätyöskentelyä.
Itsenäinen työskentely, joka sisältää ennakkotehtävien tekemistä, materiaaleihin sekä menetelmäkirjallisuuteen perehtymistä ja näihin liittyvää tiedonhankintaa.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti Moodlessa: ti 22.10. klo 12-13
Verkkotentti Moodlessa, ensimmäinen uusinta: pe 25.10. klo 12-13
Verkkotentti Moodlessa, toinen uusinta: ti 29.10. klo 12-13
Student workload
5 x 27 h = 135
-Aihe-ehdotusharjoitus
-Ennakkotehtävä- ja oppimistehtävä hyvään tieteelliseen käytäntöön sekä tutkimusetiikkaan liittyen
-Ennakko- ja oppimistehtävät eri tutkimusmenetelmiin (4) liittyen.
-Tenttikirjallisuuden ja luentodiojen lukeminen sekä tentti.
Further information for students
Oppimistehtävät arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty-hylätty.
Opintojakson arvosana perustuu tenttisuoritukseen (100 %).
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Timing
21.05.2024 - 31.07.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Tuija Ketola
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Minna Haapakoski
Groups
-
SFT21S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
SOS21SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT21S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
SAR22S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22S2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT21SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SKO21SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Teaching methods
Virtuaaliopetus
Itsenäinen työskentely
Ryhmätyöskentely
Exam dates and retake possibilities
11.6.
13.8.
20.8.
Further information for students
Oppimistehtävät arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty-hylätty, arvosana perustuu tenttisuoritukseen (100 %)
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.04.2024 - 30.04.2024
Timing
21.05.2024 - 31.07.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Tuija Ketola
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Tuija Ketola
Groups
-
SFT21S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
SOS21SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT21S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
SAR22S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22S2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT21SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SKO21SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
21.05.24 klo 08.30 - 11.30 Webinaari: Opintojakson aloitus
24.05.24 klo 08.30 - 11.30 Webinaari: Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö
28.05.24 klo 12.30 - 15.30 Webinaari: Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta
31.05.24 klo 8.30 - 11.30 Webinaari: Laadullinen tutkimus
04.06.24 klo 08.30 - 11.30 Webinaari: Kirjallisuuskatsaus
07.06.24 klo 12.00-15.00 Webinaari: Määrällinen tutkimus
Teaching methods
Osallistut aikataulutettuihin webinaareihin, jotka sisältävät pienryhmätyöskentelyä. Teet ennakko- ja oppimistehtäviä itsenäisesti, perehdyt opintojakson materiaaleihin ja menetelmäkirjallisuuteen sekä etsit tutkimus- ja kehittäimisttoimintaan liittyvää tietoa.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Tentit
11.06.24 klo 9 - 10
13 .08.24 klo 9 - 10 / 1. uusinta
20.08.24 klo 9 - 10 / 2. uusinta
Further information for students
Oppimistehtävät arvioidaan asteikolla hyväksytty-hylätty, arvosana perustuu tenttisuoritukseen (100 %)
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
11.03.2024 - 20.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Teachers
- Marjo Palovaara
- Suleiman Kamau
Teacher in charge
Marjo Palovaara
Groups
-
SNS22SG2Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
-
SNS24VKBachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing, vaihto-opiskelu/Exchange studies
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti tehdään opintojaksolla ilmoitettuna valvottuna ajankohtana.
Hylätyn verkkotentin voi suorittaa uusintakerroilla (2 kpl)
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
11.03.2024 - 20.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Teachers
- Minna Haapakoski
- Kristiina Juntunen
- Pauliina Soanvaara
Teacher in charge
Kristiina Juntunen
Groups
-
SFT21S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
SOS21SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT21S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
SAR22S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22S2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT21SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SKO21SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.02.2024 - 11.02.2024
Timing
12.02.2024 - 20.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
80 % Face-to-face, 20 % Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 40
Teachers
- Piotr Krawczyk
Groups
-
HBI24VKKBachelor’s degree in Business Administration, Kedge Business School
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Learning materials and recommended literature
Textbook:
Research methods for Business Students; Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, Adrian Thornhill, additional virtual material available
Please Note ! Research methods for business students, 4th ed. 2006 / Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, Adrian Thornhill is now freely available to you via JAMK on-campus and Intranet Library
JAMK's thesis-related directions in the Study Guide
School-specific directions on the dedicated learning platform and
Elmo Student
Online study materials on Information retrieval
Stevens, J., & Crawford, S. 2014. Project reporting instructions. Adapted from Raportointiohje [Reporting instructions] by Liukko, S., & Perttula, S. 2013. JAMK University of Applied Sciences’ open learning materials. Accessed on 12 March 2014. Retrieved from http - //oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/project reporting instructions
Other relevant materials.
Teaching methods
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Lectures, course project/group assignments, thesis proposal/individual assignment, exam test.
Practical training and working life connections
Thesis as part of double degree diploma and/or overseas internship.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Exam is held online.
There is 1 retake possibility. Specific time and date are announced after the grading of the first attempt and are available in the course workspace.
International connections
The course is available for Double Degree students and Study Abroad students from JAMK's partner institutions around the world.
Alternative completion methods
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Student workload
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Total 125-155 hours split among virtual study, assignments, and independent study.
Content scheduling
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Weekly lectures, workshops, and assignments.
Fall semester the course ends at the latest in the third week of December.
Spring semester the course ends at the latest at the end of May.
More details to be announced during the course.
Further information for students
Open UAS: 4 (included in the total capacity)
The assessment method for this course is designed with specific criteria crafted for each assignment/project and the overarching learning objectives. Peer evaluation is integrated into the learning process through interactive workshops. Detail and specific information regarding assessment can be accessed within the dedicated course workspace.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
01.02.2024 - 30.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
20 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Teachers
- Mari Partanen
- Rositsa Röntynen
- Minna Tunkkari-Eskelinen
Groups
-
MTM21S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
-
MTM20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
-
MTM19S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material collected by the teacher can be found at Moodle. Any material e.g. research method books can be used as additional material.
Teaching methods
Lectures in the classroom
Individual learning
Assignments
Practical training and working life connections
-
Exam dates and retake possibilities
-
International connections
-
Alternative completion methods
-
Student workload
One credit corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work, which means that the load of five credits is approximately 135 hours.
Contact lessons: 35h
Individual work and excercises: 100h
Content scheduling
The 1st part: Quantitative research
The 2nd part: Qualitative research
Further information for students
Assessment criteria of the course is applied to the both individual assignments.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
18.01.2024 - 30.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Teachers
- Tiina Blek
Groups
-
SOK23K1Kätilö (AMK), päivätoteutus
-
SAR23K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Teaching methods
Webinars, held every two weeks. In between the webinars, you will have either individual or small group assignments. You will come to the webinars prepared, i.e. you will always receive material before the webinar which you should already have studied in advance. Webinars always include a theoretical part and additional participatory tasks (tests, discussions, exercises). The theoretical parts of the webinars will be recorded.
Practical training and working life connections
-
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Tentti 11.4. klo 12.30 - 15 välisenä aikana
Uusintatentti 1 18.4. klo 15-17.15 välisenä aikana
Uusintatentti 2 25.4. klo 15-17.15 välisenä aikana
Alternative completion methods
Voit opinnollistaa opintojakson tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus on 5 opintopistettä, eli keskimäärin 135 tuntia opiskelijan työtä.
Ajankäyttö jakaantuu (keskimäärin) seuraavasti:
Webinaarit, niihin valmistautuminen ja oppimistehtävät 3 op (81 tuntia)
Alustavan aihe-ehdotuksen laatiminen 1 op (27 tuntia)
Tentti ja siihen valmistautuminen 1 op (27 tuntia)
Further information for students
Opintojakson arvosana määräytyy tenttiarvosanan perusteella. Sinulla on tutkintosäännön mukaisesti mahdollisuus uusia hyväksytty tentti yhden kerran. Ilmoita opettajalle, jos haluat käyttää tätä mahdollisuutta hyväksesi.
Opintojakson suoritukseen vaaditaan, että kaikki oppimistehtävät on palautettu ja ne on hyväksytty.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 14.01.2024
Timing
16.01.2024 - 30.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 100
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Technology
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Marjukka Nuutinen
- Harri Peuranen
Groups
-
TKN21SAKonetekniikka (AMK)
-
TKN21SBKonetekniikka (AMK)
-
TKN21SMKonetekniikka
-
TER21S1Energia- ja ympäristötekniikka (AMK)
-
TER21SMEnergia- ja ympäristötekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Kananen, J. 2015. Online Research for Preparing your Thesis. Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 198.
Kananen, J. 2011. Rafting Through the Thesis Process: Step by Step Guide to thesis Process. . Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 114.Field-specific methodological literature.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Teaching methods
NOTE: The first and only introductory webinar is mandatory. If a student does not participate in it, they will be removed from the course. In case of a justified reason for absence, the responsible teacher must be notified in advance before the aforementioned webinar. A substitute task, which is accepted and entitles participation in the course, will be assigned to replace attendance.
Zoom-guidance times on a monthly basis based on individual needs.
Information retrieval and applied learning tasks. Through problem-based learning, students have tasks to solve. Some learning tasks are done in groups and some individually
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- online contact sessions 5 learning work hours
- learning tasks 85 learning work hours
- studying the course material ans literature 45 learning work hours.
Total 135 learning work hours.
Content scheduling
- Introduction: Wednesday, 17th January 2024, from 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM
- Q&A and guidance: Wednesday, 7th February 2024, from 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM
- Q&A and guidance: Wednesday, 6th March 2024, from 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM
- Q&A and guidance: Wednesday, 3rd April 2024, from 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM
Participation in the introductory session serves as confirmation of your participation in the course.
During the introductory session, the first assignments will be given. The course ends on 30th April 2024.
Further information for students
Evaluation methods:
Reflective self-evaluation, peer commentary, continuous feedback and overall evaluation of the course based on the learning tasks.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
16.01.2024 - 30.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Service Business
Teachers
- Tarja Niemelä
Groups
-
MPT22SMPalveluliiketoiminnan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
15.01.2024 - 26.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV21S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV21S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV21S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA22KMInsinööri (AMK), sähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka,monimuototeutus
-
TTV21S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Moodlen verkkotyötilassa oleva materiaali.
Kirjallisuutta:
Aaltio, I., Juuti, P. & Puusa, A. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Bister, T. 2019. Tietojenkäsittelyn opinnäytetyö: Viittoja ja karttoja tutkimisen ja kehittämisen teille. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 272. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2015. Tutki ja kirjoita. 20. painos. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2015. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittajan opas. Näin kirjoitan opinnäytetyön tai pro gradun alusta loppuun. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 202. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kananen, J. 2015. Verkkotutkimus opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 187. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. (Kirja sisältää laadullisen ja määrällisen tutkimuksen).
Kananen, J. 2019. Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas. Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 262. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Opinnäytetyön raportointi. Oppimateriaali. Uusin versio. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. https://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/.
Puusa, A., Juuti, P., Aaltio, I., Siltaoja, M., Puusa, A. & Sorsa, V. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Valli, R. & Aarnos, E. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 1, Metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu : virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Vilkka, H. 2021. Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä: Ratkaisut tutkimuksen umpikujiin. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Teaching methods
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: Zoom-verkkoluennot ja -webinaarit, itseopiskelu, pienryhmätyöskentely, harjoitustyöt ja oppimistehtävät. Zoom-linkki https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Opintojaksoon ei kuulu tenttiä. Opintojaksoon kuuluvat oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt aikatauluineen esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla ke 17.1.2024 klo 9.30-11.
Alternative completion methods
Hyväksilukemisen menettelytavat kuvataan tutkintosäännössä ja opinto-oppaassa. Opintojakson opettaja antaa lisätietoa mahdollisista opintojakson erityiskäytänteistä.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus 5 op = 135 opiskelijan työtuntia (1 op tarkoittaa keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä)
- verkkoluennot ja webinaarit n. 20 tuntia
- opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen (itseopiskelu) n. 40 tuntia
- oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt n. 75 tuntia
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinaarit keskiviikkoisin klo 9.30-11, aloitus 17.1.2024
Further information for students
Opintojakso arvioidaan skaalalla 0-5. Arviointiperusteet esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
15.01.2024 - 26.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV21S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV21S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV21S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA22KMInsinööri (AMK), sähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka,monimuototeutus
-
TTV21S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Moodlen verkkotyötilassa oleva materiaali.
Kirjallisuutta:
Aaltio, I., Juuti, P. & Puusa, A. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Bister, T. 2019. Tietojenkäsittelyn opinnäytetyö: Viittoja ja karttoja tutkimisen ja kehittämisen teille. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 272. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2015. Tutki ja kirjoita. 20. painos. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2015. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittajan opas. Näin kirjoitan opinnäytetyön tai pro gradun alusta loppuun. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 202. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kananen, J. 2015. Verkkotutkimus opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 187. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. (Kirja sisältää laadullisen ja määrällisen tutkimuksen).
Kananen, J. 2019. Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas. Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 262. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Opinnäytetyön raportointi. Oppimateriaali. Uusin versio. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. https://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/.
Puusa, A., Juuti, P., Aaltio, I., Siltaoja, M., Puusa, A. & Sorsa, V. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Valli, R. & Aarnos, E. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 1, Metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu : virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Vilkka, H. 2021. Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä: Ratkaisut tutkimuksen umpikujiin. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Teaching methods
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: Zoom-verkkoluennot ja -webinaarit, itseopiskelu, pienryhmätyöskentely, harjoitustyöt ja oppimistehtävät. Zoom-linkki https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Opintojaksoon ei kuulu tenttiä. Opintojaksoon kuuluvat oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt aikatauluineen esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla ke 17.1.2024 klo 12-13.30.
Alternative completion methods
Hyväksilukemisen menettelytavat kuvataan tutkintosäännössä ja opinto-oppaassa. Opintojakson opettaja antaa lisätietoa mahdollisista opintojakson erityiskäytänteistä.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus 5 op = 135 opiskelijan työtuntia (1 op tarkoittaa keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä)
- verkkoluennot ja webinaarit n. 20 tuntia
- opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen (itseopiskelu) n. 40 tuntia
- oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt n. 75 tuntia
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinaarit keskiviikkoisin klo 12-13.30, aloitus 17.1.2024
Further information for students
Opintojakso arvioidaan skaalalla 0-5. Arviointiperusteet esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
15.01.2024 - 26.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV21S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV21S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV21S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA22KMInsinööri (AMK), sähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka,monimuototeutus
-
TTV21S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Moodlen verkkotyötilassa oleva materiaali.
Kirjallisuutta:
Aaltio, I., Juuti, P. & Puusa, A. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Bister, T. 2019. Tietojenkäsittelyn opinnäytetyö: Viittoja ja karttoja tutkimisen ja kehittämisen teille. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 272. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2015. Tutki ja kirjoita. 20. painos. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2015. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittajan opas. Näin kirjoitan opinnäytetyön tai pro gradun alusta loppuun. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 202. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kananen, J. 2015. Verkkotutkimus opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 187. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. (Kirja sisältää laadullisen ja määrällisen tutkimuksen).
Kananen, J. 2019. Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas. Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 262. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Opinnäytetyön raportointi. Oppimateriaali. Uusin versio. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. https://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/.
Puusa, A., Juuti, P., Aaltio, I., Siltaoja, M., Puusa, A. & Sorsa, V. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Valli, R. & Aarnos, E. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 1, Metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu : virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Vilkka, H. 2021. Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä: Ratkaisut tutkimuksen umpikujiin. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Teaching methods
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: Zoom-verkkoluennot ja -webinaarit, itseopiskelu, pienryhmätyöskentely, harjoitustyöt ja oppimistehtävät. Zoom-linkki https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Opintojaksoon ei kuulu tenttiä. Opintojaksoon kuuluvat oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt aikatauluineen esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla ke 17.1.2024 klo 14.15-15.45.
Alternative completion methods
Hyväksilukemisen menettelytavat kuvataan tutkintosäännössä ja opinto-oppaassa. Opintojakson opettaja antaa lisätietoa mahdollisista opintojakson erityiskäytänteistä.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus 5 op = 135 opiskelijan työtuntia (1 op tarkoittaa keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä)
- verkkoluennot ja webinaarit n. 20 tuntia
- opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen (itseopiskelu) n. 40 tuntia
- oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt n. 75 tuntia
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinaarit keskiviikkoisin klo 14.15-15.45, aloitus 17.1.2024.
Further information for students
Opintojakso arvioidaan skaalalla 0-5. Arviointiperusteet esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 20.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Teija Koskinen
Groups
-
HTL21S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL22S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 20.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Heidi Neuvonen
Groups
-
HTL21S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL22S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL21SIYLiiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL22SIYLiiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
OR
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
OR
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
AND
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
OR
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
OR
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
The course can also be studied by the multi-mode students.
The course is held online and it has eight themes.
Each theme has independent assignments.
Guidance:
Mandatory introduction meetings (online)
Guidance in online-learning space (Moodle).
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam must be done during the course.
Failed exam can be re-done two times during the course.
Alternative completion methods
This course can be replaced by relevant prior studies or knowledge. See the Jamk degree regulations for more information.
Student workload
Webinars 14h
Indendent studies and assignments 101h
Exam preparation and exam 20h
Total 135h
Content scheduling
The course has eigth themes. Each theme has 2-4 weeks time frame.
Each theme includes self studies (reading, videos) and assignments.
Further information for students
This course replaces the prior course ZZPP0610 Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminta.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 20.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Information Technology
Teachers
- Ilari Miikkulainen
Groups
-
HTG21S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Information Technology
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
The primary mode of delivery is a in-class lectures and activities on campus.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Learning materials and recommended literature
The materials will be announced on the first lecture. As a starting point, however:
JAMK's thesis-related directions in the Study Guide
School-specific directions on the dedicated learning platform and
Elmo Student
Online study materials on Information retrieval
Stevens, J., & Crawford, S. 2014. Project reporting instructions. Adapted from Raportointiohje [Reporting instructions] by Liukko, S., & Perttula, S. 2013. JAMK University of Applied Sciences’ open learning materials. Accessed on 12 March 2014. Retrieved from http - //oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/project reporting instructions
Teaching methods
The primary mode of delivery is an in-class activities on campus.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Lectures, course project/group assignments, thesis proposal/individual assignment, exam test.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Alternative completion methods
No alternative ways to complete.
Student workload
Total 125-155 hours
Content scheduling
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Weekly lectures, workshops, and assignments.
More details to be announced during the course.
Further information for students
Open UAS: 4 (included in the total capacity)
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 20.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Information Technology
Teachers
- Jarkko Immonen
Groups
-
HTK21S1Tietojenkäsittely (AMK)
-
HTK20S1Tietojenkäsittely
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures or Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done individually.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 19.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Henri Kervola
Groups
-
TLS23KMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS20KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
TLS23SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS21KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Toteutus on tarkoitettu logistiikan monimuoto-opiskelijiolle. Opintojakso tulee suorittaa edeltävänä lukukautena kuin, milloin aikoo tehdä opinnäytetyön. Toteutus sisältää verkkoluentoja ja tehtäviä.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Student workload
Yksi opintopiste tarkoittaa laskennallisesti keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä eli viiden opintopisteen opintojakson kuormitus on noin 135 h.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 05.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 19.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Leena Rasa
Groups
-
SAR24KM2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 03.03.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Minna Haapakoski
- Kristiina Juntunen
Teacher in charge
Minna Haapakoski
Groups
-
SFT21S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
SOS21SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT21S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
SAR22S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22S2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT21SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SKO21SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 09.03.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Minna Haapakoski
- Kristiina Juntunen
- Katri Ylönen
Teacher in charge
Minna Haapakoski
Groups
-
SFT21S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
SOS21SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT21S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
SAR22S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT21SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SKO21SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
08.01.2024 - 30.04.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Petri Vauhkonen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Spring semester 2024.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This course is for logistics engineering full-time students.
The course includes face to face lessons, self-studying and learning assignments.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
No final exam.
Alternative completion methods
The admission procedures are described in the degree rule and the study guide. The teacher of the course will give you more information on possible specific course practices.
Student workload
One credit corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work, which means that the load of five credits is approximately 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
01.01.2024 - 19.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Service Business
Teachers
- Sari-Maarit Peltola
Groups
-
MPT22S1Palveluliiketoiminnan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks and tests 70 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- thesis subject 15 h
- thesis seminars 6 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
01.01.2024 - 19.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
2.5 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
50 % Face-to-face, 50 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Institute of Bioeconomy
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Teachers
- Laura Vertainen
Groups
-
LMS21S1Maaseutuelinkeinot (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 40 h
- learning tasks 65 h
- studying the course material 30 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
20.11.2023 - 04.01.2024
Timing
01.01.2024 - 19.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Institute of Bioeconomy
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Teachers
- Laura Vertainen
Groups
-
LMS21KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Agricultural and Rural Industries
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 40 h
- learning tasks 65 h
- studying the course material 30 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Timing
28.08.2023 - 20.05.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Team Academy
Teachers
- Anu Manner
- Tero Lehtinen
- Kimmo Aho
- Tapu Holttinen
- Janne Roiha
- Jaana Larsson
Groups
-
HTA21S1Tiimiakatemia (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
No regular meetings.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
TAI
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
TAI
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
JA
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
TAI
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
TAI
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
The course consists of eight themes.
Each of the themes includes individual and small group assignments.
Manner of performance: independent and small group assignments and an exam.
Manner of guidance:
Compulsory starting for all
Learning activities and guidance by coaches
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam needs to be done during the course. Failed exam can be re-sit twice.
Alternative completion methods
Crediting of the previous studies or competence is possible regarding to JAMK practicalities.
Student workload
Starting session 1 h
Independent study and assignments 124 h
Getting set for the exam and the exam 10 h
Total 135 h
Content scheduling
The course has eight themes. The duration of each themes is approximately a week. Each theme includes learning material and activities.
Further information for students
Course replaces former course ZZPP0610.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 25.10.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Music Pedagogue
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Construction and Civil Engineering
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Service Business
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Technology
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Electrical and Automation Engineering
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Team Academy
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Information Technology
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Agricultural and Rural Industries
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Olli Väänänen
Groups
-
TSA20SABachelor's Degree Programme in Electrical and Automation Engineering
-
TSA20SBBachelor's Degree Programme in Electrical and Automation Engineering
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Kananen, J. 2015. Online Research for Preparing your Thesis. Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 198.Kananen, J. 2011. Rafting Through the Thesis Process: Step by Step Guide to thesis Process. . Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 114.Field-specific methodological literature.
Teaching methods
Lectures, information retrieval and applied learning assigments. Assignments in groups are based on Problem-based learning. In distance learning the assignments are done individually.
Student workload
Distance lectures max. 28 h, exercises and independent studies 107 h total 135 h
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
80 % Face-to-face, 20 % Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in International Business
Teachers
- Piotr Krawczyk
Groups
-
ZJAHBI23S1Avoin AMK, IB, AMK-polut, International Business
-
HBI23S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in International Business
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance. However, if the COVID-19 situation requires the learning will be supported by online tutorials.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Learning materials and recommended literature
Textbook:
Research methods for Business Students; Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, Adrian Thornhill, additional virtual material available
Please Note ! Research methods for business students, 4th ed. 2006 / Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, Adrian Thornhill is now freely available to you via JAMK on-campus and Intranet Library
JAMK's thesis-related directions in the Study Guide
School-specific directions on the dedicated learning platform and
Elmo Student
Online study materials on Information retrieval
Stevens, J., & Crawford, S. 2014. Project reporting instructions. Adapted from Raportointiohje [Reporting instructions] by Liukko, S., & Perttula, S. 2013. JAMK University of Applied Sciences’ open learning materials. Accessed on 12 March 2014. Retrieved from http - //oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/project reporting instructions
Other relevant materials.
Teaching methods
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance. However, if the COVID-19 situation requires the learning will be supported by online tutorials.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Lectures, course project/group assignments, thesis proposal/individual assignment, exam test.
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Practical training and working life connections
Thesis as part of double degree diploma and/or overseas internship.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
International connections
The course is available for Double Degree students and Study Abroad students from JAMK's partner institutions around the world.
Alternative completion methods
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance. However, if the COVID-19 situation requires the learning will be supported by online tutorials.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Student workload
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Total 125-155 hours
Content scheduling
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Weekly lectures, workshops, and assignments.
Fall semester the course ends at the latest in the third week of December.
Spring semester the course ends at the latest at the end of May.
More details to be announced during the course.
Further information for students
Open UAS: 4 (included in the total capacity)
The student understands what a research process includes, how to formulate a research topic and research questions, do a literature review, understand research philosophies and approaches, formulate research design, is aware of research ethics and challenges in getting access to data/organizations as well as available sampling techniques. The student is aware of the different data sources, research methods, and strategies to choose from, as well as data collection techniques and procedures and analysis, and can draw basic conclusions. The student is familiar with JAMK thesis/diploma guidelines.
JAMK and IB specific Competences:
1. Learning to learn-
You develop critical and analytical mindset that helps you to study and review existing knowledge in the light of relevant learning resources and learning methods; incentivizes you to acquire new knowledge; and develops your intellectual capabilities to seek conclusions and draw inferences in various contexts.
To achieve this competence, you will:
– learn to formulate relevant questions and seek information,
-review relevant theoretical, and empirical literature to comprehend diverse perspectives and evaluate, and interpret arguments and counter-arguments,
-understand new developments in your field of study and make informed decisions based thereon.
- acquire the researcher’s mindset to problematize, explore and understand real-life phenomena especially in the academic track system.
2. Proactive development-
You develop solutions in the light of current as well as anticipated situations and challenges in business by applying knowledge, critical reasoning and analytical skills. You ensure that these solutions are feasible, relevant, creative, user-friendly, and sustainable as well as underline active cooperation amongst different actors.
To achieve this competence, you will:
- apply existing knowledge and utilize relevant research methods including digital technology in development projects,
-interpret new evidence in the light of existing body of knowledge, make comparisons and draw inferences,
- express your intellectual contribution through scientific or professional writings,
-understand utility, creativity, viability, scalability, and sustainability of new solutions.
3. Internationality and multiculturalism-
You work in multicultural and international environments and networks in order to develop knowledge and communication skills as well as develop empathy and appreciation for other cultures. You communicate responsibly and effectively in English through written, verbal, non-verbal and digital formats individually as well as a team member in diverse settings.
To achieve this competence, you will:
-be familiar with the impact of your cultural background on your actions and be able to effectively and productively function in your work community that explicitly recognizes the relevance of multiculturalism,
-demonstrate meaningful intercultural teamwork, including the roles of leadership and conflict resolution, in order to develop creative solutions carrying multicultural underpinnings,
-be able to experience group learning and share best practices in international settings,
- learn to communicate ideas and solutions effectively in the context of various subjects, multiple purposes, and a wide range of audience both individually as well as in a group,
- initiate and engage constructive dialogues among relevant stakeholders to accomplish desired goals for multiple purposes and communicate ideas and solutions to a wide range of audience including both individuals and groups,
-learn to be ‘active listener’ to understand diverse perspectives, and points of view in accurate, unbiased, and critical manner,
-learn various aspects of digital media.
4. Ethics-
You benchmark and demonstrate ethical and responsible conduct according to the well-established principles, norms and best practices laid down by relevant national and international bodies and organisations.
To achieve this competence, you will:
-understand and apply the well-established principles of responsible conduct in research, and problem solving,
-adhere to the principles of equity, equality, and non-discrimination,
-take responsibility for your own actions and their consequences and reflect on them in accordance with the relevant ethical principles, norms, and practices,
- develop realization of diversity and accessibility in your actions.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 20.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Teachers
- Marjo Palovaara
- Suleiman Kamau
Teacher in charge
Marjo Palovaara
Groups
-
SNS22SG1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
-
SNS23VSBachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing, vaihto-opiskelu/Exchange studies
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti tehdään opintojaksolla ilmoitettuna valvottuna ajankohtana.
Hylätyn verkkotentin voi suorittaa uusintakerroilla (2 kpl)
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 10
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Hannu Kivistö
- Olli Väänänen
- Janne Lappi
Groups
-
TKN20SBKonetekniikka (AMK)
-
TKN20SAKonetekniikka (AMK)
-
TKN20SMKonetekniikka
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Aila Pikkarainen
Teacher in charge
Kristiina Juntunen
Groups
-
SFT21S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR21S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SOS21SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT21S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
SAR21SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT21SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SKO21SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Merja Kurunsaari
Teacher in charge
Kristina Grahn
Groups
-
SFT21S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR21S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SOS21SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT21S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR22KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT21SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SKO21SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Riikka Ahlgren
Groups
-
HTL21S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL22S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
TAI
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
TAI
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
JA
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
OR
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
OR
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
Contact lessons.
Independent tasks and exam.
Practical training and working life connections
This course has a research project, which can be done for a case organisation.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam must be done during the course.
Alternative completion methods
This course uses Jamk practices on the recognition of the prior learning.
Student workload
Contact lessons 20h
Independent studies 105h
Exam and preparations 10h
Total 135h
Content scheduling
This course has eight themes.
Further information for students
Teacher's assessments
Self assessments
Peer assessments
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 60
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Riikka Ahlgren
Groups
-
HTL21S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL22S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL21SIYLiiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL22SIYLiiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Online workshops every second week.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
OR
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
OR
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
AND
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
OR
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
OR
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
This course is held for daytime students. The course can also be studied by the multi-mode students.
The course is held online and it has eight themes.
Each theme has independent assignments.
Guidance:
Online workshops every second week.
Guidance in online-learning space (Moodle).
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam must be done during the course.
Failed exam can be re-done two times during the course.
Alternative completion methods
This course can be replaced by relevant prior studies or knowledge. See the Jamk intra and degree regulations for more information.
Student workload
Online lessons 16h
Indendent studies and assignments 98h
Exam preparation and exam 20h
Total 135h
Content scheduling
The course has eigth themes. Each theme has 2-4 weeks time frame.
Each theme includes self studies (reading, videos), assignments and an online workshop.
Further information for students
This course replaces the prior course ZZPP0610 Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminta.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 26.01.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Finnish Music Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Music Pedagogue
Teachers
- Eeva Oksala
Groups
-
KPD21S1Musiikkipedagogi (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Syyskuu 2023 Ennakkotehtävä, itsenäistä työskentelyä (Moodle)
6.10.2023-31.1.2024 Verkkoluennot perjantaisin 8.45-11.45 Zoomissa
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 27.10.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
20 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Teachers
- Susanna Nuijanmaa
- Mari Partanen
- Sari-Maarit Peltola
- Minna Tunkkari-Eskelinen
Groups
-
MTM21S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV21S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV21S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV21S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
-
TTV21S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Moodlen verkkotyötilassa oleva materiaali.
Kirjallisuutta:
Aaltio, I., Juuti, P. & Puusa, A. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Bister, T. 2019. Tietojenkäsittelyn opinnäytetyö: Viittoja ja karttoja tutkimisen ja kehittämisen teille. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 272. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2015. Tutki ja kirjoita. 20. painos. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2015. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittajan opas. Näin kirjoitan opinnäytetyön tai pro gradun alusta loppuun. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 202. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kananen, J. 2015. Verkkotutkimus opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 187. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. (Kirja sisältää laadullisen ja määrällisen tutkimuksen).
Kananen, J. 2019. Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas. Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 262. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Opinnäytetyön raportointi. Oppimateriaali. Uusin versio. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. https://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/.
Puusa, A., Juuti, P., Aaltio, I., Siltaoja, M., Puusa, A. & Sorsa, V. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Valli, R. & Aarnos, E. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 1, Metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu : virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Vilkka, H. 2021. Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä: Ratkaisut tutkimuksen umpikujiin. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Teaching methods
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: Zoom-verkkoluennot ja -webinaarit, itseopiskelu, pienryhmätyöskentely, harjoitustyöt ja oppimistehtävät. Zoom-linkki https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinaareissa läsnäolo on lähtökohta, poissaolo poikkeus.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Opintojaksoon ei kuulu tenttiä. Opintojaksoon kuuluvat oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt aikatauluineen esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla ke 30.8.2023 klo 11.30-13 Zoomissa.
Alternative completion methods
Hyväksilukemisen menettelytavat kuvataan tutkintosäännössä ja opinto-oppaassa. Opintojakson opettaja antaa lisätietoa mahdollisista opintojakson erityiskäytänteistä.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus 5 op = 135 opiskelijan työtuntia (1 op tarkoittaa keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä)
- verkkoluennot ja webinaarit n. 20 tuntia
- opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen (itseopiskelu) n. 40 tuntia
- oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt n. 75 tuntia
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Luennot keskiviikkoisin klo 11.30-13, aloitus ke 30.8.2023.
Webinaareissa läsnäolo on lähtökohta, poissaolo poikkeus.
Further information for students
Opintojakso arvioidaan skaalalla 0-5. Arviointiperusteet esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla 30.8.2023.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV21SMTieto- ja viestintätekniikka (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Moodlen verkkotyötilassa oleva materiaali.
Kirjallisuutta:
Aaltio, I., Juuti, P. & Puusa, A. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Bister, T. 2019. Tietojenkäsittelyn opinnäytetyö: Viittoja ja karttoja tutkimisen ja kehittämisen teille. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 272. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2015. Tutki ja kirjoita. 20. painos. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2015. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittajan opas. Näin kirjoitan opinnäytetyön tai pro gradun alusta loppuun. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 202. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kananen, J. 2015. Verkkotutkimus opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 187. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. (Kirja sisältää laadullisen ja määrällisen tutkimuksen).
Kananen, J. 2019. Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas. Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 262. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Opinnäytetyön raportointi. Oppimateriaali. Uusin versio. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. https://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/.
Puusa, A., Juuti, P., Aaltio, I., Siltaoja, M., Puusa, A. & Sorsa, V. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Valli, R. & Aarnos, E. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 1, Metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu : virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Vilkka, H. 2021. Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä: Ratkaisut tutkimuksen umpikujiin. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Teaching methods
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: Zoom-verkkoluennot ja -webinaarit, itseopiskelu, pienryhmätyöskentely, harjoitustyöt ja oppimistehtävät. Zoom-linkki https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Webinaareissa läsnäolo on lähtökohta, poissaolo poikkeus.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Opintojaksoon ei kuulu tenttiä. Opintojaksoon kuuluvat oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt aikatauluineen esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla pe 1.9.2023 klo 15.30 - 18.30.
Alternative completion methods
Hyväksilukemisen menettelytavat kuvataan tutkintosäännössä ja opinto-oppaassa. Opintojakson opettaja antaa lisätietoa mahdollisista opintojakson erityiskäytänteistä.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus 5 op = 135 opiskelijan työtuntia (1 op tarkoittaa keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä)
- verkkoluennot ja webinaarit n. 20 tuntia
- opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen (itseopiskelu) n. 40 tuntia
- oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt n. 75 tuntia
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123.
Aloituswebinaari pe 1.9. 2023 klo 15.30-18.30.
Syksyn muut kokoontumiskerrat (varmistetaan aloituskerralla):
pe 15.9. klo 12-18.30
pe 6.10. klo 15.30-18.30
pe 27.10. klo 15.30-18.30
pe 10.11. klo 15.30-18.30
Webinaareissa läsnäolo on lähtökohta, poissaolo poikkeus.
Further information for students
Opintojakso arvioidaan skaalalla 0-5. Arviointiperusteet esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Teachers
- Petri Vauhkonen
Groups
-
TLS20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Autumn semester 2023.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This course is for full time logistics students.
Course includes face to face lessons, self-studying and learning assignments.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
No final exam.
Alternative completion methods
The admission procedures are described in the degree rule and the study guide. The teacher of the course will give you more information on possible specific course practices.
Student workload
One credit corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work, which means that the load of five credits is approximately 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 18
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Purchasing and Logistics Engineering
Teachers
- Marjo Turunen
Groups
-
TLP20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Purchasing and Logistics Engineering
-
TLE23SHYITBachelor's Degree Programme in International Logistics, HYIT
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This course is for Purchasing and Logistics Engineering / International Logistics students only.
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons, self-studying, group works and assignments.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
This course doesn´t have an exam.
Student workload
Contact lessons 9 h
Independent studying 40 h
Learning assignments 60
Thesis subject 26 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 29.10.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Katri Ylönen
Teacher in charge
Kristiina Juntunen
Groups
-
SFT21S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR21S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SOS21SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT21S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR22K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT21SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SKO21SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 16.11.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Katri Ylönen
- Aila Pikkarainen
- Merja Kurunsaari
Teacher in charge
Kristiina Juntunen
Groups
-
SFT21S1Fysioterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR21S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SOS21SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SFT22SMFysioterapeutin tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
STT21S1Toimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SAR22K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT21SMToimintaterapeutti (AMK)
-
SKO21SMKuntoutuksen ohjaaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 35
Teachers
- Tuula Kotikoski
Groups
-
TIC21S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material in Moodle workspace.
Reference literature:
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Kananen, J. 2011. Rafting through the thesis process : step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylä : JAMK University of Applied Sciences, 2011
Teaching methods
Online implementation - webinars and lectures in Zoom, independent study, assignments completed in small groups, learning assignments.
Link to Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/9925791129
Exam dates and retake possibilities
There is no exam in the course. The assignments and project assignments with their timetables are presented in the first webinar.
Alternative completion methods
The methods of accreditation are described in the Degree Regulations and study guide. The course lecturer will provide information on the specific practices of the course.
Student workload
The course is 5 ECTS = 135 hrs of student work (1 ECTS=27hrs student work)
- webinars and online lectures approx. 20 hrs
- independent study (material and assignments) approx. 40 hrs
- assignments and course assignment approx. 75hrs
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Aikataulu ilmoitetaan myöhemmin.
Further information for students
The course is assessed with 0-5 scale. The assessment criteria are presented in the first webinar.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
28.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Construction and Civil Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lähdesmäki
Teacher in charge
Pekka Lähdesmäki
Groups
-
TRY20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Construction and Civil Engineering
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons (live Zoom will be used if necessary), self-studying, assignments and group works.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Tällä toteutuksella ei ole tenttiä.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
lessons 9 h
Thesis application workshop 10h
Independent studying 40 h
Learning assignments 50
Thesis subject 26 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Opintojakso koostuu 3 op yhteisestä osuudesta ja 2 op itsenäisestä osuudesta (opinnäytetyö aihe-ehdotus) ". " op itsenäinen osuus suositellaan suoritettavaksi yhteisen osuuden jälkeen.
Tavoite on saada aihe-ehdotus valmiiksi ja opinnäytetyö käyntiin viimeistään lokakuussa.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2023 - 24.08.2023
Timing
23.08.2023 - 19.12.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Henri Kervola
Groups
-
TLS23KMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS20KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
TLS23SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS21KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Toteutus on tarkoitettu logistiikan monimuoto-opiskelijiolle. Opintojakso tulee suorittaa edeltävänä lukukautena kuin, milloin aikoo tehdä opinnäytetyön. Toteutus sisältää verkkoluentoja ja tehtäviä.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Student workload
Yksi opintopiste tarkoittaa laskennallisesti keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä eli viiden opintopisteen opintojakson kuormitus on noin 135 h.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.04.2023 - 30.04.2023
Timing
22.05.2023 - 16.06.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- kp502 sosiaalialan yliopettaja
- Katri Ylönen
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.04.2023 - 30.04.2023
Timing
22.05.2023 - 31.08.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Kristiina Juntunen
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SAR21S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR22K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.04.2023 - 30.04.2023
Timing
16.05.2023 - 31.07.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Service Business
Teachers
- Tarja Niemelä
Groups
-
MPT21SMPalveluliiketoiminnan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
MPT21S1Palveluliiketoiminnan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Alternative completion methods
You can complete the course by combining study and work, by studification. Agree on studification of the course with the lecturer in charge of the course. For more information on studification, see the degree regulations and study guide.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 06.01.2023
Timing
13.03.2023 - 20.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- English
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Marjo Palovaara
- Suleiman Kamau
Teacher in charge
Marjo Palovaara
Groups
-
SNS23VKBachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing, vaihto-opiskelu/Exchange studies
-
SNS21SG2Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi. Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Other materials recommended by the teacher.
Teaching methods
Contact lessons
Learning seminars
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Evaluation is on the basis of seminar assignments.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
01.03.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Kristiina Juntunen
- Katri Ylönen
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
06.02.2023 - 12.02.2023
Timing
13.02.2023 - 26.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Teachers
- Piotr Krawczyk
Groups
-
HBI23VKKBachelor’s degree in Business Administration, Kedge Business School
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance. However, if the COVID-19 situation requires the learning will be supported by online tutorials.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Learning materials and recommended literature
Textbook:
Research methods for Business Students; Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, Adrian Thornhill, additional virtual material available
Please Note ! Research methods for business students, 4th ed. 2006 / Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, Adrian Thornhill is now freely available to you via JAMK on-campus and Intranet Library
JAMK's thesis-related directions in the Study Guide
School-specific directions on the dedicated learning platform and
Elmo Student
Online study materials on Information retrieval
Stevens, J., & Crawford, S. 2014. Project reporting instructions. Adapted from Raportointiohje [Reporting instructions] by Liukko, S., & Perttula, S. 2013. JAMK University of Applied Sciences’ open learning materials. Accessed on 12 March 2014. Retrieved from http - //oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/project reporting instructions
Other relevant materials.
Teaching methods
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance. However, if the COVID-19 situation requires the learning will be supported by online tutorials.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Lectures, course project/group assignments, thesis proposal/individual assignment, exam test.
Course ILOs - Intended Learning Outcomes:
IBCRI Skills in Critical and Analytical Understanding
Critically review, analyze, and understand the information available from academic and professional business sources in the context of thesis planning, design, and implementation process.
IBCOM Communication Skills
Communicate responsibly, effectively, and professionally in English in oral and written formats in the context of planning, design, and implementation process.
IBETH Ethical Conduct
Embrace ethical conduct in practice and decision-making in the context of thesis planning, design, and implementation process. This may be according to the Principles for Responsible Management Education (UNPRME) or the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations.
Practical training and working life connections
Thesis as part of double degree diploma and/or overseas internship.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
International connections
The course is available for Double Degree students and Study Abroad students from JAMK's partner institutions around the world.
Alternative completion methods
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance. However, if the COVID-19 situation requires the learning will be supported by online tutorials.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Student workload
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Total 125-155 hours
Content scheduling
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Weekly lectures, workshops, and assignments.
Fall semester the course ends at the latest in the third week of December.
Spring semester the course ends at the latest at the end of May.
More details to be announced during the course.
Further information for students
Open UAS: 4 (included in the total capacity)
The student understands what a research process includes, how to formulate a research topic and research questions, do a literature review, understand research philosophies and approaches, formulate research design, is aware of research ethics and challenges in getting access to data/organizations as well as available sampling techniques. The student is aware of the different data sources, research methods, and strategies to choose from, as well as data collection techniques and procedures and analysis, and can draw basic conclusions. The student is familiar with JAMK thesis/diploma guidelines.
Upon completion of the course, you will be able to -
IBCRI Skills in Critical and Analytical Understanding
Critically review, analyze, and understand the information available from academic and professional business sources in the context of thesis planning, design, and implementation process.
IBCOM Communication Skills
Communicate responsibly, effectively, and professionally in English in oral and written formats in the context of planning, design, and implementation process.
IBETH Ethical Conduct
Embrace ethical conduct in practice and decision-making in the context of thesis planning, design, and implementation process. This may be according to the Principles for Responsible Management Education (UNPRME) or the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
07.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
13.02.2023 - 30.04.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 20
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Petri Vauhkonen
Teacher in charge
Petri Vauhkonen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Autumn semester 2022.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons, self-studying and learning assignments.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
No final exam.
Alternative completion methods
The admission procedures are described in the degree rule and the study guide. The teacher of the course will give you more information on possible specific course practices.
Student workload
One credit corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work, which means that the load of five credits is approximately 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
01.02.2023 - 28.04.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Teachers
- Shomaila Sadaf
- Mari Partanen
- Minna Tunkkari-Eskelinen
Groups
-
MTM21S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
-
MTM20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
-
MTM19S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures and tests
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- excercises and tests 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
11.01.2023 - 16.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- English
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Marjo Palovaara
- Suleiman Kamau
Teacher in charge
Marjo Palovaara
Groups
-
SNS22KKEBachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing, Kenia
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Kristiina Juntunen
- Merja Kurunsaari
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Anniina Berg
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SOS20S1Sosionomi
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR21SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Oppimateriaali ja suositeltava kirjallisuus
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja sen loukkausepäilyjen käsitteleminen Suomessa. 2013. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje 2012. www.tenk.fi
Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettinen ennakkoarviointi Suomessa. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje. 2019. https://tenk.fi/fi/eettinen-ennakkoarviointi-ihmistieteissa
Teaching methods
Verkko-opetus
Verkko-ohjaustyökalut
Oppimistehtävät yksilötehtävänä
Tentti
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti Moodlessa (1h)
Hylätty tentti voidaan uusia kaksi kertaa.
Student workload
Verkko-opetus 24 h
Itsenäinen opiskelu ja oppimistehtävät 101 h
Tenttiin valmistautuminen ja tentti 10 h
Yhteensä 135 h
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 10.03.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Aila Pikkarainen
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Oppimateriaali ja suositeltava kirjallisuus
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja sen loukkausepäilyjen käsitteleminen Suomessa. 2013. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje 2012. www.tenk.fi
Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettinen ennakkoarviointi Suomessa. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje. 2019. https://tenk.fi/fi/eettinen-ennakkoarviointi-ihmistieteissa
Teaching methods
Verkko-opetus
Verkko-ohjaustyökalut
Oppimistehtävät yksilötehtävänä
Tentti
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti Moodlessa (1h)
Hylätty tentti voidaan uusia kaksi kertaa.
Student workload
Verkko-opetus 24 h
Itsenäinen opiskelu ja oppimistehtävät 101 h
Tenttiin valmistautuminen ja tentti 10 h
Yhteensä 135 h
Further information for students
Kurssin arvosana perustuu tentin arvosanaan.
Lisäksi kurssin oppimistehtävät tulee olla hyväksytysti suoritettu.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Team Academy
Teachers
- Anu Manner
- Tero Lehtinen
- Kimmo Aho
- Tapu Holttinen
- Janne Roiha
- Jaana Larsson
Groups
-
HTA20S1Tiimiakatemian tutkinto-ohjelma
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
No regular online meetings.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
TAI
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
TAI
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
JA
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
TAI
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
TAI
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
Online course consisting of eight themes.
Each of the themes includes individual assignments.
Manner of performance: independent assignments and an exam.
Manner of guidance:
Compulsory starting for all.
Online learning activities and guidance on Moodle.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam needs to be done during the course. Failed exam can be re-sit twice.
Alternative completion methods
Crediting of the previous studies or competence is possible regarding to JAMK practicalities.
Student workload
Starting session 1 h
Independent study and assignments 124 h
Getting set for the exam and the exam 10 h
Total 135 h
Content scheduling
The course has eight themes. The duration of each themes is approximately a week. Each theme includes learning material and activities.
Further information for students
Course replaces former course ZZPP0610.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Paula Linna
- Riikka Ahlgren
Groups
-
HTL21SIYLiiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Evening hours every second week
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
TAI
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
TAI
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
JA
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
TAI
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
TAI
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
The course is held online and it has eight themes.
Each theme has independent assignments.
Guidance:
Mandatory introduction meeting (online)
Workshops (online)
Guidance in online-learning space (Moodle).
This course replaces the prior course ZZPP0610 Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminta.
Multi-mode students are prioritized for this implementation.
In addition, the amount of studied credits and starting year are used as enrolling criteria.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam must be done during the course.
Failed exam can be re-done two times during the course.
Alternative completion methods
This course can be replaced by relevant prior studies or knowledge. See the Jamk degree regulations for more information.
Student workload
Online workshops 8h
Independent studies and assignments 117h
Exam preparation and exam 10h
Total 135h
Content scheduling
The course has eigth themes. Each theme has 2-4 weeks time frame.
Each theme includes self studies (reading, videos) and assignments.
Further information for students
Continuous feedback
Self assessment
Peer feedback
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 14.04.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV20S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
-
TTV20S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
-
TTV20S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
-
TTV20S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Moodlen verkkotyötilassa oleva materiaali.
Kirjallisuutta:
Aaltio, I., Juuti, P. & Puusa, A. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Bister, T. 2019. Tietojenkäsittelyn opinnäytetyö: Viittoja ja karttoja tutkimisen ja kehittämisen teille. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 272. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2015. Tutki ja kirjoita. 20. painos. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2015. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittajan opas. Näin kirjoitan opinnäytetyön tai pro gradun alusta loppuun. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 202. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kananen, J. 2015. Verkkotutkimus opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 187. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. (Kirja sisältää laadullisen ja määrällisen tutkimuksen).
Kananen, J. 2019. Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas. Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 262. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Opinnäytetyön raportointi. Oppimateriaali. Uusin versio. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. https://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/.
Puusa, A., Juuti, P., Aaltio, I., Siltaoja, M., Puusa, A. & Sorsa, V. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Valli, R. & Aarnos, E. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 1, Metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu : virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Vilkka, H. 2021. Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä: Ratkaisut tutkimuksen umpikujiin. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Teaching methods
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: Zoom-verkkoluennot ja -webinaarit, itseopiskelu, pienryhmätyöskentely, harjoitustyöt ja oppimistehtävät. Zoom-linkki https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Opintojaksoon ei kuulu tenttiä. Opintojaksoon kuuluvat oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt aikatauluineen esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla ti 10.1.2023 klo 12.15-13.45 (Zoom).
Alternative completion methods
Hyväksilukemisen menettelytavat kuvataan tutkintosäännössä ja opinto-oppaassa. Opintojakson opettaja antaa lisätietoa mahdollisista opintojakson erityiskäytänteistä.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus 5 op = 135 opiskelijan työtuntia (1 op tarkoittaa keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä)
- verkkoluennot ja webinaarit n. 20 tuntia
- opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen (itseopiskelu) n. 40 tuntia
- oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt n. 75 tuntia
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Luennot tiistaisin klo 12.15-13.45 Zoomissa. Aloitus ti 10.1.2023.
Further information for students
Opintojakso arvioidaan skaalalla 0-5. Arviointiperusteet esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 14.04.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV20S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
-
TTV20S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
-
TTV20S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
-
TTV20S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Moodlen verkkotyötilassa oleva materiaali.
Kirjallisuutta:
Aaltio, I., Juuti, P. & Puusa, A. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Bister, T. 2019. Tietojenkäsittelyn opinnäytetyö: Viittoja ja karttoja tutkimisen ja kehittämisen teille. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 272. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2015. Tutki ja kirjoita. 20. painos. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2015. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittajan opas. Näin kirjoitan opinnäytetyön tai pro gradun alusta loppuun. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 202. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kananen, J. 2015. Verkkotutkimus opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 187. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. (Kirja sisältää laadullisen ja määrällisen tutkimuksen).
Kananen, J. 2019. Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas. Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 262. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Opinnäytetyön raportointi. Oppimateriaali. Uusin versio. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. https://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/.
Puusa, A., Juuti, P., Aaltio, I., Siltaoja, M., Puusa, A. & Sorsa, V. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Valli, R. & Aarnos, E. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 1, Metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu : virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Vilkka, H. 2021. Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä: Ratkaisut tutkimuksen umpikujiin. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Teaching methods
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: Zoom-verkkoluennot ja -webinaarit, itseopiskelu, pienryhmätyöskentely, harjoitustyöt ja oppimistehtävät. Zoom-linkki https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Opintojaksoon ei kuulu tenttiä. Opintojaksoon kuuluvat oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt aikatauluineen esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla ke 11.1.2023 klo 11.30-13 (Zoom).
Alternative completion methods
Hyväksilukemisen menettelytavat kuvataan tutkintosäännössä ja opinto-oppaassa. Opintojakson opettaja antaa lisätietoa mahdollisista opintojakson erityiskäytänteistä.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus 5 op = 135 opiskelijan työtuntia (1 op tarkoittaa keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä)
- verkkoluennot ja webinaarit n. 20 tuntia
- opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen (itseopiskelu) n. 40 tuntia
- oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt n. 75 tuntia
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Luennot keskiviikkoisin klo 11.30-13 Zoomissa. Aloitus ke 11.1.2023.
Further information for students
Opintojakso arvioidaan skaalalla 0-5. Arviointiperusteet esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 28.04.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 100
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Technology
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Electrical and Automation Engineering
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Petri Luosma
- Marjukka Nuutinen
- Hannu Kivistö
- Olli Väänänen
Groups
-
TKN20SBKonetekniikka (AMK)
-
TKN18SMKonetekniikka
-
TKN20SAKonetekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA19SMSähkö- ja automaatiotekniikka
-
TER20SMEnergia- ja ympäristötekniikka (AMK)
-
TSA19SABachelor's Degree Programme in Electrical and Automation Engineering
-
TSA19SBBachelor's Degree Programme in Electrical and Automation Engineering
-
TER20S1Energia- ja ympäristötekniikka
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Kananen, J. 2015. Online Research for Preparing your Thesis. Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 198.Kananen, J. 2011. Rafting Through the Thesis Process: Step by Step Guide to thesis Process. . Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 114.Field-specific methodological literature.
Teaching methods
Lectures, information retrieval and applied learning assigments. Assignments in groups are based on Problem-based learning. In distance learning the assignments are done individually.
Student workload
Distance lectures max. 28 h, exercises and independent studies 107 h total 135 h
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 24.04.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Service Business
Teachers
- Sari-Maarit Peltola
Groups
-
MPT21S1Palveluliiketoiminnan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks and tests 70 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- thesis subject 15 h
- thesis seminars 6 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Information Technology
Teachers
- Shomaila Sadaf
Groups
-
HTG20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Information Technology
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures and tests
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- excercises and tests 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Information Technology
Teachers
- Paula Linna
Groups
-
HTK19S1Tietojenkäsittely
-
HTK20S1Tietojenkäsittely
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures or Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done individually.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis topic 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 11.03.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
- Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Tiina Blek
Groups
-
SOK22KSKätilö (AMK), päivätoteutus
-
SAR22K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
The webinars take place at the Zoom address, which is announced in the Moodle learning environment.
Moodle opens about a week before the start of the study period.
Webinars are recorded.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Webinars
Online exam
Practical training and working life connections
-
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Teija Koskinen
Groups
-
HTL21S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
OR
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
OR
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
AND
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
OR
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
OR
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
The course has themes. The themes include following steps that support the learning process:
1. independent study of the subject, following tasks and assignments
2. expert lectures related to the subject area
3. compulsory learning tasks done during the contact lessons
4. personal learning assignments
Guidance will be available during the course as follows:
1. Each contact lessons starts with an introduction and guidance to the theme and subject
2. Guidance and learning support for the learning tasks done in classroom
3. Evaluation of the learning tasks with the scale Failed/Passed or numeral scale
4. Peer feedback on the selected learning tasks
5. Written feedback on the learning platform according to the task descriptions.
Practical training and working life connections
This course has a research project, which can be done for a case organisation.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exams must be done during the course.
Alternative completion methods
This course applies the Jamk practices on the recognition of the prior learning.
Student workload
Contact lessons 25h
Independent studies 40h
Exams and assignments 70h
Total 135h
Further information for students
Teacher's assessments
Self assessments
Peer assessments
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Teija Koskinen
Groups
-
HTL21S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL21SIYLiiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
OR
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
OR
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
AND
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
OR
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
OR
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
The course has themes. The themes include following steps that support the learning process:
1. independent study of the subject, following tasks and assignments
2. expert lectures related to the subject area
3. compulsory learning tasks done during the contact lessons
4. personal learning assignments
Guidance will be available during the course as follows:
1. Each contact lessons starts with an introduction and guidance to the theme and subject
2. Guidance and learning support for the learning tasks done in classroom
3. Evaluation of the learning tasks with the scale Failed/Passed or numeral scale
4. Peer feedback on the selected learning tasks
5. Written feedback on the learning platform according to the task descriptions.
Practical training and working life connections
This course has a research project, which can be done for a case organisation.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam must be done during the course.
Alternative completion methods
This course applies the Jamk practices on the recognition of the prior learning.
Student workload
Contact lessons 20h
Independent studies 105h
Exam and preparations 10h
Total 135h
Content scheduling
This course has eight themes.
Further information for students
Teacher's assessments
Self assessments
Peer assessments
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 15.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
2 op
Mode of delivery
60 % Face-to-face, 40 % Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- English
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 26
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Salla Grommi
Groups
-
SAR23KM2Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
09.01.2023 - 19.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 20
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Henri Kervola
Teacher in charge
Henri Kervola
Groups
-
TLS19KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
LOGRAKVERKKOLogistiikan ja rakentamisen verkko-opetus
-
TLS20KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
ZJATLS22SMMAvoin amk, Logistiikka, Monimuoto
-
TLS21KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22SMMLogistiikka - tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja sen loukkausepäilyjen käsitteleminen Suomessa. 2013. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje 2012. www.tenk.fi
Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettinen ennakkoarviointi Suomessa. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje. 2019. https://tenk.fi/fi/eettinen-ennakkoarviointi-ihmistieteissa
Teaching methods
The implementation is intended for distance learning students in logistics. Implementation includes virtual contacts, learning assignments and the submission of a thesis topic proposal.
Student workload
One credit corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work, which means that the load of five credits is approximately 135 hours. The load is distributed in different ways depending on the course implementation.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2022 - 05.01.2023
Timing
01.01.2023 - 21.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
3 op
RDI portion
3 op
Mode of delivery
40 % Face-to-face, 60 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Institute of Bioeconomy
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Laura Vertainen
Groups
-
LMS20S1Maaseutuelinkeinot
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 40 h
- learning tasks 65 h
- studying the course material 30 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
04.11.2022 - 24.02.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Finnish Music Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Music Pedagogue
Teachers
- Eeva Oksala
Groups
-
KPD20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Music
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
4.11.2022-24.2.2023
Verkkoluennot perjantaisin 8.45-11.45 Zoomissa (https://jamk.zoom.us/j/63890734293)
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
02.10.2022 - 31.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Service Business
Teachers
- Tarja Niemelä
Groups
-
MPT21SMPalveluliiketoiminnan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Online implementation
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- excercises and tests 26h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 21.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Tiina Kuukkanen
- Kristina Grahn
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 21.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Tiina Kuukkanen
- Kristina Grahn
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 21.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Kristina Grahn
- Kristiina Juntunen
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 21.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Aila Pikkarainen
- Merja Kurunsaari
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 23.10.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Tiina Kuukkanen
- Anniina Berg
Groups
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 16.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV20SMTieto- ja viestintätekniikka
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Moodlen verkkotyötilassa oleva materiaali.
Kirjallisuutta:
Aaltio, I., Juuti, P. & Puusa, A. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Bister, T. 2019. Tietojenkäsittelyn opinnäytetyö: Viittoja ja karttoja tutkimisen ja kehittämisen teille. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 272. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2015. Tutki ja kirjoita. 20. painos. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2015. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittajan opas. Näin kirjoitan opinnäytetyön tai pro gradun alusta loppuun. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 202. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kananen, J. 2015. Verkkotutkimus opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 187. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. (Kirja sisältää laadullisen ja määrällisen tutkimuksen).
Kananen, J. 2019. Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas. Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 262. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Opinnäytetyön raportointi. Oppimateriaali. Uusin versio. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. https://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/.
Puusa, A., Juuti, P., Aaltio, I., Siltaoja, M., Puusa, A. & Sorsa, V. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Valli, R. & Aarnos, E. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 1, Metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu : virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Vilkka, H. 2021. Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä: Ratkaisut tutkimuksen umpikujiin. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Teaching methods
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: Zoom-verkkoluennot ja -webinaarit, itseopiskelu, pienryhmätyöskentely, harjoitustyöt ja oppimistehtävät. Zoom-linkki https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Opintojaksoon ei kuulu tenttiä. Opintojaksoon kuuluvat oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt aikatauluineen esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla.
Alternative completion methods
Hyväksilukemisen menettelytavat kuvataan tutkintosäännössä ja opinto-oppaassa. Opintojakson opettaja antaa lisätietoa mahdollisista opintojakson erityiskäytänteistä.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus 5 op = 135 opiskelijan työtuntia (1 op tarkoittaa keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä)
- verkkoluennot ja webinaarit n. 20 tuntia
- opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen (itseopiskelu) n. 40 tuntia
- oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt n. 75 tuntia
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa.
Aloituswebinaari pe 2.9.2022 klo 15.30-17 Zoomissa https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123.
Syksyn muut kokoontumiset (varmistetaan aloituskerralla):
pe 16.9.2022 klo 15.30-18.30
pe 30.9.2022 klo 15.30-18.30
pe 14.10.2022 klo 15.30-18.30
pe 28.10.2022 klo 15.30-18.30
pe 11.11.2022 klo 15.30-18.30
Further information for students
Opintojakso arvioidaan skaalalla 0-5. Arviointiperusteet esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 16.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Information and Communications Technology
Teachers
- Raija Hämäläinen
Groups
-
TTV20S5Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
-
TTV20S3Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
-
TTV20S2Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
-
TTV20S1Tieto- ja viestintätekniikka
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Moodlen verkkotyötilassa oleva materiaali.
Kirjallisuutta:
Aaltio, I., Juuti, P. & Puusa, A. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Bister, T. 2019. Tietojenkäsittelyn opinnäytetyö: Viittoja ja karttoja tutkimisen ja kehittämisen teille. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 272. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P. & Sajavaara, P. 2015. Tutki ja kirjoita. 20. painos. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2015. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittajan opas. Näin kirjoitan opinnäytetyön tai pro gradun alusta loppuun. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 202. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Kananen, J. 2015. Verkkotutkimus opinnäytetyönä. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 187. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. (Kirja sisältää laadullisen ja määrällisen tutkimuksen).
Kananen, J. 2019. Opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun pikaopas. Avain opinnäytetyön ja pro gradun kirjoittamiseen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja 262. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu.
Liukko, S. & Perttula, S. Opinnäytetyön raportointi. Oppimateriaali. Uusin versio. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu. https://oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/raportointiohje/.
Puusa, A., Juuti, P., Aaltio, I., Siltaoja, M., Puusa, A. & Sorsa, V. 2020. Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Tang, H. 2021. Engineering research: Design, methods, and publication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Valli, R. & Aaltola, J. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 2, Näkökulmia aloittelevalle tutkijalle tutkimuksen teoreettisiin lähtökohtiin ja analyysimenetelmiin. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Valli, R. & Aarnos, E. 2018. Ikkunoita tutkimusmetodeihin: 1, Metodin valinta ja aineistonkeruu : virikkeitä aloittelevalle tutkijalle. 5., uudistettu painos. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Vilkka, H. 2021. Näin onnistut opinnäytetyössä: Ratkaisut tutkimuksen umpikujiin. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Teaching methods
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: Zoom-verkkoluennot ja -webinaarit, itseopiskelu, pienryhmätyöskentely, harjoitustyöt ja oppimistehtävät. Zoom-linkki https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Opintojaksoon ei kuulu tenttiä. Opintojaksoon kuuluvat oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt aikatauluineen esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla ti 30.8.2022 klo 11.30-13 (Zoom).
Alternative completion methods
Hyväksilukemisen menettelytavat kuvataan tutkintosäännössä ja opinto-oppaassa. Opintojakson opettaja antaa lisätietoa mahdollisista opintojakson erityiskäytänteistä.
Student workload
Opintojakson laajuus 5 op = 135 opiskelijan työtuntia (1 op tarkoittaa keskimäärin 27 tunnin työtä)
- verkkoluennot ja webinaarit n. 20 tuntia
- opiskelumateriaaliin perehtyminen (itseopiskelu) n. 40 tuntia
- oppimistehtävät ja harjoitustyöt n. 75 tuntia
Content scheduling
Toteutus kokonaan verkossa: https://jamk.zoom.us/j/8786743123
Luennot tiistaisin klo 11.30-13 Zoomissa. Aloitus ti 30.8.2022.
Further information for students
Opintojakso arvioidaan skaalalla 0-5. Arviointiperusteet esitellään opintojakson aloituskerralla.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 28.10.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Teachers
- Elina Vaara
- Minna Tunkkari-Eskelinen
Groups
-
MTM20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- excercises and tests 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 16.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in International Business
Teachers
- Piotr Krawczyk
Groups
-
HBI22S1Degree Programme in International Business
-
ZJAHBI22S1Avoin AMK, IB, AMK-polut, International Business
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance. However, if the COVID-19 situation requires the learning will be supported by online tutorials.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Learning materials and recommended literature
Textbook:
Research methods for Business Students; Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, Adrian Thornhill, additional virtual material available
Please Note ! Research methods for business students, 4th ed. 2006 / Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, Adrian Thornhill is now freely available to you via JAMK on-campus and Intranet Library
JAMK's thesis-related directions in the Study Guide
School-specific directions on the dedicated learning platform and
Elmo Student
Online study materials on Information retrieval
Stevens, J., & Crawford, S. 2014. Project reporting instructions. Adapted from Raportointiohje [Reporting instructions] by Liukko, S., & Perttula, S. 2013. JAMK University of Applied Sciences’ open learning materials. Accessed on 12 March 2014. Retrieved from http - //oppimateriaalit.jamk.fi/project reporting instructions
Other relevant materials.
Teaching methods
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance. However, if the COVID-19 situation requires the learning will be supported by online tutorials.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Lectures, course project/group assignments, thesis proposal/individual assignment, exam test.
Course ILOs - Intended Learning Outcomes:
IBCRI Skills in Critical and Analytical Understanding
Critically review, analyze, and understand the information available from academic and professional business sources in the context of thesis planning, design, and implementation process.
IBCOM Communication Skills
Communicate responsibly, effectively, and professionally in English in oral and written formats in the context of planning, design, and implementation process.
IBETH Ethical Conduct
Embrace ethical conduct in practice and decision-making in the context of thesis planning, design, and implementation process. This may be according to the Principles for Responsible Management Education (UNPRME) or the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations.
Practical training and working life connections
Thesis as part of double degree diploma and/or overseas internship.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
International connections
The course is available for Double Degree students and Study Abroad students from JAMK's partner institutions around the world.
Alternative completion methods
The primary mode of delivery is a combination of in-class activities on campus and online lectures. The lectures will be recorded to support opportunities for 24/7 learning. The in-class activities deepen the learning in the forms of tutorials, individual and group work, reflection and guidance. However, if the COVID-19 situation requires the learning will be supported by online tutorials.
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Student workload
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Total 125-155 hours
Content scheduling
Detailed and up-to-date information is available in the course workspace (Learning Environment).
Weekly lectures, workshops, and assignments.
Fall semester the course ends at the latest in the third week of December.
Spring semester the course ends at the latest at the end of May.
More details to be announced during the course.
Further information for students
Open UAS: 4 (included in the total capacity)
The student understands what a research process includes, how to formulate a research topic and research questions, do a literature review, understand research philosophies and approaches, formulate research design, is aware of research ethics and challenges in getting access to data/organizations as well as available sampling techniques. The student is aware of the different data sources, research methods, and strategies to choose from, as well as data collection techniques and procedures and analysis, and can draw basic conclusions. The student is familiar with JAMK thesis/diploma guidelines.
Upon completion of the course, you will be able to -
IBCRI Skills in Critical and Analytical Understanding
Critically review, analyze, and understand the information available from academic and professional business sources in the context of thesis planning, design, and implementation process.
IBCOM Communication Skills
Communicate responsibly, effectively, and professionally in English in oral and written formats in the context of planning, design, and implementation process.
IBETH Ethical Conduct
Embrace ethical conduct in practice and decision-making in the context of thesis planning, design, and implementation process. This may be according to the Principles for Responsible Management Education (UNPRME) or the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 20.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- English
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Marjo Palovaara
- Suleiman Kamau
Teacher in charge
Marjo Palovaara
Groups
-
SNS22VSBachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing, vaihto-opiskelu/Exchange studies
-
SNS21SG1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi. Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Other materials recommended by the teacher.
Teaching methods
Contact lessons
Learning seminars
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Evaluation is on the basis of seminar assignments.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 21.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Riikka Ahlgren
Groups
-
HTL21S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
TAI
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
TAI
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
JA
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
OR
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
OR
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
Contact lessons.
Independent tasks and exam.
Practical training and working life connections
This course has a research project, which can be done for a case organisation.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam must be done during the course.
Alternative completion methods
This course uses Jamk practices on the recognition of the prior learning.
Student workload
Contact lessons 20h
Independent studies 105h
Exam and preparations 10h
Total 135h
Content scheduling
This course has eight themes.
Further information for students
Teacher's assessments
Self assessments
Peer assessments
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 21.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Riikka Ahlgren
Groups
-
HTL21S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL21SIYLiiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
No regular meetings.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
OR
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
OR
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
AND
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
OR
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
OR
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
This course is held for daytime students. The course can also be studied by the multi-mode students.
The course is held online and it has eight themes.
Each theme has independent assignments.
Guidance:
Mandatory introduction meeting (online)
Guidance in online-learning space (Moodle).
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam must be done during the course.
Failed exam can be re-done two times during the course.
Alternative completion methods
This course can be replaced by relevant prior studies or knowledge. See the Jamk degree regulations for more information.
Student workload
Introduction 1h
Indendent studies and assignments 114h
Exam preparation and exam 20h
Total 135h
Content scheduling
The course has eigth themes. Each theme has 2-4 weeks time frame.
Each theme includes self studies (reading, videos) and assignments.
Further information for students
This course replaces the prior course ZZPP0610 Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminta.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 31.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Electrical and Automation Engineering
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Technology
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Mechanical Engineering
Teachers
- Olli Väänänen
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Kananen, J. 2015. Online Research for Preparing your Thesis. Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 198.Kananen, J. 2011. Rafting Through the Thesis Process: Step by Step Guide to thesis Process. . Publications of Jamk University of Applied Sciences 114.Field-specific methodological literature.
Teaching methods
Lectures, information retrieval and applied learning assigments. Assignments in groups are based on Problem-based learning. In distance learning the assignments are done individually.
Student workload
Distance lectures max. 28 h, exercises and independent studies 107 h total 135 h
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 21.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 20
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Henri Kervola
Teacher in charge
Henri Kervola
Groups
-
TLS19KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
LOGRAKVERKKOLogistiikan ja rakentamisen verkko-opetus
-
TLS20KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
TLS21KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja sen loukkausepäilyjen käsitteleminen Suomessa. 2013. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje 2012. www.tenk.fi
Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettinen ennakkoarviointi Suomessa. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje. 2019. https://tenk.fi/fi/eettinen-ennakkoarviointi-ihmistieteissa
Teaching methods
The implementation is intended for distance learning students in logistics. Implementation includes virtual contacts, learning assignments and the submission of a thesis topic proposal.
Student workload
One credit corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work, which means that the load of five credits is approximately 135 hours. The load is distributed in different ways depending on the course implementation.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
12.09.2022 - 19.09.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 16.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 60
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Paula Linna
- Teija Koskinen
Teacher in charge
Riikka Ahlgren
Groups
-
HTL21S1Liiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
HTL20IYBachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
-
HTL20S1Liiketalous
-
HTL21SIYLiiketalouden tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
OR
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
OR
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
AND
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
OR
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
OR
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
The course can also be studied by the multi-mode students.
The course is held online and it has eight themes.
Each theme has independent assignments.
Guidance:
Mandatory introduction meetings (online)
Guidance in online-learning space (Moodle).
Exam dates and retake possibilities
The exam must be done during the course.
Failed exam can be re-done two times during the course.
Alternative completion methods
This course can be replaced by relevant prior studies or knowledge. See the Jamk degree regulations for more information.
Student workload
Webinars 14h
Indendent studies and assignments 101h
Exam preparation and exam 20h
Total 135h
Content scheduling
The course has eigth themes. Each theme has 2-4 weeks time frame.
Each theme includes self studies (reading, videos) and assignments.
Further information for students
This course replaces the prior course ZZPP0610 Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminta.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 21.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
3 op
Mode of delivery
40 % Face-to-face, 60 % Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Petri Vauhkonen
Teacher in charge
Petri Vauhkonen
Groups
-
TLS19S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Autumn semester 2022.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons, self-studying and learning assignments.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
No final exam.
Alternative completion methods
The admission procedures are described in the degree rule and the study guide. The teacher of the course will give you more information on possible specific course practices.
Student workload
One credit corresponds to an average of 27 hours of work, which means that the load of five credits is approximately 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.08.2022 - 25.08.2022
Timing
29.08.2022 - 21.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Construction and Civil Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lähdesmäki
Teacher in charge
Pekka Lähdesmäki
Groups
-
TRY19S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Construction and Civil Engineering
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons (live Zoom will be used if necessary), self-studying, assignments and group works.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Tällä toteutuksella ei ole tenttiä.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
lessons 9 h
Independent studying 40 h
Learning assignments 60
Thesis subject 26 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Opintojakso koostuu 3 op yhteisestä osuudesta ja 2 op itsenäisestä osuudesta (opinnäytetyö aihe-ehdotus) ". " op itsenäinen osuus suositellaan suoritettavaksi yhteisen osuuden jälkeen.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 30.04.2022
Timing
23.05.2022 - 31.07.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Service Business
Teachers
- Tarja Niemelä
Groups
-
MPT20S1Palveluliiketoiminta
-
MPT20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Service Business
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.12.2021 - 30.04.2022
Timing
23.05.2022 - 22.06.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Tiina Blek
Teacher in charge
Tiina Blek
Groups
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR19S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR19SMSairaanhoitaja
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.12.2021 - 30.04.2022
Timing
23.05.2022 - 22.06.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Tiina Kuukkanen
- Sami Hoisko
Teacher in charge
Tiina Kuukkanen
Groups
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
STT19SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SOS19S1Sosionomi
-
SKO19SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SOS19SMSosionomi
-
SOS20S1Sosionomi
-
STT19S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SFT19SMFysioterapeutti
-
SAR19S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR19SMSairaanhoitaja
-
SFT19S1Fysioterapeutti
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.12.2021 - 30.04.2022
Timing
23.05.2022 - 22.06.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Kristiina Juntunen
- Aila Pikkarainen
Teacher in charge
Kristiina Juntunen
Groups
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
STT19SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SOS19S1Sosionomi
-
SKO19SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SOS19SMSosionomi
-
SOS20S1Sosionomi
-
STT19S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SFT19SMFysioterapeutti
-
SAR19S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR19SMSairaanhoitaja
-
SFT19S1Fysioterapeutti
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
21.03.2022 - 19.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
2 op
Mode of delivery
60 % Face-to-face, 40 % Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Marjo Palovaara
- Suleiman Kamau
Teacher in charge
Marjo Palovaara
Groups
-
SNS20SG1Degree Programme in Nursing
-
SNS22VKBachelor's Degree Programme in Nursing, vaihto-opiskelu/Exchange studies
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Further information for students
exchange student 5
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
09.03.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Teachers
- Timo Lehtonen
- Anu Manner
- Kimmo Aho
- Tapu Holttinen
- Janne Roiha
- Jaana Larsson
- Pekka Pirinen
Groups
-
HTA19S1Tiimiakatemian tutkinto-ohjelma
-
HTA20S1Tiimiakatemian tutkinto-ohjelma
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Ei säännöllisiä tapaamisia.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
TAI
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
TAI
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
JA
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
TAI
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
TAI
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
Verkko-opintojakso, joka koostuu kahdeksasta teemasta.
Kuhunkin teemaan liittyy itsenäiset tehtävät.
Suoritustavat: Itsenäiset tehtävät ja tentti.
Ohjaustavat:
Pakollinen aloitustapaaminen (online).
Verkko-oppimisympäristön ohjaustyökalut (Moodle).
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Tentti on suoritettava opintojakson aikana, mutta muutoin suoritusaika on vapaa.
Hylätyn tentin voi uusia kaksi kertaa opintojakson aikana.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojaksolla on käytössä hyväksiluvun käytänteistä korvaaminen aiemmilla opinnoilla tai aiemmin hankitun osaamisen hyväksiluku. Tarkemmat ohjeet saat tutkintosäännöstä ja JAMK-intrasta.
Student workload
Aloituswebinaari 1h
Itsenäinen opiskelu ja itsenäiset tehtävät 124h
Tenttiin valmistautuminen ja tentti 10h
Yhteensä 135h
Content scheduling
Opintojaksolla on kahdeksan teemaa. Kullekin teemalle on keskimäärin noin viikko suoritusaikaa. Kukin teema sisältää oppimateriaalia (lukemista, videoita) ja harjoitustehtäviä.
Further information for students
Tämä opintojakso korvaa aiemman opintojakson ZZPP0610 Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminta.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
07.02.2022 - 28.02.2022
Timing
14.02.2022 - 27.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Teachers
- Piotr Krawczyk
Groups
-
HBI22VKKBachelor’s degree in Business Administration, Kedge Business School
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS COURSE IS EXCLUSIVELY SUITED TO IN-CLASS DELIVERY. ALL TEACHING WILL BE CONDUCTED IN CAMPUS. THE PROSPECTIVE STUDENTS WILL NEED TO BE PRESENT IN VARIOUS LECTURES HELD AT JAMK MAIN CAMPUS.
Further information for students
For Kedge BS students (HBI22VKK): 25
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
01.02.2022 - 30.04.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Teachers
- Elina Vaara
- Minna Tunkkari-Eskelinen
Groups
-
MTM20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
-
MTM19S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Tourism Management
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- excercises and tests 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
24.01.2022 - 15.04.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Service Business
Teachers
- Tarja Niemelä
- Elina Vaara
Groups
-
MPT20S1Palveluliiketoiminta
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- excercises and tests 26h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Riikka Ahlgren
Groups
-
HTL20IYBachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
-
HTL20S1Liiketalous
-
HTL21KIYBachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Time and location
Ei säännöllisiä tapaamisia.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
TAI
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
TAI
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
JA
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
TAI
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
TAI
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
Verkko-opintojakso, joka koostuu kahdeksasta teemasta.
Kuhunkin teemaan liittyy itsenäiset tehtävät.
Suoritustavat: Itsenäiset tehtävät ja tentti.
Ohjaustavat:
Pakollinen aloitustapaaminen (online).
Verkko-oppimisympäristön ohjaustyökalut (Moodle).
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Tentti on suoritettava opintojakson aikana, mutta muutoin suoritusaika on vapaa.
Hylätyn tentin voi uusia kaksi kertaa opintojakson aikana.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojaksolla on käytössä hyväksiluvun käytänteistä korvaaminen aiemmilla opinnoilla tai aiemmin hankitun osaamisen hyväksiluku. Tarkemmat ohjeet saat tutkintosäännöstä ja JAMK-intrasta.
Student workload
Aloituswebinaari 1h
Itsenäinen opiskelu ja itsenäiset tehtävät 124h
Tenttiin valmistautuminen ja tentti 10h
Yhteensä 135h
Content scheduling
Opintojaksolla on kahdeksan teemaa. Kullekin teemalle on keskimäärin 2 viikkoa suoritusaikaa. Kukin teema sisältää oppimateriaalia (lukemista, videoita) ja harjoitustehtäviä.
Further information for students
Tämä opintojakso korvaa aiemman opintojakson ZZPP0610 Tutkimus- ja kehittämistoiminta.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 80
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Management
Teachers
- Paula Linna
- Riikka Ahlgren
Groups
-
HTL20S1Liiketalous
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino.
TAI
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi.
TAI
Metsämuuronen, J. (toim.) 2006. Laadullisen tutkimuksen käsikirja. Helsinki: International Methelp.
JA
Metsämuuronen, J. 2011. Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Opiskelijalaitos. 2. laitos (4. laitoksen pohjalta). Helsinki: International Methelp.
TAI
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
TAI
Kananen, J. 2011. Kvantti: Kvantitatiivisen opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylän amk:n julkaisuja 118.
Teaching methods
Online webinars.
Different assingments and online exams during the course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Verkkotentti pitää suorittaa opintojakson aikana, itse valitsemanasi ajankohtana.
Hylätyn tentin voi uusia kaksi kertaa.
Student workload
Contact lessons (webinars) c. 25h
Independent studies 95h
Online exams and preparations 15h
Total 135h
Further information for students
Opintojakson arvosana pohjautuu tehtäviin ja verkkotenttiin.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 29.04.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 10
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in International Logistics
Teachers
- Anna Riikonen
Groups
-
TLE18S1Degree Programme in International Logistics
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This course is for International Logistics students.
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons, self-studying, group works and assignments.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
This course doesn´t have an exam.
Student workload
Contact lessons 9 h
Independent studying 40 h
Learning assignments 60
Thesis subject 26 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
10.01.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 20
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Henri Kervola
Teacher in charge
Henri Kervola
Groups
-
TLS19KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
TLS20KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
TLS21KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS22KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS18KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja sen loukkausepäilyjen käsitteleminen Suomessa. 2013. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje 2012. www.tenk.fi
Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettinen ennakkoarviointi Suomessa. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje. 2019. https://tenk.fi/fi/eettinen-ennakkoarviointi-ihmistieteissa
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
03.01.2022 - 13.03.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 30
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
Teachers
- Tiina Blek
Groups
-
SOK21K1Degree programme in Midwifery
-
SOK21KSKätilö (AMK), päivätoteutus
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
03.01.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Tiina Blek
- Merja Kurunsaari
Teacher in charge
Merja Kurunsaari
Groups
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
STT19SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SOS19S1Sosionomi
-
SKO19SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SOS19SMSosionomi
-
SOS20S1Sosionomi
-
STT19S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SAR19KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR19K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SFT19SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT19S1Fysioterapeutti
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
03.01.2022 - 11.03.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Tiina Kuukkanen
- Riitta Räsänen
Teacher in charge
Tiina Kuukkanen
Groups
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
STT19SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SOS19S1Sosionomi
-
SKO19SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SOS19SMSosionomi
-
SOS20S1Sosionomi
-
STT19S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SFT19SMFysioterapeutti
-
SAR19S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR19SMSairaanhoitaja
-
SFT19S1Fysioterapeutti
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
03.01.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 35
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Kristiina Juntunen
- Tiina Blek
Teacher in charge
Tiina Blek
Groups
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
STT19SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SOS19S1Sosionomi
-
SKO19SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SOS19SMSosionomi
-
SOS20S1Sosionomi
-
STT19S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SFT19SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT19S1Fysioterapeutti
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
03.01.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Occupational Therapy
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Social Services
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Physiotherapy
Teachers
- Riitta Räsänen
- Tarja Tapio
Teacher in charge
Tarja Tapio
Groups
-
SFT20SMFysioterapeutti
-
STT20S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SFT20S1Fysioterapeutti
-
STT19SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SOS19S1Sosionomi
-
SKO19SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SAR20S1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SOS19SMSosionomi
-
SOS20S1Sosionomi
-
STT19S1Toimintaterapeutti
-
SAR20KMSairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20K1Sairaanhoitaja
-
SAR20SMBachelor's degree Programme in Nursing
-
SAR21SMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SOS20SMSosionomi (AMK)
-
SAR21K1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SAR21KMSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
STT20SMToimintaterapeutti
-
SKO20SMBachelor's Degree Programme in Rehabilitation Counselling
-
SAR21S1Sairaanhoitaja (AMK)
-
SFT19SMFysioterapeutti
-
SFT19S1Fysioterapeutti
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Laadullinen tutkimus:
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Määrällinen tutkimus:
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kirjallisuuskatsaus, toimintatutkimus
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Kehittämistoiminta:
Toikko, T & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta : näkökulmia kehittämisprosessiin, osallistamiseen ja tiedontuotantoon. Tampere University Press:Taju.
Kappaleet: 2, 4, 5, 6 (s. 13–23, 29–34, 56–112, 117–154)
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Tutkimusetiikka:
Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja sen loukkausepäilyjen käsitteleminen Suomessa. 2013. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje 2012. www.tenk.fi
Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettinen ennakkoarviointi Suomessa. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje. 2019. https://tenk.fi/fi/eettinen-ennakkoarviointi-ihmistieteissa.
Teaching methods
opetus toteutetaan kokonaisuudessaan verkossa
Exam dates and retake possibilities
TENTTI: 24.2. kello 14 00-1630
1. uusintatentti 7.3. 1400 - 1630
2. uusintatentti 17.3. kello 1400 - 1630
Alternative completion methods
ei vaihtoehtoisia suoritustapoja
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
03.01.2022 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
80 % Face-to-face, 20 % Online learning
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Lutakko Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
- Salla Grommi
Groups
-
SAR21KMJVSairaanhoitaja (AMK)
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Timing
01.01.2022 - 21.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
RDI portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Face-to-face, 80 % Online learning
Unit
School of Business
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Business Information Technology
Teachers
- Jarkko Immonen
- Elina Vaara
Groups
-
HTK18S1Tietojenkäsittely
-
HTK17S1Tietojenkäsittely
-
HTK19S1Tietojenkäsittely
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures or Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done individually.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis topic 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
02.08.2021 - 05.09.2021
Timing
30.08.2021 - 31.01.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Risto Pakarinen
- Ilkka Suur-Uski
- Henri Kervola
Groups
-
TLS19KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
TLS20KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
TLS21KMMLogistiikan tutkinto-ohjelma (AMK)
-
TLS18KMBachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja sen loukkausepäilyjen käsitteleminen Suomessa. 2013. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje 2012. www.tenk.fi
Ihmiseen kohdistuvan tutkimuksen eettiset periaatteet ja ihmistieteiden eettinen ennakkoarviointi Suomessa. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan ohje. 2019. https://tenk.fi/fi/eettinen-ennakkoarviointi-ihmistieteissa
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
02.08.2021 - 05.09.2021
Timing
30.08.2021 - 31.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Online learning
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 18
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Purchasing and Logistics Engineering
Teachers
- Marjo Turunen
- Anna Riikonen
Groups
-
TLE18S1Degree Programme in International Logistics
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This is a contact lesson course that includes live Zoom sessions, self-studying, group works and assignments.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
This course doesn´t have an exam.
Student workload
Contact lessons 9 h
Independent studying 40 h
Learning assignments 60
Thesis subject 26 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
01.11.2021 - 30.04.2022
Timing
30.08.2021 - 29.04.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Teachers
- Petri Vauhkonen
Teacher in charge
Petri Vauhkonen
Groups
-
TLS19S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
TLS20S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
-
TLS18S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Logistics
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons (live Zoom will be used if necessary), self-studying, assignments and group works.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
No final exam.
Alternative completion methods
The admission procedures are described in the degree rule and the study guide. The teacher of the course will give you more information on possible specific course practices.
Student workload
Contact lessons 9 h
Independent studying 40 h
Learning assignments 60
Thesis subject 26 h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
02.08.2021 - 05.09.2021
Timing
30.08.2021 - 30.04.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Technology
Campus
Main Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 40
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Construction and Civil Engineering
Teachers
- Pekka Lähdesmäki
Teacher in charge
Pekka Lähdesmäki
Groups
-
TRY18S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Construction and Civil Engineering
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Eskola, J. & Suoranta, J. 2014 tai uudempi painos. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen. Tampere: Vastapaino
Tuomi, J.& Sarajärvi, A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällön analyysi. Tammi
Vilkka, H. 2007. tai uudempi painos. Tutki ja mittaa: määrällisen tutkimuksen perusteet. Helsinki: Tammi.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE
Stolt, M. & Axelin, A. & Suhonen, R. 2015 tai uudempi painos. Kirjallisuuskatsaus hoitotieteessä. Turun yliopisto 2. korjattu painos
Toikko, T. & Rantanen, T. 2009. Tutkimuksellinen kehittämistoiminta. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy. eKirjana TamPub- julkaisuissa http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7732-4
Ojasalo, K. Moilanen, T. & Ritalahti, J. 2015. Kehittämistyön menetelmät. Uudenlaista osaamista liiketoimintaan. Helsinki: WSOYpro. (soveltuvin osin)
Hirsjärvi, S., Remes, P., Sajavaara, P. & Sinivuori, E. 2009. Tutki ja kirjoita. 15. uud. p. Helsinki: Tammi.
Kananen, J. 2010. Opinnäytetyön kirjoittamisen käytännön opas. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Kananen, J., Gates, M. & JAMK University of Applied Sciences. (2011). Rafting through the thesis process: Step by step guide to thesis research. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulu
Teaching methods
This is a contact lesson course that includes face to face lessons (live Zoom will be used if necessary), self-studying, assignments and group works.
Detailed implementation method and group division will be specified at the beginning of the course.
Moodle's e-learning environment is used in this course.
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Tällä toteutuksella ei ole tenttiä.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
lessons 9 h
Independent studying 40 h
Learning assignments 60
Thesis subject 26 h
Total 135 hours.
Content scheduling
Opintojakso koostuu 3 op yhteisestä osuudesta ja 2 op itsenäisestä osuudesta (opinnäytetyö aihe-ehdotus) ". " op itsenäinen osuus suositellaan suoritettavaksi yhteisen osuuden jälkeen.
Evaluation scale
Pass/Fail
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Enrollment
02.08.2021 - 05.09.2021
Timing
23.08.2021 - 20.05.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Mode of delivery
Face-to-face
Unit
School of Health and Social Studies
Campus
Finnish Music Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
0 - 50
Degree programmes
- Bachelor's Degree Programme in Music Pedagogue
Teachers
- Eeva Oksala
Groups
-
KPD19S1Bachelor's Degree Programme in Music
Objectives
Purpose of the course
The purpose of the course is to familiarise the student with the basics of development and research activities and support the writing of the bachelor's thesis.
Course competences:
Ethical competence
Internationalisation and communications competence
Learning and information management competence
EUR-ACE accredited degree programmes
Investigations and information retrieval
Engineering practice
Communication and team-working
Course learning outcomes
As a student, you are familiar with the different stages involved in research and development processes supporting your thesis, the required approaches to research and development and the most common options for data collection and analysis. You are able to choose a development or research approach and methods (data collection and analysis methods) that are suitable to your thesis. You are familiar with JAMK’s thesis process and are able to prepare a thesis topic proposal and plan in which you justify the methodological choices you made. You are familiar with the research ethics governing thesis preparation and act in accordance with it and the principles of good scientific practice.
Content
Research process (research setting: research problem, research question, research approach, data collection and analysis methods, reliability review, open science)
The generic structure of a thesis, evaluation criteria and exercises on evaluating completed theses
Research ethics and good scientific or artistic practice
Integrative literature review
- Problem identification, location of studies, data collection from individual studies, evaluation of the studies and data analysis
Qualitative research:
- the most common qualitative data collection methods, analysis methods, reliability review
Quantitative research:
- data collection (existing or self-collected data, questionnaire), measuring scales, sampling, data analysis methods (indicators, direct distribution, cross-tabulation, statistical tests, reliability of results)
Research-based development
- setting development problems / questions, choosing development methods, data collection and analysis, assessing the reliability of research and development activities
Preparation of a thesis topic proposal
Learning materials and recommended literature
Dodd, S-J. & Epstein, I. 2012. Practice-based research in social work: a guide for reluctant researchers. London; New York: Routledge.
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press cop.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications : design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
Ethical principles and ethical review in human sciences. 2020. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. 2012. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. www.tenk.fi/en
Teaching methods
Individual learning tasks
Group work
Lectures
Webinars
Online exam
Exam dates and retake possibilities
Online exam will be done at informed time.
An unsuccessful online exam can be done again in two sessions.
Alternative completion methods
Opintojakson voi opinnollistaa tutkintosäännön mukaisesti.
Student workload
- lectures/online lectures 24 h
- learning tasks 45 h
- studying the course material 20 h
- preparation for the exam 26 h
- thesis subject 20h
Total 135 hours.
Evaluation scale
0-5
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Adequate 1
The student is familiar with the steps involved in the development and research process. They know how to obtain research knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student knows some key research and development methods and is able to describe the differences between them. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Satisfactory 2
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They recognise possibilities for applying development and research methods. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
The student is able to independently obtain and assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. They are able to choose a development or research method suitable for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Very good 4
The student is able to independently obtain and critically assess knowledge concerning their own area of development or research. The student is able to choose a development or research approach and method suitable for their thesis and justify their choice. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
The student is able to obtain knowledge concerning their area of development or research and is capable of source criticism.
They are able to analyse the differences between different development and research methods and justify the choice of development or research methods for their thesis. The student is familiar with the ethical principles and principles of good scientific practice related to the thesis. The student acts in compliance with them.